Oxford 0 United 1 - report/ratings

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,351
Reaction score
36,016
Finally, after 4 months and 8 games, going back to the playoff final agony of last season, Sheffield United have won a game of football! The Blades finally scored a goal breaking a spell of around 6 hours without netting and kept a clean sheet at the other end, as they saw off Wilder’s former club Oxford, by a single goal. Callum O’Hare got the crucial goal, ably assisted by Chiedozie Ogbene and despite a few late scares, the Blades much improved second half performance saw them take the three points. United remain bottom of the league but at least have some life after a horrific start to this campaign and something for the new/old manager to build on.



Wilder’s words in the build up to the game has been sterner according to the man himself and he made two changes with Chong and Mee in for Matos and Godrey and it appeared it could be a change of shape? However, the Blades plans were changed even before kick off as Chong picked up an injury in the warm up and Soumare had to come in. Zatterstrom was promoted to the bench. Oxford, fresh off an impressive win at Bristol City last week to take them away from the Blades at the foot of the table, started with United’s former academy striker Will Lankshear.



The game began and it was not the 3 at the back that many had predicted as Tanganga started at a more orthodox right back position. Soumare was busy early but his touch was awry on more than one occasion. Campbell was played in but took too long and was crowded out but the home side quickly settled down to look the more cohesive unit. Peck’s errant pass saw the ball drop to Helik who had stayed up after a corner but his shot was blocked by Tanganga. The defender then lost the ball himself and the ball remained in the United third. Oxford were moving the ball about much more confidently but the Blades were so slow both with and without the ball. O’Hare nearly played in Campbell but his pass was overhit as the abysmal passing continued. Mee and Cooper were the next with cheap giveaways leading to the U’s having a further spell with the ball.



The ball came in and McGuiness had to clear before Mee repeated this as the ball was not sticking up at the top of the pitch with O’Hare, Hamer and Campell bullied out of it and slow to react to anything coming their way. Hamer released Ogbene for a rare cross to come in but it was headed out for a corner which came to nothing. Hamer then volleyed a pass wildly into the sky, and out of play drawing cheers from the home side.



Oxford played two dangerous balls into the box the was kept out and then Spencer headed wide. The neat build up saw them get down both the left- and right-hand sides, with a clever backheel setting the home side free and Burrows had to make a sliding tackle. The Blades could not get out and were getting nothing in terms of control. Soumare and Peck were tossing away possession so cheaply with bad touches and passes.



The home side had another shot blocked as Mee continued to be United’s best performer in a game which saw little positive to take of note. Despite United’s struggles, they created the best chance of the game when the ball was not cleared and Hamer threaded a lovely ball through the defenders’ legs to give Campbell a great opportunity. With the goal at his mercy, he blazed wide and the time since United’s last goal now approached an incredible 10 hours!



Oxford would have been harshly behind as they had controlled the game and ended the half as they had been, most of the game, well on top. They created their best chance as the ball bounced across the box and De Keersmaecker had his shot saved from Cooper and the ball was somehow scrambled clear. Plachetea then shot over. As the game entered the final minute of stoppage time, Branagan had a low shot that Cooper had to push away. The half ended with United at 0-0, despite them having the best chance, but had been another largely awful performance where they had been outmuscled, outfought, and out footballed by a much more cohesive side.



The second half saw United come out with a more determined approach and at least had a spell with the ball. Soumare hit a shot over the bar and then O’Hare carried the ball forward, feeding Campbell but his finish lacked conviction and bobbled across goal via a deflection off a defender. United then won three corners in succession and clearly were looking far more determined and on the front foot than they had since probably the opening day.



Burrows put a cross over and Peck headed down but straight at Cumming but at least the Blades finally fashioned something on goal. United continued to dominate, in a turnaround from the first half, and Peck was at the heart of some of the improved play. Hamer received a short corner and came inside but took too many touches and too long and failed to get a shot over.



United’s much improved effort was punctuated with a goal – Ogbene was the architect as he made the running down the right but he looked to have overrun it but somehow kept it in and sent over a cross. O’HARE took an excellent first touch to set himself up and his finish was precise, hard, and low into the far corner across Cumming. The Blades players celebrated in front of their jubilant away supporters, who had probably forgot what it was like to see a goal from their side!



United players were telling each other to calm down as Oxford made changes. Mills and Dembele, the scourge of United at this ground last year, came on – for Placeta and Prelec. Mee’s impressively calm performance was summed up by a superb slide tackle, where he won the ball and came away with it on the left-hand side. Soumare was replaced by Matos before Campell was lucky not to get a yellow card as he cynically pulled his man back. Burrows was not so fortunate, as he chopped Mills down, who went past him down the right-hand side. Cooper pushed the free kick away but then caught the cross that came back in from the other side.



There was a double change for both sides, as Vaulks and Harris replaced Krastev and Lankshear for the home side. Cannon and McCallum replaced Campbell and Burrows for the visitors. The game ticked into the final 10 minutes and United had not really been threatened since the break. Vaulks was booked for protesting following a foul on O’Hare before Hamer had to be taken off – following a bout of cramp. Seriki came on. Leigh also came on for Currie for the U’s.



McCallum headed behind the deep cross as Oxford won a corner and suddenly they almost levelled out of nowhere. The ball dropped into the box and Leigh turned and swivelled and his shot hit the foot of the post. It was a let off for United. However, soon after Branagan’s attempts to con the referee into giving a penalty kick was pathetic in contrast. Referee, Speedie, waved off the appeal and really should have booked the attacking player.



There was to be 6 minutes of stoppage time and with Vaulks long throw, the Blades were suddenly under some sustained pressure and another chance came when Mills again got away, beating McCallum this time. His cross was inviting for Long but headed a few yards wide as the Blades sat very deep. Leigh then header over from a corner. The ball kept coming back and a late free kick was won after Ogbene’s silly foul but after an Oxford player gave his best seal impersonation, heading it onto himself twice, the ball was cleared and fell to Vaulks who smashed over. That was the final act as the referee’s whistle went after Cooper played the ball back into play. It was sheer relief for the Blades player and coaching staff, that they finally were able to end a match with smiles on their faces.



United – It is a win and at this stage, it matter little how we get it. We could not afford to lose again for the confidence of the players and fans. I genuinely think it would have been hard to raise the players if we had been defeated again. I am not saying we will climb the league but you can at least see some confidence come back and we can maybe relax a bit and in turn play better. I have to say, the game today was a real game of two halves. First half we were pathetic and as bad as anything we have seen this season. The defence played ok in terms of blocks and heading/kicking it away but we were penned back for long periods. Our passing was atrocious with so many bad first touches or misplaced balls. We never kept it and never got up the field. Campbell was not moving and Hamer and O’Hare just ineffective and muscled out of it. We offered absolutely nothing until that late Campbell chance – which ironically was the best of the half. Oxford did not create tons but had a few decent chances and played all the decent football. They controlled the game and were winning first and second balls. We could not really get our foot in and were played around too easily. I felt a goal was coming but it never materialised. Mee really helped us to just defend with more composure but the midfield pair of Soumare and Peck were dreadful – just tossing the ball away time after time. It was hard to see what the plan was to get up the field and we looked really sorry side that looked no idea how they might fashion a chance, let alone score a goal.



As I say, Oxford did not create lots but Cooper made a few (expected) saves and a number of balls whizzed around our box and did not quite fall for them. They had a lot of decent passages of play and Oxford were playing forward passes and trying to force us back and succeeded. I was happy to go in level but worried how we might get even a foothold in the game – was it changes needed in formation or personnel but the alternatives in reserve did not fill me with much hope. I was surprised we seemed to play a flat back four essentially with Tanganga at right back. I thought it would be 5 with the selection. With Chong getting injured – who is even more attacking than Soumare really – it would be an even better chance to look at that formation but maybe they could not change it if they had planned the 4 in the week? I just thought it saw the same issues as before with full backs exposed and the midfield not given enough bodies and lots of lightweight players at the top of the field.



To be fair to United, the second half was far better and we came out with a more determined approach. We forced them back, had some efforts (Soumare/Peck) albeit tame and we started to control the possession. Peck improved hugely and we saw at least Burrows and Ogbene get into some advanced positions. We won three corners and started to at least look threatening. They offered nothing at all but it helped our whole team played higher up the field and were able to by us keeping the ball better and dropping on loose balls/50-50’s. We improved hugely but it was not hard from the first half or what we had seen most of the season. I am not sure we saw much of so called key men Hamer and Campbell but the side as a whole were just on the front foot and able to look the aggressor.



The goal was well made and finished and to be fair had been coming. After this the game became a bit stop start and several subs for both sides. We sort of made it scrappy and whilst we did not find the same fluency and maybe stopped attacking. I kind of get it, as we had not got a point and wanted to ensure we were not cavalier and is not natural that we may drop back and defend deeper. We did not really look like conceding and the subs slowed things down and there was no real sustained pressure from them at all. I was surprised when I looked at the clock and it said 85 minutes. It was not until they hit the post – that they even had an effort. This was a bit of a let off and the one time we let the ball drop and did not attack it. After this they had a few more chances – headers wide and had the ridiculous penalty appeal but despite them chucking men up and long throws/balls into the box- we were able to see it out.
 

Ratings:



Cooper 6/10 – Did not have that much to do. One poor clearance earlier on but then a few routine push aways and punched a cross/took a cross late on. The chance he might have got to the ball, if it had been a few inches closer to the goal being fair but I would need to look again. A clean sheet finally..



Tanganga 5.5/10 – Played right back which I think he has before but not sure that is his best position? He was ok for spells but he was guilty of some sloppy moments too in the first half. He made a few blocks and tackles and they did not threaten down this side second half.



Burrows 6/10 – First half he was kind of penned back and not able to get forward. Made one big block but then slipped and they nearly got in. Second half he put in a few dangerous crosses and much more advanced and looked more threatening. Did get booked after he was beaten way too easily down the left. Continues to be one of our better attacking threats (if you can call it that) as he at least crosses the ball/plays it forward but still nowhere near his form of last season.



McGuiness 6.5/10 – Thought he was steady today. He headed it away and did what he had to and cannot recall too many errors or moments he lost his man. Helped with an experienced steady defender alongside him.



Mee 7.5/10 –Excellent. He was our man of the match by the virtue of him seemingly being magnetised to the ball. Reads the game very well and showed his experience. Won a lot of headers and also some key blocks/tackles but just looked calm and helped the defence look less frenetic. Made a big difference.



Soumare 4/10 – Thought he was really poor. He did not hide and got around the pitch but his touch was terrible and seemed to never be in control of it. He gave it away a lot and then when running back seemed to lack fitness and looked like he was struggling to keep running at times. He had the one shot over and maybe improved a bit 2nd half but saw nothing to suggest he might be the answer. I was surprised how bad he was technically.



Peck 5/10 – First half he was as bad – if not worse than Soumare and if he had carried on may have been a 3/10! Second half much improved and symbolised United’s performance. He got around the pitch, won tackles but used it so much better and helped us have some control. As the game went on, he played some intelligent passes and allowed us to move up the field and not invite pressure. At half time I thought both him and Soumare could have been hooked if we had better options. Hopefully the improved 2nd half will get him going now.



Ogbene 5/10 – I have to say, up to the goal he was really poor and not sure we saw anything positive. He kept running into trouble or overplayed and worryingly looked like he did not have the pace to go past people. I thought that was his big asset. However, he started to get on the ball more after the break and helped us have a spell of pressure. He then had the big moment on the goal when he beat his man and sent over an excellent cross. After this he faded again and gave a daft foul away late on. At least had a big contribution though.



Hamer 5/10 – Thought he was well off it again and looked slow/immobile and way off the pace. He ran into trouble a few times and that weird smashed cross-field ball out of play summed him up. He did make the lovely ball through to Campbell which should have been a goal. After the break, we improved hugely and he had a few pieces of link play but he took too long a few times (the one where he received the short corner for instance). He then went off with cramp which seems to be an issue almost every other game.



O’Hare 6.5/10 – I am not sure he had a great game by any means and first half was lightweight, off the pace and lost it when he had it. He did not get much of the ball but when he did little with it. Just looked lost. After the break, he started to get involved and won a few free kicks and had a few moments of decent play. He then had the big finish which was taken very well. Last year until the playoffs, thought he never looked composed in front of goal and snatched at things but the way he took that was superb and crucial of course. After this his confidence went up and he got on the ball more. Of course he gets extra mark/s for the winning goal!



Campbell 3/10 – Our worst player for me sadly. Again. Looked completely immobile and again nowhere near the player of last season. He did not move into space and when he was given a few decent balls, he made a mess of things taking too long or on the big chance, smashing wide. He had another chance 2nd half but again made a mess of this. At least he got into some better areas but his overall play and effort was not good enough. I thought for long part of the match we had nothing up front. Nothing to hit, it never stuck and he never moved off for the pass/ball through. He looks to be carrying too much weight and does not have the explosiveness and quick burst of pace we saw last season. The lack of options behind him see him remain in the side. Surely when Ings is fit he will start. The concern is when Campbell goes off, Cannon is even worse. We look hopeless and toothless in this area.



Subs –



Matos 5.5/10 –He came on and won a few loose balls/played a few short passes but did not notice him too much. Got a nice hand from the Oxford fans so must have been well liked there from last season. Not a good sign that Wilder dropped him after one game. Him and Soumare seem very limited technically sadly. If/when Davies is fit (a big when) he starts alongside Peck until Arblaster is back.



Cannon – Won a free kick early on when he came on – which was more than Campbell had done but then he tried to do that every time and pitifully just kept falling to the ground. So weak physically and slow to react to balls forward. As soon as he came on, it was a sign we had no intention of trying to score and were just hanging on. I would have preferred One. He at least has a bit of pace/physicality.



McCallum – After Burrows was beat by Mills and booked – he was brought on to shore up this side. He got beat exactly the same by Mills and they nearly scored. He is energetic but that’s about it.



Seriki –Only played final few minutes. Involved in the late challenge but he did well and was never a penalty.





Manager: Wilder 6/10 – At half time I think even he will have been wondering whether it was a mistake to come back perhaps? We looked wretched and were being outplayed by a side I think may go down. Rowett had his number last time and seemed to be doing the same this season. However, as with Selles, not even sure Wilder can compensate for players not controlling the ball or making simple passes. We looked a mess and the teams had gaps all over again. The two midfielders were appalling and we had nothing up front. The defence were at least making blocks and holding them from creatin too much despite the control. I was surprised he did not try and change the shape as we again did not look like even creating a single chance. Second half, I am assuming he ripped into them as we finally saw us competing and getting amongst them and having more of the ball and making forward passes and getting the team up the field. We won some corners and had a few half chances and then scored. After this we were ok until the last few minutes and it became nervy. It was not a great performance but will point to the improvements second half and the fact we went from another desperate showing to begin the game to at least finally controlling our opponent and forcing them back. We finally built up some pressure and then actually scored a decent goal. We now must follow it up. The home fans deserve to see a big performance from the off and the team need to be at it from the start of the game on Tuesday and get the crowd going. He looked more relieved than delighted at full time as another defeat would have not only been disastrous for us but he may have felt the pressure already (not in terms of losing his job) but those critiquing his return would have had even more ammunition.





Oxford – First half played well and much better side. They moved it around crisply, forced us into mistakes and pushed us back. They had most of the game but did not create tons. The final cross/pass was not quite right and as a result failed to have any massive chances. They had a few balls pinballing around and did get behind us but not sure Cooper made many saves? We did make some good blocks. That was the only real issue as in every other aspect they were very good and looked a more together side, as the commentator said. For all that though, Campbell had the best chance. They had the better players individually and players willing to run at us and try and find forward runs/passes. They maybe would have regretted the lack of cutting edge and after the break, the Blades improved and they never got going. The goal had been coming really as they could not get out. They made chances but I cannot recall much o note at all to test us until the one that hit the post and a few headers. Overall, they may have felt they should have had a point over the course of the game and if that late chance went in, perhaps a draw was about right even if it would have been a kick in the teeth for us. They will be disappointed how they faded badly after the interval.



I expect them to be around the bottom area of the league. They have signed a few promising players from the continent added to some players who did well last time out at this level to help keep them up – the likes of Cumming, Helik, Branagan, Dembele and Harris. However, they lack the squad depth and experience and with the sides coming up being stronger, I think they will do well to survive despite Rowett’s nous in the Championship.



Opponent Man of the Match – I thought Spencer, who used to be at Huddersfield, was the main threat first half and seemed to popping up everywhere. Keersmaecker had a few promising moments too. I like Helik the centre half and he completely bullied Campbell. I thought he may have been a better signing than McGuinness personally. Mills, the son of Danny, had two good runs late and beat both our left full backs all end up.



Opponent Weak link – Brannagan was disappointing in midfield and he was as careless on the ball as Peck and Soumare but Lankshear, the former Blade was largely anonymous (nice though to see him exchange a laugh after he fell down with Peck – both grew up together and were with United in the u18’s of course and came to us from Arsenal at the same time). I was more concerned when Harris came on as he gave them some physicality.



Referee / Officials – Ben Speedie. Not a referee I have heard of before? I saw some criticising him during the game but thought he was ok. He let things flow and kept his book in his pocket till the end. Not sure I can recall too many poor decisions for either side. Just reffed it with minimum fuss. Should have booked Branagan for that ridiculous dive at the end but suppose least he did not give the penalty!
 
Heard some say they thought it was a 5 but I didn't see that? Seemed a flat four with Tanganga an orthodox right back. Maybe when we had it, we went to a 3 and perhaps second half Tanganga was more inside.
 
Cheers Deadbat

Funny how different eyes see different things, thought Soumaré was decent technically but clearly lacking match sharpness. He got us up the pitch in the second half from a more central position.
I thought every ball bounced off him and his passing was wretched. He ran around and seemed enthusiastic but woeful technically. He was better 2nd half I agree but looks well off the pace.
 
Great report Deadbat. I don't know how you managed to post this so soon after the end of the match.
 
Too kind on Campbell for me.

Atrocious performance and looks completely out of shape. Unless fat and round is a shape.

How he's been allowed to get in that kind of shape is indicative of our current plight.

If our only option to the Pillsbury Dough Boy is Cannon, then I fear we really are going to struggle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10p
Heard some say they thought it was a 5 but I didn't see that? Seemed a flat four with Tanganga an orthodox right back. Maybe when we had it, we went to a 3 and perhaps second half Tanganga was more inside.
Look like they changed formation after about 20 minutes. Tanganga is wasted at RB. Ogbene dropped deeper maybe as a consequence of our abysmal early showing Out of possession we had a 3 at the back and looked much better for it as Mee organised enabling McGuiness to dominate the air. It was a complete reversal from the last time we played Oxford. We looked comfortable dealing with the hoofwaffen. We need to go with the 3 from now on. Tanganga at Wall liked to bomb forward down the right ala Basham style. CW post match did say the players had coped with a formation change so I'm assuming the intention was to go with a 3.

It was a mixed bag performance with the second half showing a significant improvement on the first. I'll give Soumare some slack because he had to come in at such a late stage. Clearly both he and Peck received bollockings at half time. Peck once again had lost the ball on the edge of the area and they nearly scored from it. Thought Soumare improved after half time and was probably playing his best football when he was hooked. As for Hamer I agree a huge disappointment again. Both he and Campbell need a conditioning course over the next few weeks.

We scored a goal we haven't seen for weeks. A winger getting to the bye line and crossing first time with his dominant foot. Good finish from O'hare.

It was scruffy. It was a win. It was 3 points. We needed that. The concern now is the management of the players who are not fully match fit. We need Mee against Southampton but can he manage 2 games in 3 days? Getting everyone up to speed over the next few weeks is a priority.
 
Heard some say they thought it was a 5 but I didn't see that? Seemed a flat four with Tanganga an orthodox right back. Maybe when we had it, we went to a 3 and perhaps second half Tanganga was more inside.
It's was definitely a 5.

Posted on another thread - it perhaps looked confusing as Tanganga drifted wider when Ogbene was forward. Fair to say it was quite fluid in/out of possession. But generally speaking it was more akin to a 5-3-1-1
 
Cheers Deadbat

Funny how different eyes see different things, thought Soumaré was decent technically but clearly lacking match sharpness. He got us up the pitch in the second half from a more central position.
He started well, then looked poor for the rest of the first half, struggling to settle down and find his position on and off the ball.

Second half he played well.

I think he looks very interesting, looks to have a high potential, but is raw and may need more time to adapt than I thought. To his defence he probably hasn't played a lot as an 8 and he was an emergency selection, probably not quite as prepared as he could have been. Souza also looked all over the place having been played out of position (role) in his first season.
 
I'd have to agree Campbell looks to have put on half a stone over the summer, looking disinterested, he also seems to have lost that hunger for goals. I think Asaba made a good point if we play balls up to his head he is always going to struggle against a big CB, to get the best from him the balls needs to go behond him for him to run onto and also to get defenders turned towards their own goal. It also helps if our midfield get a few yards further up the pitch so he isn't so isolated.
 
It was a mixed bag performance with the second half showing a significant improvement on the first. I'll give Soumare some slack because he had to come in at such a late stage. Clearly both he and Peck received bollockings at half time. Peck once again had lost the ball on the edge of the area and they nearly scored from it. Thought Soumare improved after half time and was probably playing his best football when he was hooked. As for Hamer I agree a huge disappointment again. Both he and Campbell need a conditioning course over the next few weeks.

We scored a goal we haven't seen for weeks. A winger getting to the bye line and crossing first time with his dominant foot. Good finish from O'hare.

It was scruffy. It was a win. It was 3 points. We needed that. The concern now is the management of the players who are not fully match fit. We need Mee against Southampton but can he manage 2 games in 3 days? Getting everyone up to speed over the next few weeks is a priority.

Always slightly annoys me how whenever we win…so many Blades will say we played well and after a defeat…many will be adamant we were crap.
In reality in many games as you say it’s often a mixed bag, with positives and negatives.

1st half thought we were quite poor and kind of lethargic as though we were conserving energy however fortunately Oxford looked poor too.
To be fair to both teams it seemed as though both teams were nervous and they were more concerned about not conceding rather than scoring a goal.
Oxford had more of the play but we had easily the best chance of the match when Campbell should have scored.

2nd half we gradually got our game together and for about 10 to 15 minutes we played similar to how we played last season.
Forcing Oxford back to defend in numbers as we forced plenty of corners. We did a lot of crisp fast passing but tended to over pass or try tricks.
Hamer was on the edge of the box, was he going to curl it into the top corner? No, he dummied it and brilliantly went past their defender, he had another chance to shoot but no, he tried to dummy it again past another defender, but this time their defender got a touch on it and the chance disintegrated.
When we did score it was no surprise, we had been dominating and deserved the lead. Oxford looked a really poor outfit.

I thought if we continue being positive, a 2 or 3-0 was possible but we seemed to settle trying to slow down/ control/ contain Oxford
Which we did for much of that 2nd half however in the final 10 minutes Oxford threw the kitchen sink at us.
The only way they were ever going to score was with a goalmouth scramble or a deflection, so they simply pumped it into our box. Was concerned about our lack of composure as (like last season) we kind of parked the bus and booted it clear, but (like last season) it worked. Also agree some of the individual performances were mixed….good example regards Peck and Soumari….at times both were really good but they also had spells of being worryingly poor.

This match was so important that the performance is irrelevant really. Also it’s difficult to perform when confidence is low.
We won and overall…..think we just about deserved the 3 points. Also for context, think Oxford will be relegated with Wednesday.
 
Last edited:

Always slightly annoys me how whenever we win…so many Blades will say we played well and after a defeat…many will be adamant we were crap.
In reality in many games as you say it’s often a mixed bag, with positives and negatives.

1st half thought we were quite poor and kind of lethargic as though we were conserving energy however fortunately Oxford looked poor too.
To be fair to both teams it seemed as though both teams were nervous and they were more concerned about not conceding rather than scoring a goal.
Oxford had more of the play but we had easily the best chance of the match when Campbell should have scored.

2nd half we gradually got our game together and for about 10 to 15 minutes we played similar to how we played last season.
Forcing Oxford back to defend in numbers as we forced plenty of corners. We did a lot of crisp fast passing but tended to over pass or try tricks.
Hamer was on the edge of the box, was he going to curl it into the top corner? No, he dummied it and brilliantly went past their defender, he had another chance to shoot but no, he tried to dummy it again past another defender, but this time their defender got a touch on it and the chance disintegrated.
When we did score it was no surprise, we had been dominating and deserved the lead. Oxford looked a really poor outfit.

I thought if we continue being positive, a 2 or 3-0 was possible but we seemed to settle trying to slow down/ control/ contain Oxford
Which we did for much of that 2nd half however in the final 10 minutes Oxford threw the kitchen sink at us.
The only way they were ever going to score was with a goalmouth scramble or a deflection, so they simply pumped it into our box. Was concerned about our lack of composure as (like last season) we kind of parked the bus and booted it clear, but (like last season) it worked. Also agree some of the individual performances were mixed….good example regards Peck and Soumari….at times both were really good but they also had spells of being worryingly poor.

This match was so important that the performance is irrelevant really. Also it’s difficult to perform when confidence is low.
We won and overall…..think we just about deserved the 3 points. Also for context, think Oxford will be relegated with Wednesday.
Spot on summary as I saw it too 👍
 
He didnt play right back

View attachment 222763

That picture was not how the game started. I could probably find countless freeze frames where Tanganga was right on the touchline almost and his position was definitely like a right back to begin. I said it's a 5 but my son kept pointing to where JT was sk I changed my mind. It might have changed as the game went on as someone said above but Tanganga was far wider than Mee and McGuiness much of the game from how I saw it? Maybe it was slightly different when we had the ball and 2nd half we were more of a 5...or a 3?
 
That picture was not how the game started. I could probably find countless freeze frames where Tanganga was right on the touchline almost and his position was definitely like a right back to begin. I said it's a 5 but my son kept pointing to where JT was sk I changed my mind. It might have changed as the game went on as someone said above but Tanganga was far wider than Mee and McGuiness much of the game from how I saw it? Maybe it was slightly different when we had the ball and 2nd half we were more of a 5...or a 3?
When we had the ball JT played wider, when they had the ball JT went inside and Ogbene tracked back. Having a back three allowed Burrows higher up the pitch when we had the ball.
 
That picture was not how the game started. I could probably find countless freeze frames where Tanganga was right on the touchline almost and his position was definitely like a right back to begin. I said it's a 5 but my son kept pointing to where JT was sk I changed my mind. It might have changed as the game went on as someone said above but Tanganga was far wider than Mee and McGuiness much of the game from how I saw it? Maybe it was slightly different when we had the ball and 2nd half we were more of a 5...or a 3?
I could do the same with Mee on the left, but we played 3 CBs. It made McGuiness look much better, unfortunately it made Tanganga look much worse.
Mee brought much needed leadership, but boy oh boy, his distribution is woeful.
 
Mee brought much needed leadership, but boy oh boy, his distribution is woeful.
Let's put it down to rustiness.

McGuinness' best game by far, looked pretty unflustered throughout. They should relish playing in a three really, and I fancy us to improve going the other way as a result - we just need to get the balance right to ensure Burrows/Ogbene don't get pinned back too often.
 
Good report Deadbat. Not a great performance but not much different to quite a few games last season that we won by the odd goal. We need a few more wins like this and to strengthen in the JTW. Moore would have been a decent option to have and we are definitely missing Vinnie, Anel and dare I say it JLT. Campbell and Cannon have been poor unfortunately but we must remember that they are both strikers who have had periods of good form in the past, and may come good again. Cannon might need a new club to regain his form, and we'll surely be looking to offload others in January.
 
It was a 5-1-2-1-1 out of possession (diamond) and a 4-1-2-3 diamond with 1 asymmetrical winger in possession, it was a good choice once we are confident and playing again I think a 4-1-2-2-1 (2 no 10.5s that can drift outside to cross or ahead of striker on the fly or act as pivots for the rcm, lcm, rb, lb to overlap individually to maintain shape for defense) ohare, chong, hamer, ogbene, Barry, Brooks or even a striker could all offer different styles of play from these two positions think it would improve our attack making it more unpredictable and give our strikers a triangle to play in
 
Last edited:

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom