Conclusions from the Inter friendly

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Beans

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
2,452
Reaction score
14,659
Sure, drawing conclusions from friendlies can be difficult, but I've had a pop.

Plan is to do more written content this year along with the podcast, so if you're inclined to give my thoughts and opinions some of your time, here's some words on last night (click here if you'd prefer to read it in a slightly-nicer font on Medium :)

Conclusions from our friendly with Inter

Drawing meaningful conclusions from preseason friendlies can be tricky, verging on pointless, but hey, there’s still eleven days until the real stuff starts, so let’s give it a try anyway.

1) On that showing there’s little doubt in my mind that our fitness will be up to speed come the Swansea game. We played with a high press through most of the first half and went flying into pretty much every challenge — if this had been a league match, I think there would have been three or four yellow cards apiece. The intensity of our play and pressure was excellent, and if anything I was hoping we’d ease off a bit earlier than we did…


2) If you’re the kind of person to read something from friendly results (I can’t say I am), then a 1–1 draw with a strong Inter team is encouraging. Sure, they were missing their World Cup players, plus stars like Radja Nainggolan. And sure, they’re a few weeks behind us in terms of preseason preparation (their season kicks off August 19th). But this was still close to their first team, including the brilliant Mauro Icardi who’s scored 100 goals in just 159 Serie A games.

And while there were flashes of brilliance from him, Kwadwo Asamoah and Lautaro Martinez (what a pass to create the equaliser, by the way), United matched Inter well and restricted them to very few chances. Even if Icardi’s backheel for a teammate when in on goal felt rather charitable.


3) With no sign that Coutts will be ready to play any time soon, I’m pretty sure last night’s midfield three of Lundstram, Evans and Fleck will be the one to start against Swansea. I quite like this trio and they were excellent together in the Cardiff home game last season, even if the first two are still far from the finished article. But structurally I can see the logic: Evans plays a deeper, risk-free role, Lundstram can get up and down as the situation requires, and Fleck is released to play further up the pitch.


4) Speaking of Fleck… that performance last night was in keeping with how he played in the second half of last season. That is to say, extremely good. He really has become an all-action midfielder: carrying the ball forward, moving it on, making tackles. Last night he threw in a lovely run and assist for McGoldrick, and fizzed a dipping volley just wide from 25 yards. Some fans will want Duffy to start over Evans or Lundstram but if those two are deployed with the primary goal of freeing up Fleck to play a more attacking role, then that’s fine by me.


5) The early signs are promising for McGoldrick, who by most accounts (this is the first time I’ve seen him play for us) has been good in all three preseason appearances so far. His touch and link-up play were strong, particularly the backheel on the byline that almost created a chance for Clarke. His goal was superbly-taken, as he had to twist his body for Fleck’s pass which was actually played behind him. The finish was very classy.


6) While we absolutely need another striker — hence the pursuit of Martyn Waghorn, even if it looks like we’ll be priced out of it — McGoldrick is smart business. Yes, he has a history of injury problems. Yes, he turns 31 later this year. Yes, he’s only hit double-figures for league goals three times in his career. No, he probably won’t single-handedly fire us to promotion.

But he is a good player — even grumpy Ipswich fans acknowledge that. He cost us nothing. And the deal is structured in a way that incentivises him to do well (1 year, with an option for a second) but is also based around him playing a certain number of games. Basically, this is a low-risk signing with a potentially high upside, filling a squad role vacated by Clayton Donaldson’s departure (and if he avoids injuries, McGoldrick will be much more valuable than Donaldson).


7) I mentioned earlier that I don’t want to read too much into a friendly, and the standard of opposition is higher than we’ll likely face every week, even at 75% pace. But watching United last night did reiterate that we are, as it stands, much the same team as last season… for better or worse.

John Egan should address one of our major areas of need, which was a weakness in the air (look at some of the goals we conceded against Cardiff, Millwall, and Barnsley for example). Dean Henderson was flawless last night and his distribution looks very encouraging, based on 45 minutes. But attacking-wise, we still have the same issues that hurt us last season, through a lack of goals from other areas of the team (apart from Fleck, very few of our non-strikers got into attacking positions), and a general lack of pace or dynamism in all areas.

This is not news, of course — it’s the things we’ve been talking about for roughly six months. But with only two outfield players signed so far — one of which, McGoldrick, is likely a rotation player rather than a guaranteed starter — those problems still exist.

And we still do plenty of things well. Every single player from keeper to Clarke is comfortable on the ball and wants to get on it and play. The wingbacks get forward at every opportunity. Centre-backs look to play into feet rather than hitting long. Last night reminded me just how good we are to watch — but also that we may still struggle to create many chances when the season gets underway.


8) It’s worth pointing out that, as much as I’d like us to sign Waghorn, he wouldn’t necessarily solve our pace/creativity problems either. And there is still a week and a half before the season, and 2 weeks until the transfer deadline. And the loan window stays open until the end of August, and Wilder has already stated that he expects clubs to use this in slightly devious ways — namely loaning a player with the understanding that you’ll buy him in January, to get round the earlier deadline on permanent deals. Hopefully we can use that to our advantage if we haven’t got the players he wants by August 9th.​
 



...combining this and the unpopular opinions thread:

Yes, we applied ourselves really well, we looked neat and tidy, and organised. But we severely lacked pace and spark up front and that will catch up with us this season, if we don't address it. I expect us to be solid but uninspiring by and large, if I'm honest. If only we had someone who could play between the lines, break with pace, take on their man, offer the unpredictable.

You know, for a low wage, preferably home grown.

If only we had had that. If only.
 
Sure, drawing conclusions from friendlies can be difficult, but I've had a pop.

Plan is to do more written content this year along with the podcast, so if you're inclined to give my thoughts and opinions some of your time, here's some words on last night (click here if you'd prefer to read it in a slightly-nicer font on Medium :)

Conclusions from our friendly with Inter

Drawing meaningful conclusions from preseason friendlies can be tricky, verging on pointless, but hey, there’s still eleven days until the real stuff starts, so let’s give it a try anyway.

1) On that showing there’s little doubt in my mind that our fitness will be up to speed come the Swansea game. We played with a high press through most of the first half and went flying into pretty much every challenge — if this had been a league match, I think there would have been three or four yellow cards apiece. The intensity of our play and pressure was excellent, and if anything I was hoping we’d ease off a bit earlier than we did…


2) If you’re the kind of person to read something from friendly results (I can’t say I am), then a 1–1 draw with a strong Inter team is encouraging. Sure, they were missing their World Cup players, plus stars like Radja Nainggolan. And sure, they’re a few weeks behind us in terms of preseason preparation (their season kicks off August 19th). But this was still close to their first team, including the brilliant Mauro Icardi who’s scored 100 goals in just 159 Serie A games.

And while there were flashes of brilliance from him, Kwadwo Asamoah and Lautaro Martinez (what a pass to create the equaliser, by the way), United matched Inter well and restricted them to very few chances. Even if Icardi’s backheel for a teammate when in on goal felt rather charitable.


3) With no sign that Coutts will be ready to play any time soon, I’m pretty sure last night’s midfield three of Lundstram, Evans and Fleck will be the one to start against Swansea. I quite like this trio and they were excellent together in the Cardiff home game last season, even if the first two are still far from the finished article. But structurally I can see the logic: Evans plays a deeper, risk-free role, Lundstram can get up and down as the situation requires, and Fleck is released to play further up the pitch.


4) Speaking of Fleck… that performance last night was in keeping with how he played in the second half of last season. That is to say, extremely good. He really has become an all-action midfielder: carrying the ball forward, moving it on, making tackles. Last night he threw in a lovely run and assist for McGoldrick, and fizzed a dipping volley just wide from 25 yards. Some fans will want Duffy to start over Evans or Lundstram but if those two are deployed with the primary goal of freeing up Fleck to play a more attacking role, then that’s fine by me.


5) The early signs are promising for McGoldrick, who by most accounts (this is the first time I’ve seen him play for us) has been good in all three preseason appearances so far. His touch and link-up play were strong, particularly the backheel on the byline that almost created a chance for Clarke. His goal was superbly-taken, as he had to twist his body for Fleck’s pass which was actually played behind him. The finish was very classy.


6) While we absolutely need another striker — hence the pursuit of Martyn Waghorn, even if it looks like we’ll be priced out of it — McGoldrick is smart business. Yes, he has a history of injury problems. Yes, he turns 31 later this year. Yes, he’s only hit double-figures for league goals three times in his career. No, he probably won’t single-handedly fire us to promotion.

But he is a good player — even grumpy Ipswich fans acknowledge that. He cost us nothing. And the deal is structured in a way that incentivises him to do well (1 year, with an option for a second) but is also based around him playing a certain number of games. Basically, this is a low-risk signing with a potentially high upside, filling a squad role vacated by Clayton Donaldson’s departure (and if he avoids injuries, McGoldrick will be much more valuable than Donaldson).


7) I mentioned earlier that I don’t want to read too much into a friendly, and the standard of opposition is higher than we’ll likely face every week, even at 75% pace. But watching United last night did reiterate that we are, as it stands, much the same team as last season… for better or worse.

John Egan should address one of our major areas of need, which was a weakness in the air (look at some of the goals we conceded against Cardiff, Millwall, and Barnsley for example). Dean Henderson was flawless last night and his distribution looks very encouraging, based on 45 minutes. But attacking-wise, we still have the same issues that hurt us last season, through a lack of goals from other areas of the team (apart from Fleck, very few of our non-strikers got into attacking positions), and a general lack of pace or dynamism in all areas.

This is not news, of course — it’s the things we’ve been talking about for roughly six months. But with only two outfield players signed so far — one of which, McGoldrick, is likely a rotation player rather than a guaranteed starter — those problems still exist.

And we still do plenty of things well. Every single player from keeper to Clarke is comfortable on the ball and wants to get on it and play. The wingbacks get forward at every opportunity. Centre-backs look to play into feet rather than hitting long. Last night reminded me just how good we are to watch — but also that we may still struggle to create many chances when the season gets underway.


8) It’s worth pointing out that, as much as I’d like us to sign Waghorn, he wouldn’t necessarily solve our pace/creativity problems either. And there is still a week and a half before the season, and 2 weeks until the transfer deadline. And the loan window stays open until the end of August, and Wilder has already stated that he expects clubs to use this in slightly devious ways — namely loaning a player with the understanding that you’ll buy him in January, to get round the earlier deadline on permanent deals. Hopefully we can use that to our advantage if we haven’t got the players he wants by August 9th.​
I concur :)
 
Did Gary Sinclair invite people to get in touch with the club to sign up for a session with Captain Blade?

Could have sworn he said to contact him if you wanted to go out on the pish with Captain Blade.

He's a rascal, isn't he?
 
The Inter player that impressed me most last night was Stefan De Vrij at Number 6.

Our lack of pace was obvious - but we are not likely to come across a team as good as that every week. But let me stress wasn't just the pace of the attackers. What was really impressive was the speed at which they all got back into a well organised defence when losing the ball. We needed someone like Henderson who distributed the ball quickly and accurately from the back.

From the start Egan was talking to the other two and organising. Excellent. Ludlum had a tereffic game.

Play like that and they will win more than they lose.
 
Did Gary Sinclair invite people to get in touch with the club to sign up for a session with Captain Blade?

Could have sworn he said to contact him if you wanted to go out on the pish with Captain Blade.

He's a rascal, isn't he?

Sadly I missed this due to the queues to get in the South Stand turnstiles :rolleyes:
 
We're still missing the odd player with pace and something different IMO, we won't be able to methodically pass our way through every team or rely on a killer ball which seems to be the way we play. Great to watch us try mind you........
 
Sure, drawing conclusions from friendlies can be difficult, but I've had a pop.

Plan is to do more written content this year along with the podcast, so if you're inclined to give my thoughts and opinions some of your time, here's some words on last night (click here if you'd prefer to read it in a slightly-nicer font on Medium :)

Conclusions from our friendly with Inter

Drawing meaningful conclusions from preseason friendlies can be tricky, verging on pointless, but hey, there’s still eleven days until the real stuff starts, so let’s give it a try anyway.

1) On that showing there’s little doubt in my mind that our fitness will be up to speed come the Swansea game. We played with a high press through most of the first half and went flying into pretty much every challenge — if this had been a league match, I think there would have been three or four yellow cards apiece. The intensity of our play and pressure was excellent, and if anything I was hoping we’d ease off a bit earlier than we did…


2) If you’re the kind of person to read something from friendly results (I can’t say I am), then a 1–1 draw with a strong Inter team is encouraging. Sure, they were missing their World Cup players, plus stars like Radja Nainggolan. And sure, they’re a few weeks behind us in terms of preseason preparation (their season kicks off August 19th). But this was still close to their first team, including the brilliant Mauro Icardi who’s scored 100 goals in just 159 Serie A games.

And while there were flashes of brilliance from him, Kwadwo Asamoah and Lautaro Martinez (what a pass to create the equaliser, by the way), United matched Inter well and restricted them to very few chances. Even if Icardi’s backheel for a teammate when in on goal felt rather charitable.


3) With no sign that Coutts will be ready to play any time soon, I’m pretty sure last night’s midfield three of Lundstram, Evans and Fleck will be the one to start against Swansea. I quite like this trio and they were excellent together in the Cardiff home game last season, even if the first two are still far from the finished article. But structurally I can see the logic: Evans plays a deeper, risk-free role, Lundstram can get up and down as the situation requires, and Fleck is released to play further up the pitch.


4) Speaking of Fleck… that performance last night was in keeping with how he played in the second half of last season. That is to say, extremely good. He really has become an all-action midfielder: carrying the ball forward, moving it on, making tackles. Last night he threw in a lovely run and assist for McGoldrick, and fizzed a dipping volley just wide from 25 yards. Some fans will want Duffy to start over Evans or Lundstram but if those two are deployed with the primary goal of freeing up Fleck to play a more attacking role, then that’s fine by me.


5) The early signs are promising for McGoldrick, who by most accounts (this is the first time I’ve seen him play for us) has been good in all three preseason appearances so far. His touch and link-up play were strong, particularly the backheel on the byline that almost created a chance for Clarke. His goal was superbly-taken, as he had to twist his body for Fleck’s pass which was actually played behind him. The finish was very classy.


6) While we absolutely need another striker — hence the pursuit of Martyn Waghorn, even if it looks like we’ll be priced out of it — McGoldrick is smart business. Yes, he has a history of injury problems. Yes, he turns 31 later this year. Yes, he’s only hit double-figures for league goals three times in his career. No, he probably won’t single-handedly fire us to promotion.

But he is a good player — even grumpy Ipswich fans acknowledge that. He cost us nothing. And the deal is structured in a way that incentivises him to do well (1 year, with an option for a second) but is also based around him playing a certain number of games. Basically, this is a low-risk signing with a potentially high upside, filling a squad role vacated by Clayton Donaldson’s departure (and if he avoids injuries, McGoldrick will be much more valuable than Donaldson).


7) I mentioned earlier that I don’t want to read too much into a friendly, and the standard of opposition is higher than we’ll likely face every week, even at 75% pace. But watching United last night did reiterate that we are, as it stands, much the same team as last season… for better or worse.

John Egan should address one of our major areas of need, which was a weakness in the air (look at some of the goals we conceded against Cardiff, Millwall, and Barnsley for example). Dean Henderson was flawless last night and his distribution looks very encouraging, based on 45 minutes. But attacking-wise, we still have the same issues that hurt us last season, through a lack of goals from other areas of the team (apart from Fleck, very few of our non-strikers got into attacking positions), and a general lack of pace or dynamism in all areas.

This is not news, of course — it’s the things we’ve been talking about for roughly six months. But with only two outfield players signed so far — one of which, McGoldrick, is likely a rotation player rather than a guaranteed starter — those problems still exist.

And we still do plenty of things well. Every single player from keeper to Clarke is comfortable on the ball and wants to get on it and play. The wingbacks get forward at every opportunity. Centre-backs look to play into feet rather than hitting long. Last night reminded me just how good we are to watch — but also that we may still struggle to create many chances when the season gets underway.


8) It’s worth pointing out that, as much as I’d like us to sign Waghorn, he wouldn’t necessarily solve our pace/creativity problems either. And there is still a week and a half before the season, and 2 weeks until the transfer deadline. And the loan window stays open until the end of August, and Wilder has already stated that he expects clubs to use this in slightly devious ways — namely loaning a player with the understanding that you’ll buy him in January, to get round the earlier deadline on permanent deals. Hopefully we can use that to our advantage if we haven’t got the players he wants by August 9th.​

Couldn't disagree with you more about the midfield 3 who played last night. Then again I remember you scored Duffy as a 7 for last seasons performance so you clearly don't rate him. One of the reasons why our season tailed off last year was because we played a more defensive 3-5-1-1 in the last few games at Home instead of the more successful 3-4-1-2. Some of this was due to tiredness and the need to rest Duffy our most effective 10 but the 3-5-1-1 system for all its possession didn't realise enough clear opportunities on goal.

Yes the 3 played well against Cardiff at Home but for all our dominant possession we only worked their keeper twice. We drew that game and a few days later playing the same formation against Barnsley CW had to hook Evans after 30 minutes because it wasn't working.

i thought we caused Inter more problems last night when we went with two No.10's in Holmes and Duffy and had Sharp running in front of them. We look better playing with a No.10 at Home. I want us to be on the front foot for the majority of the game and not peter out after 30 minutes.

i suspect you are right that CW will go with the same 3 in midfield against Swansea. If so I anticipate a lot of possession but few openings created.

Agree with you about Egan bringing an aerial presence to the defence and the continued lack of pace in midfield and up front is concerning.
 
Pretty much what I am thinking. The Brookes replacement might offer a bit of the pace up front. Our forward line does worry me a bit. It's too old . Certainly lack pace.fulham and Cardiff had pace and got promoted. I feel we will be around 10th again this season. Not to be sniffed at, but not top six.
 
We're still missing the odd player with pace and something different IMO, we won't be able to methodically pass our way through every team or rely on a killer ball which seems to be the way we play.

If only we had that, if only...
 
...combining this and the unpopular opinions thread:

Yes, we applied ourselves really well, we looked neat and tidy, and organised. But we severely lacked pace and spark up front and that will catch up with us this season, if we don't address it. I expect us to be solid but uninspiring by and large, if I'm honest. If only we had someone who could play between the lines, break with pace, take on their man, offer the unpredictable.

You know, for a low wage, preferably home grown.

If only we had had that. If only.

Absolutely this.

To me there didn't seem to much movement up front to outwit defenders in this division, as we all keep saying we need pace and we all know that doesn't come cheap. The back three needs more work in terms of blending together, they looked a bit adrift at times last night especially Inter's goal nobody saw the danger before it hit the back of the net, but i'm sure that will come, Egan & Joc looked similar players and got in each others way at times, as i say it will come.
Overall a descent performance but i'm not sure where the goals will come from.

UTB
 
Sure, drawing conclusions from friendlies can be difficult, but I've had a pop.

Plan is to do more written content this year along with the podcast, so if you're inclined to give my thoughts and opinions some of your time, here's some words on last night (click here if you'd prefer to read it in a slightly-nicer font on Medium :)

Conclusions from our friendly with Inter

Drawing meaningful conclusions from preseason friendlies can be tricky, verging on pointless, but hey, there’s still eleven days until the real stuff starts, so let’s give it a try anyway.

1) On that showing there’s little doubt in my mind that our fitness will be up to speed come the Swansea game. We played with a high press through most of the first half and went flying into pretty much every challenge — if this had been a league match, I think there would have been three or four yellow cards apiece. The intensity of our play and pressure was excellent, and if anything I was hoping we’d ease off a bit earlier than we did…


2) If you’re the kind of person to read something from friendly results (I can’t say I am), then a 1–1 draw with a strong Inter team is encouraging. Sure, they were missing their World Cup players, plus stars like Radja Nainggolan. And sure, they’re a few weeks behind us in terms of preseason preparation (their season kicks off August 19th). But this was still close to their first team, including the brilliant Mauro Icardi who’s scored 100 goals in just 159 Serie A games.

And while there were flashes of brilliance from him, Kwadwo Asamoah and Lautaro Martinez (what a pass to create the equaliser, by the way), United matched Inter well and restricted them to very few chances. Even if Icardi’s backheel for a teammate when in on goal felt rather charitable.


3) With no sign that Coutts will be ready to play any time soon, I’m pretty sure last night’s midfield three of Lundstram, Evans and Fleck will be the one to start against Swansea. I quite like this trio and they were excellent together in the Cardiff home game last season, even if the first two are still far from the finished article. But structurally I can see the logic: Evans plays a deeper, risk-free role, Lundstram can get up and down as the situation requires, and Fleck is released to play further up the pitch.


4) Speaking of Fleck… that performance last night was in keeping with how he played in the second half of last season. That is to say, extremely good. He really has become an all-action midfielder: carrying the ball forward, moving it on, making tackles. Last night he threw in a lovely run and assist for McGoldrick, and fizzed a dipping volley just wide from 25 yards. Some fans will want Duffy to start over Evans or Lundstram but if those two are deployed with the primary goal of freeing up Fleck to play a more attacking role, then that’s fine by me.


5) The early signs are promising for McGoldrick, who by most accounts (this is the first time I’ve seen him play for us) has been good in all three preseason appearances so far. His touch and link-up play were strong, particularly the backheel on the byline that almost created a chance for Clarke. His goal was superbly-taken, as he had to twist his body for Fleck’s pass which was actually played behind him. The finish was very classy.


6) While we absolutely need another striker — hence the pursuit of Martyn Waghorn, even if it looks like we’ll be priced out of it — McGoldrick is smart business. Yes, he has a history of injury problems. Yes, he turns 31 later this year. Yes, he’s only hit double-figures for league goals three times in his career. No, he probably won’t single-handedly fire us to promotion.

But he is a good player — even grumpy Ipswich fans acknowledge that. He cost us nothing. And the deal is structured in a way that incentivises him to do well (1 year, with an option for a second) but is also based around him playing a certain number of games. Basically, this is a low-risk signing with a potentially high upside, filling a squad role vacated by Clayton Donaldson’s departure (and if he avoids injuries, McGoldrick will be much more valuable than Donaldson).


7) I mentioned earlier that I don’t want to read too much into a friendly, and the standard of opposition is higher than we’ll likely face every week, even at 75% pace. But watching United last night did reiterate that we are, as it stands, much the same team as last season… for better or worse.

John Egan should address one of our major areas of need, which was a weakness in the air (look at some of the goals we conceded against Cardiff, Millwall, and Barnsley for example). Dean Henderson was flawless last night and his distribution looks very encouraging, based on 45 minutes. But attacking-wise, we still have the same issues that hurt us last season, through a lack of goals from other areas of the team (apart from Fleck, very few of our non-strikers got into attacking positions), and a general lack of pace or dynamism in all areas.

This is not news, of course — it’s the things we’ve been talking about for roughly six months. But with only two outfield players signed so far — one of which, McGoldrick, is likely a rotation player rather than a guaranteed starter — those problems still exist.

And we still do plenty of things well. Every single player from keeper to Clarke is comfortable on the ball and wants to get on it and play. The wingbacks get forward at every opportunity. Centre-backs look to play into feet rather than hitting long. Last night reminded me just how good we are to watch — but also that we may still struggle to create many chances when the season gets underway.


8) It’s worth pointing out that, as much as I’d like us to sign Waghorn, he wouldn’t necessarily solve our pace/creativity problems either. And there is still a week and a half before the season, and 2 weeks until the transfer deadline. And the loan window stays open until the end of August, and Wilder has already stated that he expects clubs to use this in slightly devious ways — namely loaning a player with the understanding that you’ll buy him in January, to get round the earlier deadline on permanent deals. Hopefully we can use that to our advantage if we haven’t got the players he wants by August 9th.​
9) There is entirely to much weed smoked at the Lane!, we don't all want to smell the shit, and I don't want my kids smelling it eather.
Would you kindly fuck off somewhere out of the way with it, and stop subjecting everybody to breathing the crap in.
 
Couldn't disagree with you more about the midfield 3 who played last night. Then again I remember you scored Duffy as a 7 for last seasons performance so you clearly don't rate him. One of the reasons why our season tailed off last year was because we played a more defensive 3-5-1-1 in the last few games at Home instead of the more successful 3-4-1-2. Some of this was due to tiredness and the need to rest Duffy our most effective 10 but the 3-5-1-1 system for all its possession didn't realise enough clear opportunities on goal.

I think Duffy's fantastic but he can only go about 60 minutes before he fades away completely (that was my logic for the 7/10, well remembered btw :)). He's another year older now so that level of effectiveness might even come down more.

I see the logic in trying to structure the midfield around whatever gets the best out of Fleck as an attacking force, and I don't see a much better option with the current squad, without asking Fleck to play a deeper role. Think only going with Evans or Lundstram would leave us very open.
 



The main thing for me is how we desperately need to replace Brooks, and still lack pace and creativity.

Funnily enough, you could argue that if we had Brooks now, we wouldn't need any more signings. And we would've only spent the Egan fee. But apparently it was absolutely necessary to sell Brooks....
 
Brooks was well short of consistantly providing pace and creativity. As I ve pointed out before we only won 13 games with Brooks in the team and lost 13 games with him playing. We need better returns .so experience is our greater need. Preston winning 1-0 here showed theyd learnt in their time here to game manage with what they have. This is the thing we have to up our game in. We lost too many to wonder goals or late late goals through our naivety. But this can be tightened up with players with nous
 
The main thing for me is how we desperately need to replace Brooks, and still lack pace and creativity.

Funnily enough, you could argue that if we had Brooks now, we wouldn't need any more signings. And we would've only spent the Egan fee. But apparently it was absolutely necessary to sell Brooks....
By that same logic, would it not make sense to go in firmly for Woodburn?

If Liverpool see he has a chance up front and in Duffy’s role then it might swing it, especially if Holmes has shown something.

There must be a point where we go down the lost and eventually just say no, these are not better than what we have.
 
9) There is entirely to much weed smoked at the Lane!, we don't all want to smell the shit, and I don't want my kids smelling it eather.
Would you kindly fuck off somewhere out of the way with it, and stop subjecting everybody to breathing the crap in.

Much preferable to the smell of beer, and less likely to turn people into nobheads too.
 
I think Duffy's fantastic but he can only go about 60 minutes before he fades away completely (that was my logic for the 7/10, well remembered btw :)). He's another year older now so that level of effectiveness might even come down more.

I see the logic in trying to structure the midfield around whatever gets the best out of Fleck as an attacking force, and I don't see a much better option with the current squad, without asking Fleck to play a deeper role. Think only going with Evans or Lundstram would leave us very open.

Ricky Holmes put in an excellent show for the brief period he was on, He looked creative, determined and dangerous.
 
Maybe i’m just a miserable cunt or maybe it was being tired after a 14 hour day or both. But after the first 30 minutes I wasn’t overly impressed against an Inter side that was walking about. Like others have said we lack up front. McGoldrick did look an improvement on Leon, but dynamic going forward it certainly wasn’t. Duffy may as well have substituted himself. Holmes looked very good but by that point in the game no one had a clue what the other was doing.
 
We dont need a DB. What we need is a player that can break with pace. He doesn't have to be inconsistent and made of glass. Don't get me wrong, I loved DB but the money was too good to turn down so get over it as it was done for the good of the team.

There must be dozens of prem players for loan that have the following criteria:

Young
Strong
Fast
Fearless
Can go past players
Can bring others into the game
Chip in with a couple of goals

The fringe ranks of the prem elite must be brimming with such talent available to loan.

Gerra couple in !
 
Ricky Holmes put in an excellent show for the brief period he was on, He looked creative, determined and dangerous.
Holmes is not the answer. Which you will find out as the season progresses .
 



Hard to draw conclusions when they never got oit of second gear.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom