Rodley
Well-Known Member
5 games sounds a bit excessive to say the 'fan' grabbed him first. GLTTL.
Apparently he punched the air and got bitten by a dog though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
5 games sounds a bit excessive to say the 'fan' grabbed him first. GLTTL.
Over my head that one palApparently he punched the air and got bitten by a dog though![]()
![]()
Back to your poisonous best. I made some tentative comments on Long, based on comments by people who have been watching him perform well in a relegation-threatened team, and on my own earlier observation (directly behind the goal at the Kop end) of a skilful young keeper who played behind a poor defence, mainly well, before suffering a crisis of confidence as young keepers sometimes do. I was merely suggesting that serious consideration be given to keeping him at the Lane, by the people whose judgement I trust. Your clever-clever use of offensive nicknames and attacking points of view that I have never expressed demonstrate that you have little respect either for young footballers or your fellow Blades.
I’ve seen him play. He isn’t. Calamity George lacks all the basics, as noted time after time.
As for Little Louis, mixed feelings from supporters of a non-League team. Who’d have thought it? No reports, of course, on League One substitute Mustavim Back-Whiteman because we had the sense to get rid permanently.
Bringimback. Bringalltheuselessfuckersback.
View attachment 39335
Louis Vanarama.
Skilful? He can’t catch a football. On the odd occasion he isn’t frozen in the six yard box as the ball passes him by, he fumbles it or parries the shot straight into the path of the opposition. His fear of crosses equals that of Count Dracula. I saw him play a lot of games. There was little or no skill. Wishing it were otherwise is futile.
His performance on his debut was one of the worst I have ever seen.(Bladey Boybanders has been banging the drum for him to play, by the way. Sounds familiar?). He improved very little and well earned the title Calamity George. It was a long time before he got any stick from the fans. His lack of confidence stemmed directly from his lack of ability. He’s rubbish.
Reed, Long and Hussey are all out of contract so it's not entirely in United's hands whether they stay or not.
I wouldn't offer Reed or Hussey anything. Not sure about Long.
. Reading that. I don't think any of them would fit in our squad apart from long maybe????. Let's just release them and look for better players.Pre season this, pre season that...
What the fuck is up with some of these players and their fitness?
And let's get Hanson back. Absolutely top player.
Skilful? He can’t catch a football. On the odd occasion he isn’t frozen in the six yard box as the ball passes him by, he fumbles it or parries the shot straight into the path of the opposition. His fear of crosses equals that of Count Dracula. I saw him play a lot of games. There was little or no skill. Wishing it were otherwise is futile.
Long is an experienced first team keeper now. 169 first team appearances under his belt.
I'm sure we would not recognise the unhappy young lad who left us last year.
Difficult one for Wilder to judge. There is a very good keeper in there somewhere. Whether there is a good keeper with the temperament to play for a big club is another matter.
The first 6 words of your post show that you are on a wind-up or a vendetta for reasons I do not understand. When I first saw Long in the Academy, behind a strong defence including Maguire and Kennedy, one of the things which impressed me was how he came for crosses and caught the ball with confidence. Behind a dodgy League 1 defence, as a gangly teenager against some burly attackers, he did have problems, but the ability is there, and on the evidence of the comments from Wimbledon, now he is an experienced keeper, there is a case for looking at whether we seek to develop his potential further. That is all I said. How do you justify your opening comment?Skilful? He can’t catch a football. On the odd occasion he isn’t frozen in the six yard box as the ball passes him by, he fumbles it or parries the shot straight into the path of the opposition. His fear of crosses equals that of Count Dracula. I saw him play a lot of games. There was little or no skill. Wishing it were otherwise is futile.
His performance on his debut was one of the worst I have ever seen.(Bladey Boybanders has been banging the drum for him to play, by the way. Sounds familiar?). He improved very little and well earned the title Calamity George. It was a long time before he got any stick from the fans. His lack of confidence stemmed directly from his lack of ability. He’s rubbish.
Has any footballer in the history of Football taken as long as Lavery to get back to “full fitness” seems to have spent his entire time under contract with us in the state of “not fully fit”
Let’s look at those points objectively shall we.
“He can’t catch a football” – he clearly can, anyone that can’t wouldn’t be playing regularly as a goalkeeper. He will occasionally make an error.
“On the odd occasion he doesn’t freeze in the box” – he has just been arguably the best player in a club that’s done well to avoid relegation. That he had confidence issues with us was clear, but let’s not pretend that being part of a relegation-threatened team, where any mistake might cost the team a goal responsible for its relegation, is somehow an easy, safe, pressure-free environment.
“He fumbles it or parries the shot straight into the path of the opposition” – you could accuse Moore and Blackman of being guilty of both at times this season.
“Wishing otherwise is futile” – blindly sticking to a view in the face of evidence that undermines it is more futile. Shock though it may be, it is possible for a player at 24 to have improved from what he was up till then.
For what it's worth, my instinct is never to give up on people. Some of his posts are good, and if he would only give up on the 2 or 3 wind-up postures he adopts constantly, for reasons I cannot fathom and he will never explain, we would be able to engage properly with his views. And I feel the need to speak up every time he attributes views to the majority of us, which are in fact views that nobody has expressed. Occasional visitors to the Forum would get a strange view of us lot if they took literally what he says. Mind you, we are a pretty strange lot...I assume you must be arguing with Pinchy.
I genuinely don't understand why anyone still engages with that boring troll.
For what it's worth, my instinct is never to give up on people. Some of his posts are good, and if he would only give up on the 2 or 3 wind-up postures he adopts constantly, for reasons I cannot fathom and he will never explain, we would be able to engage properly with his views. And I feel the need to speak up every time he attributes views to the majority of us, which are in fact views that nobody has expressed. Occasional visitors to the Forum would get a strange view of us lot if they took literally what he says. Mind you, we are a pretty strange lot...
Ched Evans this time around
James Wallace
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?