SouthEssexBlade
...for wit and sage wisdom
As with most breakthroughs in sport Rugby League have used them for some time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
The oft-quoted average for outfield players is 7 miles in a game, a bit more than 10k.I would be really interested to know how far they actually run in a game. I just don't believe that the majority of players are running about 10k in a game.
Does anyone have any idea as to realistic figures when they play with a GPS tracker on?
Pro-Zone at a guess.
Assuming a pitch is 100 meters long a player would have to run from one end to the other 100 times during a game and that is just unrealistic. A wing back might be closest and do the most, but during a 90 minute game where the ball is in play for possibly 60 minutes, he would have to be constantly running and very few players are.You could easily do 10k in a game, I do about half an hour on the treadmill in the gym at a fairly steady pace and that is usually around 5k
Assuming a pitch is 100 meters long a player would have to run from one end to the other 100 times during a game and that is just unrealistic. A wing back might be closest and do the most, but during a 90 minute game where the ball is in play for possibly 60 minutes, he would have to be constantly running and very few players are.
I might be completely wrong but I just don't believe the figures
Rugby union has been using this system for ages. Check out more recent 6 nations games Football is lagging behind .
These effing parachutes are small.That would be a good image for a caption competition!![]()
Well, how does prozone work it out?
could have done with GPS in the play off final ball,then we might be able to find simmos penaltyDidn't notice it but it sounds like GPS.
I'm pretty certain they use this in training.
Must've got special dispensation to use it in the game. Makes sense: if both teams thought they could benefit then neither would object.
Assuming a pitch is 100 meters long a player would have to run from one end to the other 100 times during a game and that is just unrealistic. A wing back might be closest and do the most, but during a 90 minute game where the ball is in play for possibly 60 minutes, he would have to be constantly running and very few players are.
I might be completely wrong but I just don't believe the figures
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?