Another point that hasnt been considered

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Digs blade

Active Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
2,286
Reaction score
4,148
My final point on the disallowed goal debacle that I don’t think anyone has mentioned.

Why wasn’t a penalty given for handball against the villa defender who pushed the goalie into the net.

Not even worthy of a VAR review apparently.

Makes the injustice even worse and why I think VAR still has some explanation to give on this matter
 



My final point on the disallowed goal debacle that I don’t think anyone has mentioned.

Why wasn’t a penalty given for handball against the villa defender who pushed the goalie into the net.

Not even worthy of a VAR review apparently.

Makes the injustice even worse and why I think VAR still has some explanation to give on this matter
Let it lie. We'll cross that bridge at the end of the season. We'll still lose out on Europe if 2 points are crucial to a place. We may be bunged financially to compensate.😎
 
Like I said it’s my final point but mistified as to why it wasnt reviewed for handball. If I’m clutching at straws then any reason as to why?
 
Isnt the guidance its not looked at if its a defender but is looked at if it is an attacker and resulted in a goal ? This is what everyone was complaining about at the beginning the inconsistancy of it all.
 
Don’t think anyone knows anymore mate. Anyway onwards and upwards
 
Let it lie. We'll cross that bridge at the end of the season. We'll still lose out on Europe if 2 points are crucial to a place. We may be bunged financially to compensate.😎

Those 2 points are only 'crucial' if 3 points are taken in each of the remaining 9 games.
 
Depends what’s on the Video refs betting slip.....
 
Like I said it’s my final point but mistified as to why it wasnt reviewed for handball. If I’m clutching at straws then any reason as to why?
you evidently don't know the rules:-

Article 666 rule 33. A penalty shall not be awarded or reviewed in the event that the awarding of said penalty should harm the chances of any team containing the words 'West', and 'Ham'.
 
you evidently don't know the rules:-

Article 666 rule 33. A penalty shall not be awarded or reviewed in the event that the awarding of said penalty should harm the chances of any team containing the words 'West', and 'Ham'.

You've not thought this through, a blades win would have benefited West Ham.
 
Another point to consider is could it make a difference to how much money we get at the end of the season.

But then who cares.......:tumbleweed:
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom