KeyffSmyff
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 3,127
- Reaction score
- 3,347
Independent Article yep say average time the ball is in play is 59mins.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Totally agreed with the above one I would like to add to the list is the compulsory deduction of 1 weeks wages by every player in the Premier League once a year to be invested into the NHS and other public servicesPearl Jam's best record
Independent timekeeping. If the independent timekeeper determines that a team is deliberately timewasting, the team infringed against has the option to add on three times the amount of time wasted.
If someone does not retreat 10 yards quickly from a free kick then you can kick the ball at them and take a new free kick at the point of contact.
Only the captain can talk to the referee unless spoken to.
Pearl Jam's best record
Independent timekeeping. If the independent timekeeper determines that a team is deliberately timewasting, the team infringed against has the option to add on three times the amount of time wasted.
If someone does not retreat 10 yards quickly from a free kick then you can kick the ball at them and take a new free kick at the point of contact.
Only the captain can talk to the referee unless spoken to.
Hmmmmm, this takes some beating....................
Abolish all fouls except handball, set ball on fire, arm the players, managers must duel to the death while suspended on bungee ropes above the pitch, winner gets a +1 on goal difference. And to appease all the woke folk, lesbian show at halftime with birds from every ethnic group going at it, hard. Programmes reduced to a quid. I know that last one is a bit far fetched but one can dream
Best team game ever developed.
As it stands now needs less rules and more a change in attitude of the players and managements to play the game in, for the sake of a better word, a more Corinthian way and not a win at all costs way.
Pearl Jam's best record
Independent timekeeping. If the independent timekeeper determines that a team is deliberately timewasting, the team infringed against has the option to add on three times the amount of time wasted.
If someone does not retreat 10 yards quickly from a free kick then you can kick the ball at them and take a new free kick at the point of contact.
Only the captain can talk to the referee unless spoken to.
2 var referrals per team from the manager, absolutely zero ref baiting. Ref baiting, appealing incorrectly or otherwise, create points after the match. Dodgy missed tackles, shithousing, falling over under a challenge and handballing all get looked at afterwards with points applied to players and bans following.
Offside was introduced to stop goal hanging. Obvious (daylight) offsides only, and inside the penalty area only. Would be worth a trial.
Can only Loan out 5 players per year to stop Chelsea etc.
Totally agreed with the above one I would like to add to the list is the compulsory deduction of 1 weeks wages by every player in the Premier League once a year to be invested into the NHS and other public services
Yeah agreed they are on the higher tax bands but when their accountant does a bit of offshore work for them I am sure they still make a fortune too. I personally think it's bonkers when a starting salary for a NHS nurse is £24,907 per year before tax with student debt hanging over you. The average wage of a Premier League footballer is reported to be £60,000 a week (approx £3million a year + addons) based on the no add ons take home pay would be £30,792 per week. I am sure they could be without that for 1 week a year and that's just a mean average wage.They pay a fortune in tax as it is
Just as addition to this based on approx guesses of weekly wages at all Premier league clubs via a stats site for 21/22 season by deducting a base salary weeks wage from each player it would raise in the region of £24million per year (they would still have their addons and image rights etc) . That would go a long way to the recruitment and retention of social care and other NHS servicesYeah agreed they are on the higher tax bands but when their accountant does a bit of offshore work for them I am sure they still make a fortune too. I personally think it's bonkers when a starting salary for a NHS nurse is £24,907 per year before tax with student debt hanging over you. The average wage of a Premier League footballer is reported to be £60,000 a week (approx £3million a year + addons) based on the no add ons take home pay would be £30,792 per week. I am sure they could be without that for 1 week a year and that's just a mean average wage.
Why footballers specifically? Why not all rich people?Just as addition to this based on approx guesses of weekly wages at all Premier league clubs via a stats site for 21/22 season by deducting a base salary weeks wage from each player it would raise in the region of £24million per year (they would still have their addons and image rights etc) . That would go a long way to the recruitment and retention of social care and other NHS services
Why not indeed. I totally agree I was mainly just using it as an example as easy to get data but if you went down the route of "social media influencers" and the like I am sure even more could be added to that funding pot. The times you hear on the news that a health facility is closing due to lack of funding etc is tragic yet throughout all of their lives I am sure they and their families have used the NHS and take the services for granted. James Dyson is on reportly £3million a year and that's what is declared in this country. I am sure he wouldn't miss £60,000 a yearWhy footballers specifically? Why not all rich people?
At last, someone talking sense on here.Abolish all fouls except handball, set ball on fire, arm the players, managers must duel to the death while suspended on bungee ropes above the pitch, winner gets a +1 on goal difference. And to appease all the woke folk, lesbian show at halftime with birds from every ethnic group going at it, hard. Programmes reduced to a quid. I know that last one is a bit far fetched but one can dream
Yeah, chucking more money at the NHS would definitely solve all its problems.Why not indeed. I totally agree I was mainly just using it as an example as easy to get data but if you went down the route of "social media influencers" and the like I am sure even more could be added to that funding pot. The times you hear on the news that a health facility is closing due to lack of funding etc is tragic yet throughout all of their lives I am sure they and their families have used the NHS and take the services for granted. James Dyson is on reportly £3million a year and that's what is declared in this country. I am sure he wouldn't miss £60,000 a year
No loan signings ...
It would certainly solve some of them. For example, providing bursaries for nursing training so there was more staff available, not pretending you can run a service that has to react quickly to changes in demand in the same way as you can run a commercial business that employs mainly low skilled workers, considering having separate hospitals for infectious diseases (which would require building them), actually having a reserve of PPE instead of relying on JIT principles (which can be fine in manufacturing).Yeah, chucking more money at the NHS would definitely solve all its problems.
In an of itself it would solve nothing, because the bean-counters that run it would just squander it. It needs additional funding but it needs proper management, from the Health Secretary downwards, so that it's run properly, effectively and efficiently.It would certainly solve some of them. For example, providing bursaries for nursing training so there was more staff available, not pretending you can run a service that has to react quickly to changes in demand in the same way as you can run a commercial business that employs mainly low skilled workers, considering having separate hospitals for infectious diseases (which would require building them), actually having a reserve of PPE instead of relying on JIT principles (which can be fine in manufacturing).
The idea of an “efficient” NHS is a myth produced by accountants who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing and propagated by politicians for their own political ends.
Which specific areas would you say could be managed better and how? For example, if you need to have 20 staff to run a ward in peak times, you need 20 staff at all times, because you can’t always predict when the peaks are, and you can’t hire and fire staff at random, because they need training and experience, it’s not like crop farming when you can hire a load of labourers to pick your potatoes on short term contracts.In an of itself it would solve nothing, because the bean-counters that run it would just squander it. It needs additional funding but it needs proper management, from the Health Secretary downwards, so that it's run properly, effectively and efficiently.
To me the NHS is the single biggest source of pride in this country: the idea that anyone, regardless of means, can get access to appropriate healthcare without being billed at the point of need shows a society that is advanced, empathetic and just generally sensible. The reality of the NHS is, in my experience, far removed from that. Much like the BBC, it's an example of success* despite everything, not because of it. That's not the fault of most of the people, by the way, for whom I have nothing but respect.
*sadly it's limited success, in many cases
I'm sure we have something already that performs this role, it's called Income Tax.Why not indeed. I totally agree I was mainly just using it as an example as easy to get data but if you went down the route of "social media influencers" and the like I am sure even more could be added to that funding pot. The times you hear on the news that a health facility is closing due to lack of funding etc is tragic yet throughout all of their lives I am sure they and their families have used the NHS and take the services for granted. James Dyson is on reportly £3million a year and that's what is declared in this country. I am sure he wouldn't miss £60,000 a year
Inter- and intra-departmental communication for one thing. I agree that the example you gave is completely valid and that staffing isn't as simple as any other business, because it's not just any other business. That said, it'd be great if my GP could effectively and efficiently talk to the various specialists I've been peddled around over the years, so that a holistic picture could be built up and accurate measures taken, rather than endless repetition of the same tests and interventions because the new doctor doesn't have a clue that they've been done before.Which specific areas would you say could be managed better and how? For example, if you need to have 20 staff to run a ward in peak times, you need 20 staff at all times, because you can’t always predict when the peaks are, and you can’t hire and fire staff at random, because they need training and experience, it’s not like crop farming when you can hire a load of labourers to pick your potatoes on short term contracts.
I agree any additional spending needs to be strategically targeted and there’s no point just throwing money at it but let’s not pretend it’s adequately funded right now.
Even after income tax the average weekly wage of a Premiership footballer is over £30K as a means average whilst a nurse is under that per year before tax. I know who I would rather have more of.I'm sure we have something already that performs this role, it's called Income Tax.
I wonder what the thinkings were about the current size agreed with you on the diving side of things. It would make for a packed box when it comes to corners in the last minute etcStrange one but i'd reduce the size of the penalty area. Doesn't seem fair to me that you can get a free shot at goal from 12 yards after being fouled 18 yards from goal or from an impossible angle.
Will hopefully reduce the amount of diving as currently as soon as a player reaches the penalty area now they'll looking for and in most occasions are initiating contact.
A larger capacity contact centre when demand is high etc also ways that could help!Even after income tax the average weekly wage of a Premiership footballer is over £30K as a means average whilst a nurse is under that per year before tax. I know who I would rather have more of.
They could even do it on a voluntary basis to charities of their choice if like some believe the NHS doesn't need any more cash. The main point of the argument is footballers are paid far too much money for too little return. Retire at 35, 38 if you are lucky and if you don't want to and sit back on the cash "earnt" by working class people paying however much for a season ticket and merchandise.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?