Paulus
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,638
- Reaction score
- 2,313
When a player puts on a Blades' shirt I put on the rose tinted specs and seek out the strengths as far as I can and do my best to ignore the weaknesses but I'm really struggling to apply this in Henderson's case.
Part of the problem goes back to his Watford days, where he became one of my pet hate figures, I thought he was a lumbering, dirty donkey and it underlined my sense of superiority as a Blade that we didn't have such a crap forward as him, we had heroes like Shipps and Hulse.
The fact that we have effectively replaced decent players with him has not added to my opinion of him, if we had picked him up on a free as a squad player I would probably have thought fair enough but spending £2M on him...
All of this though is less important than the effect it seems to have on the team when we play him. I know I'm probably being irrational but I am associating the crap hoofball as much with Henderson as I have with Blackwell. I know the guy has scored a few goals for us this season and he works hard but it just doesn't work for me and even with the rose tinted shades it still strikes me that he is constantly fouling the opposition.
If we are going to play with a more creative midfield with Williamson, Yeates and Ward (please god that we do) then wouldn't we be better off with a more mobile forward, either Evans or indeed Billy playing off Camara, rather than Henderson? If we need a bigger bloke Cresswell seems to have more of a football brain than Henderson, a better touch and offers more movement.
Am I missing something in his game? Is anyone seeing anything else he contributes to us? Was it any surprise that we played better at Forest after he went off even though it left us a man short?
Part of the problem goes back to his Watford days, where he became one of my pet hate figures, I thought he was a lumbering, dirty donkey and it underlined my sense of superiority as a Blade that we didn't have such a crap forward as him, we had heroes like Shipps and Hulse.
The fact that we have effectively replaced decent players with him has not added to my opinion of him, if we had picked him up on a free as a squad player I would probably have thought fair enough but spending £2M on him...
All of this though is less important than the effect it seems to have on the team when we play him. I know I'm probably being irrational but I am associating the crap hoofball as much with Henderson as I have with Blackwell. I know the guy has scored a few goals for us this season and he works hard but it just doesn't work for me and even with the rose tinted shades it still strikes me that he is constantly fouling the opposition.
If we are going to play with a more creative midfield with Williamson, Yeates and Ward (please god that we do) then wouldn't we be better off with a more mobile forward, either Evans or indeed Billy playing off Camara, rather than Henderson? If we need a bigger bloke Cresswell seems to have more of a football brain than Henderson, a better touch and offers more movement.
Am I missing something in his game? Is anyone seeing anything else he contributes to us? Was it any surprise that we played better at Forest after he went off even though it left us a man short?