Revolution
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 13,752
- Reaction score
- 23,648
It's not that outrageous though really. It could take another two years of 'development' before Lou is ready to be a first team regular. During that time he has to be allowed to play, and make mistakes, some of which may be punished. It may even cost us games.
If a bid was big enough, you could argue that we'd be better taking the money and reinvesting it in players who are ready for the first team.
I'd like to think we don't need to do that and NA will be backed enough to get us up and if we're playing well, it should be easier to give the young players opportunities to play and develop, at their own pace.
While his form tailed off last season, it's hardly surprising and he's got better reasons for it than the senior players. Anyone who is overly critical of him, is basically an over- opinionated arsehole whose arrogance is only surpassed by their ignorance.
Well, there is another course. Steven Quinn and Matt Lowton both benefitted from loan spells at other clubs. That's something we could try with Reed if we have better central midfield options.
Then he is allowed to play without any risk of costing us games. There is no reason to stick him in the first team every week for the sake of it if he's not ready. Time is on his side.
I don't think it's over criticising to say he had a poor second half of the season though. It's a factual statement IMHO, despite it perhaps being understandable for a young pro in his first full season.