BradleyfuckinDack!!?!!

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

You stop Dack you stop Blackburn. Which we did.

You’re taking away from our defensive performance by saying Dack isn’t all that - he is - we just defended brilliantly all night and he couldn’t find a way through.

Plenty of Championship sides have found out how good Dack is this season and plenty more will, but not us.
 



I recall Waghorn moving for a small fortune, that's turned out well, hasn't it?

It's a gamble, each and every one of these 'rated' players is a gamble that needs the most astute consideration a side can bring. We missed a bullet with Waggers, not quite the top draw finisher or leader of the line that we need. He may yet deliver, but one decent season and wham, his valuation shot up, fed by the greedy hysteria that accompanies any transfer window. It seems we have a management team who bring a level of consideration to every player we're interested in, and for that we must be thankful. Yes, Wilder has sometimes got it wrong, but this is rare, and considering that this campaign has seen Henderson, Egan, Norwood, and McGoldrick join us, to my mind that's impressive by anyone's standards.
 
I keep getting reminded by my piggy mate that I said banana was crap last season... what I actually said was that he got owned by Coutts, Fleck and Duffy when we tore them apart. But I’d also see him have bad games when I’d watch the pigs on sky as well...

Now for every game he plays well my mate reminds me that i said he was a shite player. Personally I think that If he’s not doing it consistently agains better sides and in big games then it tells it’s own story of how good he actually is

Same for Dack. If he can’t do it against better sides then you have to ask where his limitations are. One game won’t tell you that, but you can’t tell a lot from one game. He was very quiet last night, but he was up against a midfield which is as good as if not the best in the division.

Ps I spelt Bannan correctly, but it was autocorrected to Banana and thought it sounded better
like for the banana reference
it’s a keeper that Swiss :D i’ll have that
 
Can
As one or two in this thread have mentioned, I judged Dackers on this solitary game. Thing is, it's what we do, isn't it? A game happens, we observe a particular player, and whatever assessment we make is based on the level of performance that's delivered. We marginalised Dack. I've seen him before and there have been moments when I thought he might be capable of playing at a higher level. He's fat in the same way Sharp is, so let's dismiss this distraction. I expect a rated player to impress me, sadly he didn't step up. Probably because we didn't allow him to, but these are the problems that a talented player has to face throughout their career.

Last night we delivered a first rate game. We matched and bettered them at every turn. Our game management (a term that's now standard) was excellent, and the overall level of performance from every player was what a promotion team should be expected to deliver. The cherry on this cake was the return of the mighty Coutts. It looks like he's back in his groove, and no doubt the physios and doctors will assess his reactions after each game, but what we saw last night warmed the cockle of this man's heart. What Coutts brings to our game is probably more substantial than many of us think, so well done that man, your presence is going to help the team, and that includes the upcoming derby, now that's a thought!


You're only supposed to slag our own players.
 
Mate last night kept calling him 'Bradley Dackburn Rovers' :D

Did they turn down ridiculous money for him in the summer or is that my imagination?

Apparently (and I’ll use the term loosely) £15m was offered.

You out tomorrow?
 
It's a very simple game and Dack might be a really good player, but in simple terms if you haven't got the ball, then you can't play.

That's probably a bit of a sweeping generalisation and some of you will no doubt point out that Blackburn actually had the ball quite a bit, particularly for the first 20 minutes of the second half. However, it's also a team game and nearly all players need their team-mates to play well for them to do so. I remember going to QPR last season when we didn't play very well and some people were having a go at Coutts (before his injury made him a martyr) for 'being quiet'. I suggested at the time that I thought he was a player that thrived on the rest of the team playing well and would complement that. It's more than likely the same with Dack.

Of course we shouldn't belittle our own achievements and I'm certain that Blackburn's poor team performance was mainly due to how we played. We were just better than them in every department.

Pretty much agree. I thought Blackburn looked alright when they had the ball, they just didn't have enough of it, and Basham had a storming game at the back.

I didn't see Dack making many errors or playing particularly poorly. We controlled the majority of the game and defended well.
 
Remember him playing for Gillingham at the Lane in our promotion season. Dack started really well and looked a really good player and scored with a great free kick. However he faded after that and looked overweight and unfit. Sounds like Mowbray may have "done a Wilder" on him and got him playing to his full potential. Not seen him play this season so can't really comment on the present but obviously didn't do anything on Wednesday.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom