Cyprus Blade
Active Member
To me there are two main arguments against changing manager :
1) There has to be someone better who is available, affordable and wants to come here.
2) With every change of management there is always an inevitable disruption to the playing staff, backroom staff, playing style etc which usually requires a fair amount of resources and time to settle down. Every manager needs time.
NC has strengths and weaknesses. Looking around I don't see many better alternatives. Does that mean nothing should change? In my view we should looking for ways for improvement across the club including in Nigel. The problem would come in managing the "control freak" in Nigel - in areas like scouting, transfers, tactics and man management. The question is does he recognise that he has weaknesses he needs to address and does he want to. Who knows?
1) There has to be someone better who is available, affordable and wants to come here.
2) With every change of management there is always an inevitable disruption to the playing staff, backroom staff, playing style etc which usually requires a fair amount of resources and time to settle down. Every manager needs time.
NC has strengths and weaknesses. Looking around I don't see many better alternatives. Does that mean nothing should change? In my view we should looking for ways for improvement across the club including in Nigel. The problem would come in managing the "control freak" in Nigel - in areas like scouting, transfers, tactics and man management. The question is does he recognise that he has weaknesses he needs to address and does he want to. Who knows?