You say that, but business (epsecially retail businesses) often issue people with bans because it elevates subsequent offences from theft/assult/whatever to theft/assault/whatever with tresspass (aka Burglary or Aggrevated Buglary).
You get a slap on the wrist for one, and potentially jail for the other, so it's a no brainer to issue (eg) a shoplifter with a ban on the first occasion, then press for a buglary charge the next time they do it.
Persistent standing (for eg) & some other shit Clubs will ban you for are NOT criminal acts. So the club CAN'T escalate the next time in the way you describe. They can of course ask you to leave. Which you should politely do.
I think you're both slightly wrong
Standing absolutely isn't a criminal act, but Flawed's suggestion is that if a club bans someone from their ground then, if they're found to have breached that ban, they can be found guilty of trespass. Which again isn't criminal in this case, but
is an 'escalation'. Also, if someone is found in breach of a club ban the club absolutely could seek redress in the courts, it's just a civil matter.
That said, Flawed also seems to be suggesting that if the club feels the person has the potential to commit a criminal offence in the future (such as assault) then the fact that they are also trespassing would be an aggravating factor which would increase the seriousness of the offence. I don't see that in the
Sentencing Guidelines. Also, I don't think 'assault with trespass' is a thing and 'aggravated burglary' is specifically related to the use of weapons (perhaps he's thinking of the fact that theft + trespass = burglary, but that's a specific thing not really relevant to standing at football).
However! If someone has been banned from the club, goes to a game anyway, and intimidates, obstructs or disrupts people partaking in a 'lawful activity' then that could be considered Aggravated Trespass, which
is a
criminal offence. You could potentially make a case that standing & blocking people's view, shouting etc, would fall under that - even if the actions would not be criminal if the person wasn't trespassing.
I think. I'm no lawyer. I only came on here to discuss the Derby game...