Cracking stat...

[Kozzy_is_my_Dad]

Stats can be manipulated to present various meanings, but this one interested me from the premier league matchpack on Sky:

Fewest shots on target per goal:
Manchester City 2.04
Sheffield United 2.14
Liverpool 2.18
Bournemouth 2.27

So, only City are more efficient than we are. For all the frustration at chances missed, we're the second most effective with the chances we do get. The stats are skewed in that City have scored far more than we have, and we'll get far fewer chances this year, so we need to take them.

 

[Worksop II]

Thats because most of Didsy's chances go wide .........

/tinhaton

 

[JackSUFC]

Well we won 2-0 with one shot Saturday. More of the same this weekend

 

[BigBed]

I'd take a 4-0 win with 30 shots now!!

 

[BushBlade]

Stats can be manipulated to present various meanings, but this one interested me from the premier league matchpack on Sky:

Fewest shots on target per goal:
Manchester City 2.04
Sheffield United 2.14
Liverpool 2.18
Bournemouth 2.27

So, only City are more efficient than we are. For all the frustration at chances missed, we're the second most effective with the chances we do get. The stats are skewed in that City have scored far more than we have, and we'll get far fewer chances this year, so we need to take them.

Sorry, but, from a statistical perspective, the sample size is too small; we haven’t played enough games yet.

 

[Greasy Chap Butty]

Well we won 2-0 with one shot Saturday. More of the same this weekend

That puts us top of the league , 0.5 shots per goal!

 

[Woodwardfan]

Our stats for 'goals on target' as a ratio against 'attempts on goal" will surely be amongst the worst.

 

[GRUMPY BLADE]

I'd take a 4-0 win with 30 shots now!!

Sorry but 2-0 to VAR, I mean the scousers.