The underlying thread seems to be that even though you've committed a dreadful crime, served your sentence, and realised that you acted in such a revolting manner, that your punishment should extend way beyond what the legal system deems appropriate. Of course, the argument that comes back is that the victim can never walk away from the act that was perpetrated upon her, so presumably that's why tariff's exist, and even then they can be inappropriate, so what's left is an unsatisfactory situation that leaves deep frustration.....there really is no satisfactory solution other than for the culprit to be caught, sentenced, and serve his time, and, hopefully to realise that what they did was wrong. As for the ongoing punishment argument, it has the mentality of the lynchmob and the pulpit rolled into one.
I'm not familiar with Ms Bindel, but I've read enough feminist rhetoric to know that there's a strain of thought that ultimately seeks female separatism, suggesting that the further they can put space between women and men the better. Yes, it is a crazed argument, it's redundant for a number of reasons, most noticeably that people, male, female, black, white, gay, heterosexual, need to find ways to communicate and live together, otherwise what you're left with is something akin to a world view that is parlous in it's outlook.