Sothall_Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,756
- Reaction score
- 8,630
I am surprised his record wasn't better, considering the squad at his disposal
Well, I don't think you can criticise his record in the season when he first took over and took us from the bottom half to 8th.
The following season he had to reduce the wage bill and sell the likes of Hulse, Armstrong, Tonge and Beattie to bring in a transfer profit. He still got us to 3rd.
The season after that he was forced to rebuild the entire defence after the loss of Kenny, Naysmith, Naughton, Walker and Kilgallon. We finished 8th.
I think on the whole you couldn't reasonably expect much better results than those he achieved with the squads at his disposal in each season.
What you can criticise him for is firstly the unattractive and generally negative style of play.
Secondly, that he took a very short-term approach to recruitment when trying to replace the players he was forced to sell.
I.e. Bringing in around 11 loan defenders last season, rather than buying one or two permanent replacements.
How much of this was down to him and how much was down to "The Board" is open to debate
But a stronger, better manager (such as Warnock) would certainly have insisted on being able to buy rather than loan so many players.