UnitedBlade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 3,807
- Reaction score
- 3,972
He was there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
He was there.
Woolford is there too
Offering nowt as fukin per
That's a bad bruise Brayford got on his leg ,my nan had one like that after walking into the settee.
That's a bad bruise Brayford got on his leg ,my nan had one like that after walking into the settee.
What is even more noticeable is how much Brayford is receding......
duffy most likely number 9 seems to be a striker/winger numberBrayford is wearing No 2. Assuming this is confirmed when the actual squad numbers are announced, it will make me and I know some others on this forum very happy, and be the ultimate affirmation that CW understands the fans and knows that, sometimes, it's the little things that keep us happy. The big question remains: who will get No 9?
Brayford is wearing No 2. Assuming this is confirmed when the actual squad numbers are announced, it will make me and I know some others on this forum very happy, and be the ultimate affirmation that CW understands the fans and knows that, sometimes, it's the little things that keep us happy. The big question remains: who will get No 9?
duffy most likely number 9 seems to be a striker/winger number
could be mate if true then duffy might end up as number 7 thats also usually used for wingersLooks to me like Che Adams has it - going off those images
could be mate if true then duffy might end up as number 7 thats also usually used for wingers
With 4 and 5 for the two first-choice centre-backs, and Duffy at No 7 rather than McNuts, that looks pretty good to me, a big improvement on last season (and I'm not just talking about the numbers).Again going off the pictures from Boxing & Preseason, i would guess at the following:
1 Long
2 Brayford
3 Hussey
6 Basham
7 McNulty
8 Scougall
9 Adams
10 Sharp
11 Done
14 Calvert-Lewin
15 Coutts
16 J Wallace
17 K Wallace
19 Woolford
21 Duffy
22 Reed
23 Whiteman
Quite a few i don't recognise
Gladiator training this is not.
This is not going to instil fear into anyone. Can you imagine Morgs, Billy Whitehurst, Curtis and the class of 71 entertaining this? I'm also sure that punchbag is a bit lower than normal to account for our lads. I hope they had fun but I'm not sure an hours boxing class will add much to their repertoire..
Mind you it could pre Spanish holiday, sorry training camp preparation, just in case McNulty decides to get on it down the local ouzo and bozo canteen...
UTB
Mate of mine had a similar set up. Hanging bag and one of those that you fix with elastic top and bottom. The hanging bag was knackering, like you say, after about two minutes. Hitting the other one more than three times in a row was really difficult. All about timing, as you know.If they were just messing about then it won't have done them any good, if they were put through a proper boxing drill then maybe it is part of Wilders plan to get them really fit. Boxing training is very hard. I still have a big punch bag in the garage, when people see it they often laugh and ask to have a go, two minutes later they creased up, struggling to breathe. If you add in the knees and kicks, Thai or kick boxing style, you are really knackered after. As part of a training plan, it is probably the fastest way to get fit.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?