Loans for next season

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

E

Eric_Brooks

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Messages
694
Reaction score
969
Might as well put a list of loan players that we should be interested in for next season. Loans usually work out for us when they have been loaned out before. Doyle, Henderson etc; McAtee hadn't been loaned out before so took a bit of time to get used to playing above U21 level. So we should be looking at players like Phillips (spurs) as per the other thread, but here are some players doing well in the championship that we should be looking at.

You can have 6, only 5 being able to be in any match day squad. my preferred 5 highlighted. Hoever is a must not miss if sticking with a 3-5-2

Morton deep lying MC Liverpool on loan at Hull
Hoever (RCB) Wolves on loan at Stoke
Parrott (SC) Spurs on loan in Holland
Tanganga (DRC) spurs on loan at Millwall
Patino (MC) lefty Arsenal on loan at Swansea
Rushworth (GK) (Brighton) on loan at Swansea
Phillips (DC) & Devince (MC) (Spurs) on loan at Plymouth
Stansfield (Sriker Fulham) on loan at Birmingham

Outside of that a wild card who hasn't been on loan yet is Jamie Donley AMC lefty very much in the mould of McAtee.

I appreciate some people don't like loans like this, but we need to make our academy work better and send out more of our youngsters such as Easton, Peck, Marsh, Hampson, Disdale, Sasnaukas shoukd be playing lower down EFL or high end non league.
 

Hoever is the obvious target if we lose both RWBs

Will Man U loan Diallo out again?

I'd be asking Villa what they want to do with Archer and Duran

Tanganga would be a great fit for RCB but I'd prefer him permanently, and that might be possible

Carvalho from Liverpool would be great but they'll probably want to sell
 
Pretty much only loans we should be looking at are any that give a clear and marked improvement in our creative and finishing options, as these are the positions that cost a boatload of cash. Maybe a keeper if we don't opt for Johanssen or whoever else. Get a couple of attacking midfielders so that you can have a lot of rotation between Hamer, Arblaster etc and keep everyone fresh, if you can somehow get a cheat code level of striker to ease pressure on Osula and/or whoever we keep around, then great. None of the players the OP listed excite me that much at all
 
Eric_Brooks said:
I appreciate some people don't like loans like this, but we need to make our academy work better and send out more of our youngsters such as Easton, Peck, Marsh, Hampson, Disdale, Sasnaukas shoukd be playing lower down EFL or high end non league.
Click to expand...
Tinsdale?
 
There should be no loans without a buy option for me. Fee already agreed and set at the start of the loan.
If not then move on.

We cannot keep going by borrowing other teams players, we have to spend some of our funding on future assets.
 
Grizzly blade said:
There should be no loans without a buy option for me. Fee already agreed and set at the start of the loan.
If not then move on.

We cannot keep going by borrowing other teams players, we have to spend some of our funding on future assets.
Click to expand...

While I get what you are saying, this seems like an overly negative approach against the loan system, what it can do for you is gain access to players you would never be able to get on a permanent deal, often at very good value for money as to what you are laying out. Obviously you'd ideally want to be able to sort out your squad in such a longer term way as you are suggesting, but to close the door completely is crazy. If someone offered us a Mitrovic-level striker for next season that we could never sign permanently but the combination of loan fees and wages amounts to, say, £2m, are you really going to say no to that?
 
Grizzly blade said:
There should be no loans without a buy option for me. Fee already agreed and set at the start of the loan.
If not then move on.

We cannot keep going by borrowing other teams players, we have to spend some of our funding on future assets.
Click to expand...
True, but look at the quality loans we've had in the past that we couldn't afford. Are we getting promoted without Henderson in 18/19 or McAtee in 22/23? Doubt it.
 
How many players can we have on loan including foreign ones if that still adds more?
 
Rushworth
A good centre half
Morton
Stansfield
Delap

They would be some excellent loans.

Add players like Worrall and a good LWB a few squad fillers would put us right up there.

Think the good thing is that’s my list, but you could make 3 or 4 of these lists all with good players who would improve us compared to this seasons horror show.
 
jt64 said:
Pretty much only loans we should be looking at are any that give a clear and marked improvement in our creative and finishing options, as these are the positions that cost a boatload of cash. Maybe a keeper if we don't opt for Johanssen or whoever else. Get a couple of attacking midfielders so that you can have a lot of rotation between Hamer, Arblaster etc and keep everyone fresh, if you can somehow get a cheat code level of striker to ease pressure on Osula and/or whoever we keep around, then great. None of the players the OP listed excite me that much at all
Click to expand...
Some good points there.

Offensive players are usually at a premium so maybe better spending the money in those areas like you say.

I do like Stansfield / Delap think they would be very good for us. Then like you say a GK would be the main targets for loans.
 
Grizzly blade said:
There should be no loans without a buy option for me. Fee already agreed and set at the start of the loan.
If not then move on.

We cannot keep going by borrowing other teams players, we have to spend some of our funding on future assets.
Click to expand...
Funding future assets ? Tell me which of the following are now worth more than we paid
Gbric
Slimane
Trusty
Souza
Traore
Hamer
Tom Davies (and he was free)
We can't invest for toffee.
If we are going to pay fees , we need to try scouting players before buying.
 

Keen Blade said:
Funding future assets ? Tell me which of the following are now worth more than we paid
Gbric
Slimane
Trusty
Souza
Traore
Hamer
Tom Davies (and he was free)
We can't invest for toffee.
If we are going to pay fees , we need to try scouting players before buying.
Click to expand...
I would expect us to sell Anel / Souza and Archer goes back. That could bring in £40m+

Accountant on twitter said we need £25m income. So would think it gives us some wriggle room for players. We signed Anel in similar position financially.
 
Bladezz said:
I would expect us to sell Anel / Souza and Archer goes back. That could bring in £40m+

Accountant on twitter said we need £25m income. So would think it gives us some wriggle room for players. We signed Anel in similar position financially.
Click to expand...
Loans will be very important to us next season,it's a good way to keep within budget and improve the squad at same time.
Teams get promoted on the back of loan players.Forest are one and Hull have done some real good business on the back of loans this season.
Accepted its no long term solution .
 
Eric_Brooks said:
Patino (MC) lefty
Click to expand...
18483756-0-image-a-1_1568492583887.jpg
 
Berkshire Blade said:
Archer is 9 million or so. 15 million for both Anel and Souza seems unlikely!!!
Click to expand...
I beleive (according to Accoutant on Twitter)

It’s £22m for our purchase and it’s a compulsory £18m buy back clause if we are relegated. So in effect a £4m loan fee. It was more to help Villa FFP.

So I believe it’s £18m for Archer. I thought £15m for Anel supposedly we turned down a good bid in January (not sure why). £10m for Souza was me pushing it 😂 and more hopeful we can find someone to take him off us.
 
Bladezz said:
I would expect us to sell Anel / Souza and Archer goes back. That could bring in £40m+

Accountant on twitter said we need £25m income. So would think it gives us some wriggle room for players. We signed Anel in similar position financially.
Click to expand...
Archer wasn’t included in his £25m figure.
 
Is there a limit on loans from one club ? Bournemouth have a squad full of experienced but not over the hill top end champ players looking for game time.
 
Bladezz said:
I beleive (according to Accoutant on Twitter)

It’s £22m for our purchase and it’s a compulsory £18m buy back clause if we are relegated. So in effect a £4m loan fee. It was more to help Villa FFP.

So I believe it’s £18m for Archer. I thought £15m for Anel supposedly we turned down a good bid in January (not sure why). £10m for Souza was me pushing it 😂 and more hopeful we can find someone to take him off us.
Click to expand...
It is much closer to £18m we have "bought" him, so the loan fee isn't as high as £4m as you have imagined
 
Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou said:
25m income? Bettis said other month we only needed to sell one asset (along with archer im guessing) so that figure surprises me.
Click to expand...
To be fair to El Accounto he did say he was guessing a break even figure and he thought we might run at a loss next year to try for an immediate return.
 
bonobo said:
Is there a limit on loans from one club ? Bournemouth have a squad full of experienced but not over the hill top end champ players looking for game time.
Click to expand...

2 loans from 1 club i believe?
 

Silent Blade said:
It is much closer to £18m we have "bought" him, so the loan fee isn't as high as £4m as you have imagined
Click to expand...
Not imagined mate.

The princes friend / Accoutant who to be fair is 100% accurate with figures is what I posted.

I don’t claim to know inner details of confidential contracts like some do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom