Burnley (A) - How good could Berge be...?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Rodley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
29,616
Reaction score
58,451
Location
North-West Leodis
...because in spells already he looks like an absolute star. Power, good touch and quality on the deck. Seeing him maraud forward I can’t see many teams containing him if he continues to improve. What a prospect he is!

Throw in the wingbacks looking decent (think Lowe and Bogle will offer some quality in the final third we’ve lacked in spells) and the likes of Osborn et al getting a good game in, I’m not too despondent about that.

UTB
 



Happy with the performances from all the new lads actually. Apart from The GK, who really doesnt fill me with anything close to confidence.

Berge is proper quality. We need to utilise him.
 
Love him more everytime I see him. He oozes calmness and the way he glides past players shouldn't be so easy someone of his height but he does it more often than not.

The upside of him is pretty unreal. Good lad as well. We’ve got another player, like Didzy, who it will be a real pleasure to watch when he’s on song.
 
I was very impressed with him tonight, he oozed composure tonight, in the second half he played one lovely cushioned pass out to the left where it was picked up by Robinson. I was also pleased with the way he got on the ball and drove forward.

He came in for some criticism in the early part of his career at the Lane as he didn't hit the ground running, but i think that poor early form was down to adapting to our style of football, he looks a lot better for learning the system
 
Think we looked a lot more balanced with Norwood RCM. Can't wait for Fleck to fill back in at LCM.

Didzy/Burke partnership > Sharp/McBurnie partnership too.

Didzy HAS to start when fit. Look so much better with him in the team
 
Think we looked a lot more balanced with Norwood RCM. Can't wait for Fleck to fill back in at LCM.

Didzy/Burke partnership > Sharp/McBurnie partnership too.

Didzy HAS to start when fit. Look so much better with him in the team

Question is, if Berge plays centre then do we go with Norwood or Lunny? I'd rather Lunny myself, but that's not because I don't like Norwood, I think he was excellant last season, but not so sure he had the mobility to play RCM like Lunny does. Maybe, for now, Norwood will play centre anyway.
 
Think we looked a lot more balanced with Norwood RCM. Can't wait for Fleck to fill back in at LCM.

Didzy/Burke partnership > Sharp/McBurnie partnership too.

Didzy HAS to start when fit. Look so much better with him in the team

How does that work? Genuine question - I didn't get to watch the game. Last season our game was all about Norwood as the lynchpin sitting back and spraying passes about, with Fleck and Lunny both bursting into the box where possible. I can't see how Fleck on the left and Norwood on the right would be balanced. Did Osborn play a more defensive holding role today, or did Norwood actually get forward?
 
How does that work? Genuine question - I didn't get to watch the game. Last season our game was all about Norwood as the lynchpin sitting back and spraying passes about, with Fleck and Lunny both bursting into the box where possible. I can't see how Fleck on the left and Norwood on the right would be balanced. Did Osborn play a more defensive holding role today, or did Norwood actually get forward?

Norwood played right. Berge central. Looked a lot more balanced than the other way around to me.
 



Not for me MattB
Berge has to start in the centre
Right midfield could be one of three
JL, ON or Ampadu (sp)
 
Norwood played right. Berge central. Looked a lot more balanced than the other way around to me.

I think we wanted to see if Norwood could deliver more telling passes and crosses when he was a bit more advanced. Maybe it's something we can try if we're chasing a game and dominating possession high up the pitch. Long term I don't think it's a good solution. Norwood lacks the pace and engine to bomb forward and be a goal threat. Defensively he's not great at pressing/closing players down, which is also required from that role.

If Berge plays centrally Lundstram is probably still the best RCM, but we could really do with someone who's as fit, but who can also beat a man and offer a bit more flair and creativity.
 
What was so good to see tonight was that actually we now have a much stronger squad. Burke, Ampadu, Bogle and Lowe all showed up and played well, we just have this calibre of player challenging the first team last year.
 
Remember when everyone thought we had brought a dud 🙄 ( waits for the replies of "not me" )

Sander Berge – 9
A superb display from Berge and everything most Blades fans want to see from their record signing. Strong, accomplished in possession, and drove forward when he could. A fine display.
 
MattB
Ignore me please
I misread your post
Tonight's excuse is Jaipur
 
I thought he looked a lot stronger from the bits I saw. Very pleased with him.
 
Looks quality and only seems to be getting better. Preferred him in the middle too.
 
He's the player we build a team around, hopefully we can get that creativity/cutting edge to compliment him. Would hate to lose him by not matching his ambitions.
 
Didzy HAS to start when fit. Look so much better with him in the team
If we're playing a flat(ish) three we have to have a link man. McGoldrick is probably the only forward we have capable of fulfilling that role at the moment.
 
It's not hard, but better than Mcfluffedit.
 
Long term, if Berge maintains his momentum we'll have a genuine class act on our hands, someone who'll attract some of the biggest clubs around.

We'll either have to extend his contract, something I think we'll struggle to do given the input of his agent plus whatever the player's ambitions happen to be, or look to sell and capitalise on said quality. I hope I'm wrong, but it seems clear as day that our primary ambition is to remain in this division whilst attempting to improve our status. To do that will require more quality players, and as we've seen, whoever we pursue will alert other clubs who will, presumably, offer wages we cannot compete with.

I'm not down about this, but I do feel a realistic view of our commodities and how they can help this club's future is in order.

Wages are one of the biggest considerations we have to think about, assuming that we have ambitions beyond remaining one of the club's regularly fighting relegation. Entering the land of milk and honey never promised an end to struggling, at least not as we've known it, all it meant was that it would test us in ways that some may not have appreciated. It's been well documented what priorities the club has to consider; squad strengthening, improved training facilities, ground infrastructure, and last but certainly not least, wages. These will provide the board with ample opportunity to prove just how capable they are.

It's a fascinating time to follow this club, and the next five years should provide us with the opportunity to see (a) whether we'll still remain a Prem club and (b) whether we can rise to these challenges with the necessary creativity, robust attitudes, and whatever else enables us to get across the line. Having been outside of the Prem for far too long, I hope we manage to achieve these ambitions with a bit to spare.......wouldn't that be special?
 
He’s a future asset of £60/70m. It unfortunately looks like curtains for Norwood as a first team regular, like a fish outta water at right of a 3.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom