Deadly_D'Jaffo
Well-Known Member
When he wanted more money his performances had dropped off and he couldn't last beyond 60 minutes.
How much of an increase did he ask for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
When he wanted more money his performances had dropped off and he couldn't last beyond 60 minutes.
Asked for longer, not more lucrative.How much of an increase did he ask for?
No problem whatsoever with asking for better terms. Had he not just signed a much improved contract?
He had a year left on his contract.Yes, if memory serves, he had signed a new contract.
Agreed that there was a year left on his contract but what was being asked for is less clear cut depending on whether you believe Duffy or Wilder's account.Asked for longer, not more lucrative.
He had a year left on his contract.
A years wages.How much of an increase did he ask for?
As much as I’d like to see him back his boat has sailed and I bet he wishes he never listened to his dad.Get duffs signed back up, i know hes a few years older but he doesnt need pace, just plop him behind the strikers and let him weave his his magic, lovely footballer and with hindsight players of his ilk are really hard to find!
A years wages.
His subsequent career proved Wilder right to deny him.
My issue with the 'greedy Mark Duffy' rhetoric is that at the time an infallible Chris Wilder instigated it, so fans jumped on it without knowing the full facts (like myself I may add).
If Duffy asked for parity alongside other, vital members of our back to back promotion side (e.g. Basham, Sharp, JOC, Fleck) then he had a fair shout imo as he proved himself pivotal to our success despite numerous, failed attempts to dislodge him.
I can't remember the contract situations at the time but if, say, Duffy looked at Billy Sharp and thought "I carry similar value to the team as Billy, so I want a similar deal" then that'd have been fair. If he looked at Billy and thought "I deserve more then him" then that's a different story.
Why was Wilder so tough on Duffy but not on Lundstram?
Wilder was also one to be very interested in getting new contracts himself...
The biggest mystery..Why was Wilder so tough on Duffy but not on Lundstram?
Wilder was also one to be very interested in getting new contracts himself...
Have to agree with every single word put thereI was a big fan of Duffy and Wilder, but virtually from the word go CW always seemed like he wanted to get a replacement in for Duff. First JTW he brought in Carruthers, then Ricky Holmes, then Freeman and finally Berge, and for me none of them have been anywhere near as good as Duffy. Only one who has got close is Diddsy and that's more as a drop off striker.
If Duff was playing I always thought he was worth the entrance fee alone. If there's any gas left in the tank, even just for 30 minute cameos I'd get him back for a year. Certain players just click at certain clubs, Duffy and United (i'd say Bramall Lane too as he always seemed to do it against us for the oppo too) just clicked. And of course he slayed the bouncing![]()
Had this argument elsewhere re Duffy/Lundstrom, something has gone on behind the scenes, and I would argue the performances would suggest its ongoing, if Wilder started it or failed to address it, him leaving hasn't seen a change in attitude, the criticism/blame re the training facilities doesn't add up, nothing has changed in that regard since the Championship & same as the first year in the PL , injuries loss of form and confidence haven't helped, but these are usually temporary, the loss of identity, belief and team spirit has been pretty much a regular featre all seasonWilder's stance on Duffy wanting an extension wouldn't be so questionable if it wasn't for the totally different way he handled Lundstram not wanting an extension, and also signing an extended much more lucrative contract himself not long after his previous extended more lucrative contract. With the players brought in after promotion, you could see why Duffy might want some assurances about his role, but it'd depend on how he went about that whether Wilder was right or wrong to freeze him out.
You could tell Wilder was a bit jealous of Duffy, but even going back to when he first arrived you could tell he was jealous of Brayford because right backs shouldn't earn that much money or be popular with fans (so dropped him after a couple of games then a year later got rid after shipping him out on loan and his online minions spinning tales of Brayford being a parasite draining money from the club).
Either way, I'd rather have a past it Duffy back than a past it Wilder.
Why was Wilder so tough on Duffy but not on Lundstram?
Wilder was also one to be very interested in getting new contracts himself...
Have to agree with every single word put there
Mark Duffy was an incredible footballer, the like I’d never seen in 30 years at the Lane.
just my opinion - but always felt as if Wilder had something personal against Duffy, almost a jealousy that the fans would show more love/appreciation towards Duffy than him....
5 contracts in 4 years
I didn't even realize it was that many. Don't begrudge him but... seriously?!
Wilder's stance on Duffy wanting an extension wouldn't be so questionable if it wasn't for the totally different way he handled Lundstram not wanting an extension, and also signing an extended much more lucrative contract himself not long after his previous extended more lucrative contract. With the players brought in after promotion, you could see why Duffy might want some assurances about his role, but it'd depend on how he went about that whether Wilder was right or wrong to freeze him out.
You could tell Wilder was a bit jealous of Duffy, but even going back to when he first arrived you could tell he was jealous of Brayford because right backs shouldn't earn that much money or be popular with fans (so dropped him after a couple of games then a year later got rid after shipping him out on loan and his online minions spinning tales of Brayford being a parasite draining money from the club).
Either way, I'd rather have a past it Duffy back than a past it Wilder.
Have to agree with every single word put there
Mark Duffy was an incredible footballer, the like I’d never seen in 30 years at the Lane.
just my opinion - but always felt as if Wilder had something personal against Duffy, almost a jealousy that the fans would show more love/appreciation towards Duffy than him....
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?