For those who remember 1976 - 1981

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

The BIG difference between then and now is McWobblegob he's the best we've had...... what a fookin bullshiting two hat !

He must be skint to behave the way he has with The Blades...................... the more i think about it the more plausible the theory is.
 

i'm coming to the opinion he is another rich on paper fur coat no knickers type just like the cardboard millionaires we've had before like macdonald, brealey, woolhouse, wragg etc.. i could be wrong though.. ffs kev.. say summat!!
 
i'm coming to the opinion he is another rich on paper fur coat no knickers type just like the cardboard millionaires we've had before like macdonald, brealey, woolhouse, wragg etc.. i could be wrong though.. ffs kev.. say summat!!

Woolhouse really was a crook but Wragg and Brealey were simply too small time to keep funding the club beyond a certain level even if theyd wanted to. McCabe might have been wealthy but if alot of that was tied up in property hed have taken a bath in the last couple of years. Hes probably skint now.
 
>The BDM scarred many of us
but it is what makes us blades.. i could never understand how the pigs can sing 'we will fight for evermore because of boxing day'.. they won the game.. why would they need to fight for evermore.. why do they always rob our songs?? make your own up!!

I suspect it's as a result of inbreeding. The Porcine line is not rich with diversity nor originality.
Agree about the thrust of the song lyric though. It should say, "and we'll be shite forevermore becuase of bxng day."
 
Woolhouse really was a crook but Wragg and Brealey were simply too small time to keep funding the club beyond a certain level even if theyd wanted to. McCabe might have been wealthy but if alot of that was tied up in property hed have taken a bath in the last couple of years. Hes probably skint now.

we should have sympathy for Wragg if the story, about a L**ds director promising Wragg that he would vote him to the FA committee if he agreed to sell Mick Jones to L**ds in sept 67, is true
 
"another rich on paper fur coat no knickers type"

That's brilliant but can I ask what exactly is another rich on paper fur coat no knickers type?
 
we should have sympathy for Wragg if the story, about a L**ds director promising Wragg that he would vote him to the FA committee if he agreed to sell Mick Jones to L**ds in sept 67, is true

No we shouldnt. Tricky Dicky was going to sell us out to get his feet under an FA table if that story is true. "Send Dick Wragg to Vietnam", as my dad sung at the time...
 
I am distantly, very distantly as it goes, related to the Wragg family. Knowledge in the family has always been that Richard Wragg was always more interested in climbing the FA than anything connected with SUFC. Selling Mick Jones to get in at Lancaster Gate (as it was then) wouldn't be a surprise. Then again he was always very chummy with Revie and was the one who insisted he get the England job when others were pushing for Clough.
 
>That's brilliant but can I ask what exactly is another rich on paper fur coat no knickers type?
a fur coat no knickers type is someone who pretends to be rich but isn't really it is all a facade.. (have you never heard that?.. that is classic sheffield-ish?) rich on paper is property types who's assets make them look rich 'on paper' but have no actual disposable wealth.. so put them together and..
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom