Championship League Table by Twitter followers

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

1973Blade

1973Blade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
7,417
Reaction score
18,255
Some surprises. Having been in the Premier League is clearly an advantage. It is an indication of the global reach of a club.
1. West Brom 1.1 million followers
2 = Stoke City 1 million
2= Swansea City 1 million
4. Fulham 600.5K
5. Bournemouth 356.5K
6. Hull City 458.6K
7. QPR 457.3K
8. Sheffield United 434K
9. Nottingham Forest 374.3K
10 Cardiff City 356.8
11 Birmingham City 356.5K
12. Reading 346.8K
13 Derby County 340.9K
14 Middlesbrough 333.7K
15 Blackburn Rovers 255K
16 Huddersfield Town 218.2K
17 Bristol City 189.8K
18 Barnsley 156.1K
19 Blackpool 143.5
20 Millwall 136K
21 Coventry City 132.7
22 Preston North End 111.7K
23 Luton Town 98.3K
24 Peterborough United 91.6K
 


Thiers lies, dam lies and then theirs statistics.

Stoke have about 3 actual followers, the rest are following Slash or Robbie Williams and have clicked the wrong thing.

The population of Hull are just mashing thier hooves on the keyboard so anything can happen.
 
1973Blade said:
Some surprises. Having been in the Premier League is clearly an advantage. It is an indication of the global reach of a club.
1. West Brom 1.1 million followers
2 = Stoke City 1 million
2= Swansea City 1 million
4. Fulham 600.5K
5. Bournemouth 356.5K
6. Hull City 458.6K
7. QPR 457.3K
8. Sheffield United 434K
9. Nottingham Forest 374.3K
10 Cardiff City 356.8
11 Birmingham City 356.5K
12. Reading 346.8K
13 Derby County 340.9K
14 Middlesbrough 333.7K
15 Blackburn Rovers 255K
16 Huddersfield Town 218.2K
17 Bristol City 189.8K
18 Barnsley 156.1K
19 Blackpool 143.5
20 Millwall 136K
21 Coventry City 132.7
22 Preston North End 111.7K
23 Luton Town 98.3K
24 Peterborough United 91.6K
Click to expand...
Not a great lover of the Scabs. But it looks like being Champions of Europe twice means fuck all on Twitter eh?
 
Our twitter count was way behind our porcine neighbours when we embarked upon our 1st Prem season and it didn't take long to overhaul them and create the difference that is shown now.

Just a small reminder to those who advocate "playing in the Championship because it's better/closer games" and of course that might make some feel better - but the Premier League is the only league in town if we actually want to grow the club.

Mediocrity or grow the club?

There's only one answer for me - i've seen too much shit since the 60's.

UTB
 
Our twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube followers easily went up over 100k since the appointment of CW.
 
Fulwood Blade said:
Our twitter count was way behind our porcine neighbours when we embarked upon our 1st Prem season and it didn't take long to overhaul them and create the difference that is shown now.

Just a small reminder to those who advocate "playing in the Championship because it's better/closer games" and of course that might make some feel better - but the Premier League is the only league in town if we actually want to grow the club.

Mediocrity or grow the club?

There's only one answer for me - i've seen too much shit since the 60's.

UTB
Click to expand...
Build it and they will come!
 
1973Blade said:
Some surprises. Having been in the Premier League is clearly an advantage. It is an indication of the global reach of a club.
1. West Brom 1.1 million followers
2 = Stoke City 1 million
2= Swansea City 1 million
4. Fulham 600.5K
5. Bournemouth 356.5K
6. Hull City 458.6K
7. QPR 457.3K
8. Sheffield United 434K
9. Nottingham Forest 374.3K
10 Cardiff City 356.8
11 Birmingham City 356.5K
12. Reading 346.8K
13 Derby County 340.9K
14 Middlesbrough 333.7K
15 Blackburn Rovers 255K
16 Huddersfield Town 218.2K
17 Bristol City 189.8K
18 Barnsley 156.1K
19 Blackpool 143.5
20 Millwall 136K
21 Coventry City 132.7
22 Preston North End 111.7K
23 Luton Town 98.3K
24 Peterborough United 91.6K
Click to expand...
Seasons in PL since 2006/07 (start of twitter)

1. WBA - 10
2 = Stoke - 10
2 = Swansea - 7
4. Fulham - 10
5. Bournemouth - 5
6. Hull - 5
7. QPR - 3
8. Blades - 3
9. Forest - 0
10. Cardiff - 2
11. Brum - 3
12. Reading - 3
13. Derby - 1
14. Boro - 4
15. Blackburn Rovers - 6
16. Huddersfield - 2
17. Bristol City - 0
18. Barnsley - 0
19. Blackpool - 1
20. Milwall - 0
21. Cov - 0
22. PNE - 0
23. Luton - 0
24. Peterboro - 0

Swansea overperforming (Michu-mania at the height of Twitter?).
Blackburn and Boro severely under-performing.
 
Love that Social media was invented after the relegation of the Tramps. that's how long they've been wallowing.
 
mancunianblade said:
Love that Social media was invented after the relegation of the Tramps. that's how long they've been wallowing.
Click to expand...
The last time the Pigs got relegated from the Premiership was the same year Bluetooth, The USB Flash Drive and the 1st Camera Phone was invented
 
Fulwood Blade said:
Our twitter count was way behind our porcine neighbours when we embarked upon our 1st Prem season and it didn't take long to overhaul them and create the difference that is shown now.

Just a small reminder to those who advocate "playing in the Championship because it's better/closer games" and of course that might make some feel better - but the Premier League is the only league in town if we actually want to grow the club.

Mediocrity or grow the club?

There's only one answer for me - i've seen too much shit since the 60's.

UTB
Click to expand...

True if the club want's to grow, then top tier football, Cup finals, qualifying Europe, etc has to happen. But there's still no getting away from the fact that the Premier Division encapsulates everything that is wrong with football, for me it is nothing short of corrupt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom