Matthew Kilgallon OS

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

mattbianco1

Forum Royalty
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
31,740
Reaction score
62,265
Location
Frecheville
I can't copy and paste the write up but... http://www.sufc.co.uk/page/MediaTalk/0,,10418~1885749,00.html

Basically it says that Kilgallon is leaving in January "But only if the price is right!"

Best get Bruce Forsyth in then as McCabe clearly doesn't know what price is right i.e. James Beattie to Stoke for less than we paid for him after he scores like 1 in 2 for 18months. Well done Kev. £500k it is then
 

£600k is the reported figure - or free in the Summer
 
I'd prefer free in the summer.

A. Because that way he may stay if we get promoted and
B. Because no doubt the money wont be injected back into the team anyway.
 
C&Ped

Uncertainty over Matthew Kilgallon's future won't be allowed to dictate Sheffield United's manoeuvres during the transfer window, chairman Kevin McCabe has warned.

Bramall Lane's chairman and major shareholder made the pledge after coaching staff confirmed they are resigned to losing the centre-half when the Football League re-opens for business next month.

Speaking before Saturday's draw at Queens Park Rangers, manager Kevin Blackwell described the situation as a "fait accompli" as interest in Kilgallon continues to grow.

The 25-year-old's contract is set to expire at the end of the season, and United could recoup only a fraction of the £1.75 million they paid to sign him from Yorkshire rivals Leeds if the player and his representatives continue to play hardball.

Newcastle, Hull City, Burnley, Bolton Wanderers and Wigan Athletic are all known to be monitoring the situation closely, but McCabe told The Star: "The only way Matthew will be going anywhere is if we receive an offer that's acceptable to this club.

Monday's media talk
Posted on: Mon 21 Dec 2009
Uncertainty over Matthew Kilgallon's future won't be allowed to dictate Sheffield United's manoeuvres during the transfer window, chairman Kevin McCabe has warned.

Bramall Lane's chairman and major shareholder made the pledge after coaching staff confirmed they are resigned to losing the centre-half when the Football League re-opens for business next month.

Speaking before Saturday's draw at Queens Park Rangers, manager Kevin Blackwell described the situation as a "fait accompli" as interest in Kilgallon continues to grow.

The 25-year-old's contract is set to expire at the end of the season, and United could recoup only a fraction of the £1.75 million they paid to sign him from Yorkshire rivals Leeds if the player and his representatives continue to play hardball.

Newcastle, Hull City, Burnley, Bolton Wanderers and Wigan Athletic are all known to be monitoring the situation closely, but McCabe told The Star: "The only way Matthew will be going anywhere is if we receive an offer that's acceptable to this club.

Article continues
Advertisement
"If we don't then he will be staying for the remainder of his deal. It's as simple as that.If it's not right for us then nothing will be happening."

Should the board of directors refuse to do business, risking the possibility that Kilgallon could depart for nothing in the summer, then it places further pressure on them to generate funding.

Blackwell has made no attempt to disguise his concerns about the first-team squad's dependence upon loans and is in the process of identifying a list of potential new signings.

Newcastle is understood to be Kilgallon's preferred destination but Hull could attempt to leapfrog them at the front of the queue by offering players in exchange.

Blackwell has confirmed he wants to extend Toni Kallio's loan from Fulham
:)
 
Kallio was excellent at QPR. He looks worth signing permanently if Fulham want shot (as I believe they do). Very cool on the ball, a proper footballer who would be an asset to the team, although Killa will be hard to replace.
 
This is purely a publicity stunt to try and get more money. Can't blame McCabe for doing it.

I wish it were true. I wouldn't let Killa go for less than a million. We stand a much better chance of getting in the play offs with him in the team.
 
Kallio was excellent at QPR. He looks worth signing permanently if Fulham want shot (as I believe they do). Very cool on the ball, a proper footballer who would be an asset to the team, although Killa will be hard to replace.

Where did he play? CB or LB?

If he can play CB then maybe we'll be ok. I'd personaly play Stewart over Taylor at LB & Naysmith over both.
 
He's a centre-back who was played out of position at left-back, with Stewart in front of him - but despite these twin handicaps, he still looked classy.
 
Walker Morgan Kallio Naysmith

Our best back 4 I think with out Killa

Still would like us to bring another CB in aswell as extend the loan of Kallio.
 
Killa is going. Blades always cash in on their assets. It's a pure, short-term business decision. Highest bid will be accepted. Probably a million or so from one of the lower premier sides.
 
Less than £1M but with player(s) coming the other way would be my bet. Agree though that if his head's right I would prefer to keep him.
 
He's a centre-back who was played out of position at left-back, with Stewart in front of him - but despite these twin handicaps, he still looked classy.

I think he is actually a left back by trade, but can play centre back. He played most of his games for Finland at left back.

Agree that he looks class though. He is positionally sound and solid at the back. Not only that but he tries to keep the ball on the deck. He is also composed. If Killa is off, which I suspect he is, then he'd be worth a put at CB with Naysmith playing LB.
 

Why do you think we signed 'Kallio'? They were hoping that 'Killa' could leave and no-one would notice....

Also, i dont see why advertising him will make clubs pay more. They're more likely to up the price if they think we don't want rid. No doubt they're trying to start a bidding war, but i still don't think it helps our case.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom