He's been utter garbage for weeks, but you could see how upset he was with himself tonight. There's no need for pricks chanting wanker at him either
"pricks chanting wanker" - that sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy if ever I heard one?
I didn't hear any of that, but then again, I sit in the South Stand and we don't use such language in there you see. I don't think any player deserves that abuse from their own fans tbh. The way I see it honestly is this..
He's a big physical presence in defence. When we signed him he gave us something we haven't had since Harry Maguire left, in that respect. He joined the team at a time when we started on an incredibly successful run, which also coincided with the inclusion of Coutts and Fleck in that midfield. We've not just won games since then, but due to that excellent midfield, and I include Duffy in that (even though he was below par tonight) the lads at the back, including the goalkeeper, have had it pretty easy. We've dominated teams, not just beat them. But, of late, when teams have got a bit wise to us, especially those that are able to defend in numbers and launch rapid counter attacks, he's had a bit more to do. The cracks have started to show. He's not infallible by any means and to be honest, he's pretty average for League 1 - which is why he's playing here and not in the Championship.
I said when we were talking about trying to extend his loan a few months ago that I'd be pleased if we could do that - because I think continuity is also a good thing rather than keep disrupting the team with new players - but also that if he didn't sign I wouldn't be too disappointed because I didn't think he was anything special - just o.k. and doing a decent job.
O'Connell is a far better centre half imo. He wins every header that kid and can also carry the ball forward - whereas EEL is always keen to pass it sideways or lump one up front.
He's been at Wolves since he was 9 years old. They know all about him. They don't choose to play him in the Championship. We are now learning why.