Loan player missing out?

[Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou]

Been mentioned but with having 6 loans currently, who misses out? I think we should try make one a permanent signing so then we can have them all involved as we need everyone as much as possible. (They're all fit and available at the minute)

Gilchrist
Clarke
Holding
Choudhury
Rak-Sakyi
BBD

 

[DifferentClass]

Can we even make loans permanent outside the window?

 

[ancientblade]

Been mentioned but with having 6 loans currently, who misses out? I think we should try make one a permanent signing so then we can have them all involved as we need everyone as much as possible. (They're all fit and available at the minute)

Gilchrist
Clarke
Holding
Choudhury
Rak-Sakyi
BBD

dont think it will matter forced to be one of the 6 out injured every week

 

[Blademan89]

Can we even make loans permanent outside the window?

Think Cappy mentioned in a previous thread that you can turn them into a permanent outside the window.

 

[LudlamBlade]

Can we even make loans permanent outside the window?

Yep. Didn't realise myself but another few posters have confirmed it on other threads

 

[LudlamBlade]

Been mentioned but with having 6 loans currently, who misses out? I think we should try make one a permanent signing so then we can have them all involved as we need everyone as much as possible. (They're all fit and available at the minute)

Gilchrist
Clarke
Holding
Choudhury
Rak-Sakyi
BBD

Personally if we're ever in a place where injuries/suspensions mean we need all of them, I'd drop JRS or Choudhury (depending on positions needing covering)

Wouldn't feel overly comfortable with 3 out of 4 in our backline being loans at the same time

 

[davidblade]

even if the clubs don’t want to sell we could do a deal similar to the Cam Archer deal where the is a buy back clause in the deal

 

[bakeblade]

Personally if we're ever in a place where injuries/suspensions mean we need all of them, I'd drop JRS or Choudhury (depending on positions needing covering)

Wouldn't feel overly comfortable with 3 out of 4 in our backline being loans at the same time

I'd leave Gilchrist out on Saturday.
Anel can cover RB if needed

 

[Balham]

I'd leave Gilchrist out on Saturday.
Anel can cover RB if needed

If we're desperate, RB cover would be Choudhury rather than Ahmedhodzic. Hasn't Holding filled in at RB in the past too?

 

[Uganda Blade]

Personally if we're ever in a place where injuries/suspensions mean we need all of them, I'd drop JRS or Choudhury (depending on positions needing covering)

Wouldn't feel overly comfortable with 3 out of 4 in our backline being loans at the same time

Wasn't Choudhury Wilder's No.1 target?

 

[KOPPO]

buy BB diaz then everyone can play..utb..

 

[bakeblade]

If we're desperate, RB cover would be Choudhury rather than Ahmedhodzic. Hasn't Holding filled in at RB in the past too?

Maybe but Anel definitely has, then put Holding at RCB.
I wouldn't be surprised if moving forward we have Holding at RCB and Anel LCB

 

[Farnboroughblade]

Sad I know, but I’m quite looking forward to the team sheet coming out on satdy.

 

[FredZeppelin]

Easy question if it's just a case of leaving one out of the match day squad. (I know it isn't/won't be!)

Rak-Sakyi for me. Just doesn't seem to have the desire to affect games or get really involved how we'd expect him too.

I wouldn't have been unhappy if he'd gone back to Palace.

Not my cup of tea.

utb

 

[CaptainMorgans]

With everyone fit, starting XI.

..........................Cooper
...Clarke....Holding.....Anel....Burrows
................Souza.....Hamer
.........JRS.........O'Hare......BBD
.......................Campbell

9 Subs: A Davies, Seriki, McCallum, Robinson, Choudhury, T Davies, S Peck, Moore, Cannon.

No room for RND, Gilchrist, A Brooks, Brewster or Oné.

You could make a case that the bench doesn't need Peck, T Davies and Choudhury... and maybe A Brooks as a more natural wide man gets the nod..

You could even make a shout for Brewster as he's shown some positional versatility... but ultimately I think that 20 is the best we have and we're hopefully not too far away from having them all available.

The best chance we have of creating goals is having Hamer & O'Hare on the pitch together and neither player belongs out wide.
Tough call to leave Choudhury out, but needs must. Hamer's our best player, we need him progressing the ball through the middle of the pitch.
Give him the keys to run the show.

(if JRS's form doesn't pick-up, I'd be very, very tempted to see what Seriki can do further forward. But I doubt Wilder shares that enthusiasm).

 

[Rufus Smalls]

Easy question if it's just a case of leaving one out of the match day squad. (I know it isn't/won't be!)

Rak-Sakyi for me. Just doesn't seem to have the desire to affect games or get really involved how we'd expect him too.

I wouldn't have been unhappy if he'd gone back to Palace.

Not my cup of tea.

utb

Can see your point. He sort of gets involved, looks decent in short spells, then goes missing for long periods.

Not the consistency we were hoping for.

 

[BrisBlade]

JRS this week. If Seriki is back in the squad after that, maybe Gilchrist. Then rotate based on form, injuries, workload, and what the squad needs each game. I really don't see competition for places as an issue.

 

[LudlamBlade]

Wasn't Choudhury Wilder's No.1 target?

I've honestly got no idea what I was saying there, just re-read it and I've suggested leaving out one of the midfield loans...because I don't feel comfortable with half of the backline being loans

 

[Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou]

We've got 7 players injured/doubts for Monday and none of them are the 6 loan players.

We actually could do with Gilchrist in the squad now aswell.