JJBlade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 5,633
- Reaction score
- 8,837
Talking complete and utter bollocks again![]()
![]()
You should get some help for it if it bothers you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Talking complete and utter bollocks again![]()
![]()
You should get some help for it if it bothers you
Apart from you of course who it appears seems to be the only 'fan' to see through this ploy and want the club to be run 'properly'?
As a fan I'd love us to keep Berge but financially if we are offered a decent amount of money for him (I can't quantify this but my opinion is that in excess of £20m is a good deal for someone who has hardly set the world alight in a relegated team and will be worth around £15m in the accounts) and it allows us to bring in good players then it might be a good thing to do.
I apologise if I am just being a 'backward retarded Sheffield fuckwit' but to me it makes no sense carrying the cost of a player we can't afford if we can cash him in satisfactorily.
We wouldn’t be losing anything. His contract has been amortised down to about to around £15m so £20m would represent a profit.Who said anything about Berge ?
And anything over £20 million ?????
Really ?
You'd take £20 million and 1p
Lose £2.5 million
And then lecture me about financial stability for the club
We wouldn’t be losing anything. His contract has been amortised down to about to around £15m so £20m would represent a profit.
I would definitely take £20m and his wages off the books, he’s been crocked half the season and did very little since his transfer to justify what we paid.
We paid £22.5m, when you buy a player you pay for them over the life of the contract so we’ve had 18 months worth of ‘value’ out of him. He’s therefore ‘cost’ £7.5m so far (he’s on a 4.5 year contract).Yeah OK
Signed for £22.5 million
Paid about £2 million in salary
£15 -20 million sale = Loss
And if in some weird way its a profit we've got Genks sell on fee to consider
That’s good news. How do you know?Every player at our club has one. He won't be an exception.
We paid £22.5m, when you buy a player you pay for them over the life of the contract so we’ve had 18 months worth of ‘value’ out of him. He’s therefore ‘cost’ £7.5m so far (he’s on a 4.5 year contract).
His value in the accounts is £15m so if we sell him for £20m we’ve made £5m profit (granted there might be a sell on fee to Genk to come out of this).
Wages are an operating cost so are irrelevant in any profit/loss calcs on his sale.
Their clubs are competent in negotiation and/or the player is worth more than they were initially bought for.Yes, I get it
So why do players move on for more than they were bought for then ?
Selling him for £15 - 20 million is bleeding stupid
“All of our players have relegation clauses in their contracts. That puts us in a stronger position financially.”That’s good news. How do you know?
Fair enough“All of our players have relegation clauses in their contracts. That puts us in a stronger position financially.”
From Bettis today.
I couldn’t possibly say how I know, or id have to kill you![]()
No thanks. It’s for my armpits.Henning?
Unless you need the money.Yes, I get it
So why do players move on for more than they were bought for then ?
Selling him for £15 - 20 million is bleeding stupid
Unless you need the money.
Profit/loss is almost irrelevant most of the time, cash flow never is!
So you're the clubs finance director now and you have a perfect handle on our cash flow situation?Yes, but we don't
So you're the clubs finance director now and you have a perfect handle on our cash flow situation?
Maybe have a chat with Mr Chansiri as he shares your beliefs about not selling players to assist cash flow, and it's working well for him.
Still be better than Lundstram..He’s just had a kidney transplant so it’s unlikely
Totally agree. I don't totally understand but I totally agree.No one will buy joc Egan will take big money to present away
As the man with a wooden leg said its all a matter of opinionwe shouldnt accept anything less than 25m for berge otherwise he stays interesting one is egan i would say 20m minimum for him yet a poster on here last week said we would be lucky to get 10m for him all about opinions i suppose
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?