Millhousesblade1889
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
- Messages
- 4,173
- Reaction score
- 7,741
I’m not arguing about a hypothetical situation. You asked if he should be paid the same as the lowest premiership managers/ 2/3rd top championship, I said no he should be paid higher which Steve Bettis lead us to believe he is, I don’t get your problem. I’m literally saying the contract he’s on he deserves.Ha. You say no definitely not, and then say he should be paid on parity with the highest in the Championship and mid Premier League, which is isn’t.
If he deserves parity and isn’t at that level then he should be, so deserves a new deal which is what I was suggesting 3-4 posts ago.
Your original statement was he deserves a new deal to unite the club, I don’t think he does. I think he deserves the deal he’s on. Neither will know this answer without seeing everyone’s wages slips, you’re just presuming he’s badly paid because we have a wage structure in place.
Sander Berge, Brewster, Egan, Fleck will all be paid very handsomely as if Wilder signed a new deal for 4 years option of a 5th to be the worst paid in the league.
It literally leaves him with no negotiation options signing for that long, he signed a long term deal because he was very happy with the terms. Why does he need a new contract which was your original statement?