I've skimmed through this thread again and all I've seen is some valid questioning of the contribution being made by players who have been brought in and made first team regulars. There is no question that Berge has spent considerable time on the pitch being ineffective, McB has not hit the back of the net as much as we'd hoped (pre-requisite for a striker in most people's eyes) and Mousset has raised concerns with his fitness levels.
Yet anyone raising this is suddenly a "moron" and "worse than pigs". Granted, these OTT insults were delivered by just one poster who seems incapable of civilised discourse, but it now seems to be that many people won't countenance criticism of the players or Wilder's team decisions - not an attitude that was present under any of our previous managers. It looks like a cult status is developing around Wilder and the fan base is splitting between followers and heretics.
There's nothing wrong with questioning a player's performance on a football forum, or his selection. You can disagree with the opinion, but demanding that it can't be questioned is missing the point of a discussion forum. Apart from one post (McShitty) I haven't seen anything unreasonable, yet you would have thought people had booked their place in hell for eternity.
Players take a huge wage, bonuses, transfer pay-outs and when they play well they receive the accolades and even adoration of the fans. When they don't, they get criticism. They know that, if they can't deal with it they should choose a different profession. When they hear that fans are unhappy with their performance, they should take it as a kick up the arse and get on with it.
These players and the whole team upped their game last match and hopefully that will continue, but if any player under-performs in the future I would expect comments about it on here and that would be completely normal.