Always interesting to read these things when an impending transfer of a player like Killa appears. No doubt the dirrties had the same debate before he came to us and no doubt, as with every club at whatever the level, the debate exonerates the player from any involvement or say in the possible transfer.
It's the agent pushing for a move (who the hell does said agent work for?), the club want to sell him (he has a contract and can say no, which might happen in this case), his contract is almost up and they need to sell or he will leave for nothing (if the player wants to stay he'll sign an extension or new contract, or he'll decide not to bother, leave for nothing and get a hefty signing -on fee).
My point in all this, is that there are plenty saying that the club have to keep Killa, that it shows a lack of ambition if he leaves, that it shows McCabe is now more interested in balancing the books all as if the player is a complete slave and has no control over the situation. Reality is that players have more control over these things than they've ever had and can pretty much decide their own fate, irrespective of what clubs, agents or chairman want (especially at this level, more so above in the PL).
Just like Bambi at Man Utd in the summer, if the player decides he wants away, it will happen eventually. The offer will come or the contract will expire, but either way the player gets the move he wants, and the club can do NOTHING. I've a strong feeling that Killa is a lesser version of Ronaldo!