United 0 Barnsley 0 - report

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,556
Reaction score
38,793
Sheffield United’s late season surge and outside chances of a playoff place probably ended at the hands of South Yorkshire rivals Barnsley. A 0-0 stalemate meant the Tykes moved into the 6th spot and the playoffs whilst the Blades now are set to face a sixth consecutive season in League One. In a game of few chances a draw was probably a fair result with the home side in truth not doing enough to win a game they simply had to win.


Manager Nigel Adkins named an unchanged side yet again as the Blades sought the all important win to get amongst the promotion play off places. After a starting so many games so well, United were defending early on as Hamill had a shot at Long and then Isgrove drew a mistake on McEveley. United had been slow to start but Flynn was busy and then Done’s cross evaded everyone as they sought to get a foothold in the game. Barnsley had been quicker to the ball and had looked lively inside the first quarter of an hour.


The first real chance of the game saw some nice play from Barnsley but Hamill’s shot was parried by Long after good work by Fletcher. United then broke and after the referee played on, Davies dropped a cross under pressure from Sharp but Done’s effort was cleared off the line as it lacked the necessary power to score.


Not long after Flynn made an opening and from his cross, Adams hit a low shot that seemed goal bound before Davies managed to get a great full length save tipping the ball onto the post. After this chance United slowly started to take control. They won two corners and then Basham had a shot deflected over. However, despite the improvements from the home side, Barnsley felt hard done by when Flynn dithered to clear but as Fletcher stole it and then scored, the referee deemed he had been fouled in the build-up. Winnall was booked for an overly aggressive foul on Long as the keeper held before United broke but Adams was crowded out. The half time whistle came soon after.


Barnsley began after the break with some purpose and Fletcher sent an effort wide. Hammond was finally booked after he had committed a series of fouls and then Done was also cautioned for a late foul after some uncertainty in the United back line.


United were struggling to create much but a good move with Adams and Done involved saw the latter saw cross go right across goal somehow evading Sharp. At the other end Hamill fired over before Cuvellier and Woolford replaced Hammond and Done. Woolford had a cross that went across the box again with Sharp again just missing out before Fletcher missed a good chance nodding wide after Baptise had lost the ball.


In truth both teams had huffed and puffed but there has been little quality. Sammon came on for McEveley and at this stage it became reminiscent of a basketball game as both teams were attacking in an attempt to get the winner. Baptiste broke out and Sammon seemed in the clear but it was blocked out. The game entered four minutes of stoppage time and in this Sharp had a header saved and then an overhead kick over the bar. The final whistle came immediately after this. The game finished with Barnsley the happier of the two sides with neither side having done enough to win the game.


United – After some recent improvements in games, I felt we never really got going. We have been starting games really well but today we were slow and lost a lot of 50/50 battles. We never really set the initiative. We did gradually get back into the game and had a better spell from 20 minute to 40 minute mark but overall we created few chance save for the Done scrambled one off the line after keeper dropped and the Adams shot that hit the post. It was fairy even but I thought second half we would have a real go but it never happened. It was even again most of this half. We had a go at the death and a few half chances but in truth I cannot remember us having a decent effort second half and overall we did not do enough to win the game. Barnsley were no great shakes but today the passing was slow and took an age for us to execute simple things. We looked more like the side earlier in the season as we were very slow and methodical in the build-up. The tempo was slow and predictable. We just did not move it quick enough and as a result we struggled to create much. I felt they nullified our formation far better than most of the teams have recently and we struggled to create much at all.


We became very predictable and with Adams and Sharp not really linking or holding the ball up, we struggled to find an opening. The diagonal ball to Basham became our main threat as we looked to take advantage of his height advantage down this side. We did not have some of the crisp and quick passing we have and generally the touch and assuredness of our players was a long way off from what it has been in recent improved performances. Barnsley had more zest and were pressing more than many of our recent opponents. They were not great but just pressed more and looked more determined and committed than we have faced. United for me just had too many off their game and I felt for a must win game, we looked slow and laborious for too many spells. We did not do enough and as I say did not move it on quick enough or wide or even up top with any tempo. It was so laborious and as a result Barnsley got men behind the ball. Sadly, it was more reminiscent of most of the early-mid season performance’s. Today when it mattered too many did not turn up and sadly we had a second consecutive home blank. We did not have any real idea how to break Barnsley down and we were quite clueless. They did not create anything either but with a four-point cushion had less emphasis to score. We simply had to win and score but did not force the issue. Sadly, with so many slow and immobile players it makes it hard to turn teams. At times it took us 15-20 touches via 4 or 5 men to play a ball to a certain wing when it could have happened in a few seconds and a few touches. By this time the defence had got back into position. We then would do the same again to switch it to the other side. It did not help the two strikers who have played well had really poor games but even with this we never looked like creating anything from midfield and looked clueless for long spells.


A few many have thought we should maybe keep maybe showed why we should not with some very indifferent performances from quite a few when it mattered. This game more than games v Crewe/Port Vale should be a measure of why most should be released at the end of the season.


So for us our season is now all but over. We have simply not been good enough all year and despite recent improvements it has come too little, too late. It was not about today but performances over the course of the season which in truth have not been good enough. For us to be staring at 8th/9th with our wage bill and resources as Wigan canter to the League is hugely disappointing. I still feel Adkins is not safe and I am sure meetings at the end of the season will decide his fate. If he is sacked, he cannot argue really. He has overseen a poor season where we have been way off the top two places. He has not really improved things in any way. He will be nervous and know he has underachieved as he awaits his fate. With two games to play now and very little to play for but pride, United now have to think about next season. Today though was very much a microcosm of much of the season with slow play, little urgency and overall a performance that was not good enough to get what we wanted.


Barnsley – They have done great to go from bottom to 6th from when they played us before Christmas. They have gone forwards whilst we have gone sideways at best. They were full of running all game and were very determined and sadly looked fitter than us as the game went on. They were not a great side and created little but they defended well limiting us to very few chances (Adams chance and maybe a Sharp header only real chances) and will say it was a well-deserved away point.

The two lads at the back played well helped by Sharp and Adams awful touch/decisions. In midfield they were busy and pressed all game but they did not create too much with a few half chances and that was it. Although they may feel they had the best chance with the Fletcher header and also had a goal disallowed which some referees may have let it go.


I am not sure they will go up but they have a great chance now of the playoffs so who knows. A club and side that had a far less budget than us but ultimately will finish higher than us in the league now.


Opponent man of the match : Mawson. Could have been him or Roberts who defended well. Not Sharp and Adams day but these two defended well winning headers, making blocks and limiting us.


Opponent Weak link : Williams. The lad who played right back struggled with Basham until he was moved inside for the final part of the game.


SUFC Player Ratings –


Long 6/10 – Thought he was a bit shaky at times with one shot bobbling out and a few crosses which he should have took but punched instead, some of them chest height which he should have just grasped. His kicking was mixed with some quick ones out nearly finding Adams and Sharp but some kicks were awful going straight out.


Basham 7/10 – He tried to isolate a smaller full back and I felt he kept running at men and was all action. At times not even sure he knows what he is doing but is strangely effective. One of our better performers and has done well in this unfamiliar position.


Done 5.5/10 – He got up and down and put a few really good crosses in but often gambled also which led to them breaking away and leaving him woefully out of position. His touch was not great today and even despite his effort he has played better than he has today. Not sure he can defend very well and that will be a question moving forward despite his enthusiasm going the other way. Scowen caused his problems with his pace.


Baptiste 6.5/10 – Not as good as he has been but still one of our better players. He came onto the ball and always looked to be positive both defending and attacking. One slip nearly led to Fletcher scoring in the second half but overall read game well and used it well when he could. Had one run at the end when he maybe ought to have kept going when Sammon stepped in.


Edgar 6/10 – Uncertain for long spells mixed in with some steady defending. First half especially he was slow or gave it away quite a bit. He generally was not always assured in clearances or passing. Got better after the break though. Still do not think I would sign him sadly and think we could sign a younger and more mobile or commanding centre back.


McEveley 6/10 – Odd show as first half he started badly with some hesitant play dithering to clear or sending some poor passes to the opposition. He looked very unsteady overall but he got better after the break and used his body and experience to shield it out two or three times. Still today showed to me why we should not entertain bringing back players of his ilk back.


Flynn 6/10 – He got kicked a lot today and that hindered him as he spent a lot of time on the deck or limping back into play! At times he was busy but also sometimes ran into blind alleys and there was little end product. I felt any influence he had lessened as the game went on. A very ordinary performance and another that to me needs to be moved on.


Hammond 4/10 – Awful for most of the game. After recent improvements where he has broken it up and kept it simple and done a steady job, today he did nothing of the sort. Fouled constantly often going to ground before he did upend an opponent. Gave the ball away a lot and also played a lot of short/loose balls too. Always running after players and chasing them as his legs showed he could not keep up with many. Once second half a Barnsley player just jogged past him and that was sign for Adkins to give him the hook. He surely must see his legs have gone? He got booked when he should have been cautioned a long time before. When he went off it was a change that was cheered. That says it all. Would be a nonsensical signing.


Coutts 7/10 – Might have been our best player. Sure he gave it away a few times and he too was slow to do what was needed but showed some lovely touches and control (the ball he took high from the clouds a casing point) and always at least looked to prompt or try and find a shirt. He never looks like really driving forward/scoring (the ridiculous long range shot when the keeper came and kicked summed it up) but at least he was neat and tidy. Sadly, as with most of the team no real penetration.


Adams 5/10 – Not his day. Started game ok with some decent runs and hold ups but then things started to ping off him. He did have our best effort with the low shot saved via the post. Second half felt he made some poor decisions with some silly flicks and he got rid of it too quick. I felt he needed to just get it, turn and run at the defence but almost seemed obsessed with giving and going.


Sharp 4/10 – His worst game this season for me. Nothing he did worked. He lost it when it came to him, did not hold it up and was sloppy in all aspects of play. Had one header he should have done better with and then a wild volley over at the end. Also missed two crosses which came over. Just one of those games really.


Subs


Cuvelier – Came on for the poor Hammond but he was even worse. I actually do not think he did anything right. He was abysmal. Maybe could not adjust to the pace of the game but was hardly breakneck! Weak, poor touch and slow to react. He looks overweight and still unfit (after three years). I thought he looked woeful to be honest and out of his depth (even at League One level). Amazed some fans think he is worth keeping around. Has to be released. Three seasons and barely a decent performance in that time.


Woolford – He tried to get down the wing and actually got one decent cross in which missed everyone.


Sammon – Brought on as many jeered as he entered the field. Even though I am not his biggest fan I had no issues with his entrance today and actually would have introduced him earlier. We had nothing going up top so he was a different look. Sadly had one chance but seemed to take an age and then his shot was blocked away (not sure it was going in anyway).


Manager – Adkins 5/10 – He picked the same team which was to be expected but I felt today he needed to change it earlier as nothing was happening. We started game slow and then after we picked up, we then began second half poorly and in same languid style. I felt either by personnel or formation he needed to try something different but sadly he did not and the game kind of petered out. The Sammon change was too little too late. We started going for it but it was only with a few minutes left we started this cavalier attitude. I wish we had gone for it much earlier.


Ref – Coote. Was fine really. He tried to let it go but brought it back when he could. The goal he disallowed seemed to be a pullback but some neutrals suggest United were a bit fortunate. The Hammond, Hammill, Winnall and Cuvellier bookings were obvious. Hourihane’s foul was awful on Basham but sadly where it was meant it could not be red no matter how cynical it was. I felt he had no help from his assistants who often just guessed.


Crowd – Good crowd of 23,307. Barnsley brought best following of the season to the Lane with maybe 4,-4,500 away fans (?) inside the ground having most of the top tier (not the corner) and even some in the bottom tier. They were vocal throughout against an oddly quite United following who with few chances and the sadly slow tempo of most of the season, struggled to give them such backing. United fans were quite frustrated with the slow and often negative play as the side failed to get it forward quickly or create many chances of note all game.
 



I would give an extra mark to the back 3 who I thought were strong and kept them at bay ,good job because Long had a bad one. In fact I would just give Baptiste MOM just ahead of Coutts. Sharp and Hammond had bad games ,agree about Hammond ,simply not good enough. Would probably mark Adams up 1 but his decision making and vision is poor ,he seems not very bright to me ,might be wrong. Adkins should have made subs earlier and tried to force a game we had to win. Thought Scowen was very good for them ,still has Done in his pocket now. Unlike some I thought it was good fast competitive game with a fair result ,they have improved beyond belief ,still think if Freeman had closed Hourihan down at Oakwel (touché) and they hadn't equalised both sides would have had a very different season ,the seasons defining moment for me. Good report Db A weekend in Coventry now awaits me :eek:
 
Agree with all of that.. as i said in another post i thought we were strangely flat for large parts of the game.. amazing when you consider the potential rewards at stake. Adkins should have put some fresh legs on in midfield much earlier and brought the young lads on. personally i would have stuck Done up front as Billy was having 'one of those games' where nothing was coming off for him. Can't criticise the lad really, without him we'd have been near the relegation zone. Adams needs the ball to feet FACING THE GOAL, not with his back to it. he needs to run at teams, it frightens the life out of them
Our real problem is our midfield. we don't have one. Bash did ok but with Coutts (fancy flicks, great control no end product), Hammond (always seems to pass short, someone will end up in hospital) and Flynn (can't stand up, couldn't tackle a paper bag), Done totally out of position/sorts we are going nowhere as we have no drive in this area.
Massive clearout needed. If Adkins signs Hammond, the fans will turn on him if they haven't already.
 
Harsh on the defence who I thought were good. Same with Sharp who I felt worked hard off the ball. Adams, Flynn and Coutts I thought were guilty of floating around aimlessly when the opposition were in possession.
 
Agree with all of that.. as i said in another post i thought we were strangely flat for large parts of the game.. amazing when you consider the potential rewards at stake. Adkins should have put some fresh legs on in midfield much earlier and brought the young lads on. personally i would have stuck Done up front as Billy was having 'one of those games' where nothing was coming off for him. Can't criticise the lad really, without him we'd have been near the relegation zone. Adams needs the ball to feet FACING THE GOAL, not with his back to it. he needs to run at teams, it frightens the life out of them
Our real problem is our midfield. we don't have one. Bash did ok but with Coutts (fancy flicks, great control no end product), Hammond (always seems to pass short, someone will end up in hospital) and Flynn (can't stand up, couldn't tackle a paper bag), Done totally out of position/sorts we are going nowhere as we have no drive in this area.
Massive clearout needed. If Adkins signs Hammond, the fans will turn on him if they haven't already.

Agree with that. For me, I just don't think Coutts is good enough to be a luxury player and avoid his defensive responsibilities. He's not the answer for me. We need two decent centre midfielders and a winger. Plus a centre half or two (Baptiste please +1).
 
Was very impressed with their big centre-back, Roberts - came from non-league too. And agree about it being between him & Mawson as their best player today. As good a centre-back pairing as we've seen (albeit not that we gave them anything remotely troubling to deal with).
Agree they looked decent today..Billy and Che lacked the pace to get in behind them for me..when they did get turned they handled it,and they had no problem with the ball in the air.
 
Agree with that. For me, I just don't think Coutts is good enough to be a luxury player and avoid his defensive responsibilities. He's not the answer for me. We need two decent centre midfielders and a winger. Plus a centre half or two (Baptiste please +1).
Barnsley set up with a method to stop us getting round the back ,when teams play this way moving the ball quickly is everything we were too sluggish and although I rate coutts as a footballer he has a tendency to be too laid back in his approach which played into Barnsley hands,he wasn't the only one .No doubt there centre backs were there king pln as Sharp was made to look poor on the day and Adams has a lot to learn (he is improving ) and seems a bit slow ( football intellegence ) .I must say that Basham certainly gives it his best shot,if the team played with his attitude we would be at the top and going
up his work ethic is fantastic my man of the match.
 
I agree re Flo, I watched him closely today. I think he's allegedly one of the top earners but whenever I've seen him I really don't see anything to justify it. Ran around a bit but with little impact and when he got the ball he looks to get rid asap rather than make a play for something, which I thought was his usp. He made one good tackle. Nowt else. I'd love to see our wage bill, who is coming off it and who could realistically fill the gaps with the budget left.

As an aside I heard from a Leeds fan that when they signed Murphy from Crewe he was on a grand a week (ish) and they banged him on around £15k. (Which is lunacy considering he'd never played in the champ) If someone is a stand out player in this league (or a shitty Scottish league) we should be able to double whatever Crewe/Bury/Southend *insert the majority of clubs here, and they should come. (Maybe with an incentive with promotion) If not fuck them. I have a feeling we acquiesce to demands of players rather than seeing if they want to come and prove they are worth it.

Sir Bob described his negotiations today, he was made an offer, went outside to discuss it with his dad. Did a little "yes!" In the corridor. Went back in, before he opened his mouth was told that there was no more money. He said "that's fine, where's the pen?" . . . If a player is in our league, he should want to come here. Let's sweep up the best ones (that aren't obviously worth a couple of mill) and go from there.
 
Great report Deadbat - in a nutshell Barnsley worked harder, were better balanced, were faster and fitter and all that helps to achieve results.

Average age of the players on the pitch: Us 27 years. Them 23 years. Barnsley have a "Pathway for Youth".

Coutts did OK with the ball but doesn't even pretend to tackle or track back, can't give a player more than 5 when he only does half a job.

Coutts and Hammond played more at the pace of the Walking Football we saw at half time. Hammond was as bad as ever, only assertive kicks he produces are on players, never passes. They were overwhelmed by Barnsley's energy and couldn't cope; should never play them both in the same midfield.

All Back 3 scored at least one more each for me, in fact Baptiste 8, Edgar 8 McEv 7. Long 1 less and Flynn 1 more. Coutts 5.

Midfield is where we lost it. Barnsley worked harder, had two excellent wide men and played with a togetherness. Our best ploy, which we overplayed, was that big punt from Long to Basham's head; sorry that's 60's football mentality. We also punted far too many high balls up to Sharp and that's just ludicrous, no wonder heir defenders had such a good time. Quick passing moves from us, maybe 2/3 all game.

The manager brought Sammon on with 3 minutes to go, Woolford with 7 minutes to go, Cuvelier with 17 minutes to go. He was a startled rabbit without a clue how to turn the game which we had to win. Sharp and Adams were unable to cope, Coutts, Flynn and Hammond were overwhelmed all game, Done and Basham are not wing backs. From the hour mark we were crying out for changes to personnel and playing pattern but it didn't come, leaving the cavalry charge until 85 minutes is a last ditch gamble which will pay off occasinally. Making calculated substitutions and changing the formation around 60/70 minutes is much wiser.

Barnsley's wide men Hammill and Isgrove were excellent second half in particular. Their two central defenders were outstanding. Adkins will have access to mileage stas and I suggest Barnsley's workrate and effort will be reflected by a margin commensurate with the ages of the players, something like 27:23 ratio i.e. 20% more. I'm not saying United players didn't try, a number sank to their haunches at the final whistle as a result of sheer effort and disappointment, they just haven't got it in their tanks.
 
Last edited:
Just had an e-mail from my Barnsley pal.

He thought a draw was a fair result and thought Adams was our main threat, though "he fouls a lot". He thought our wide men were very disappointing considering the time, focus and service they had and the fact Barnsley had a right back at left back and a midfielder at right back!

He thought Roberts was MOM and they are too reliant on Hammill who is playing with a bad injury and 50% effectiveness. Winnall scores 20 goals a season but no good in general play and a dilemma. Isgrove had his best game but usually produces little where it matters.
 



Good report as usual and agree with most of what has been said. Substitutions left far to late. Not sure why he brought Cuvelier on. Not seen anything that he offers. As poor as he has been this season Reid for Hammond would have been a better bet. Had to take Hammond off as he was as usual just one more tackle away from a second yellow and players were just running past him. Don't know what was wrong with Sharp yesterday but he looked like the player we had under Robson. Was he carrying an injury? Adams did slightly better but his decision making drives you mad at times. Needs to learn to look up before playing the ball. Overall a lot of huff and puff from both teams but no end product.

One piece of quality was always going to settle the game. Unfortunately neither side had it. Good point for Barnsley in the end and puts them in the driving seat for 6th place. This really is a poor league this year.
 
I have to say I have bit my lip on this but when some have come on and said Cuvelier is a talent and we should keep him around. Why?! Interesting that likes of Coutts and Baxter get hammered (me just done it another thread!) but this lad allegedly on a decent wage has barely played in 3 seasons and when he has he has been absolutely awful. I remember seeing him at Carlisle under Weir and he looked terrified of physical contact, could not wait to move it on and offered nothing. 3 years on and he is no better. Yesterday he gave it away 5 or 6 times, fouled his man, lost his runner and looked knackered when he was only on 20 minutes. He was even worse than Hammond. He also looked over weight. Those saying he deserves a new deal?!! Why? have you seen some secret games that SUFC have played with him starring that noone else has. Get rid.

Like all the rest out of contract,save Long. McEveley and Flynn yesterday when we needed big performances showed for the most part why they too should be moved on. They have had a chance to help this club get promoted and failed. Let some others have a go (on less wages probably) that may be hungrier and actually feel lucky to play for such a great club/in a great stadium. They migh equally fail but deserve a chance. These lads have had their turn.
 
Have to agree. It looked soft to me. I think a lot of refs would have played on. Flynn hits the deck so much often with minimal contact.
 
I have to say I have bit my lip on this but when some have come on and said Cuvelier is a talent and we should keep him around. Why?! Interesting that likes of Coutts and Baxter get hammered (me just done it another thread!) but this lad allegedly on a decent wage has barely played in 3 seasons and when he has he has been absolutely awful. I remember seeing him at Carlisle under Weir and he looked terrified of physical contact, could not wait to move it on and offered nothing. 3 years on and he is no better. Yesterday he gave it away 5 or 6 times, fouled his man, lost his runner and looked knackered when he was only on 20 minutes. He was even worse than Hammond. He also looked over weight. Those saying he deserves a new deal?!! Why? have you seen some secret games that SUFC have played with him starring that noone else has. Get rid.

Like all the rest out of contract,save Long. McEveley and Flynn yesterday when we needed big performances showed for the most part why they too should be moved on. They have had a chance to help this club get promoted and failed. Let some others have a go (on less wages probably) that may be hungrier and actually feel lucky to play for such a great club/in a great stadium. They migh equally fail but deserve a chance. These lads have had their turn.

In his early performances Cuvelier showed a bit of pace and guile, but that all seems to have gone, so I agree with you Deaders, time to move him on.
 
Sheffield United’s late season surge and outside chances of a playoff place probably ended at the hands of South Yorkshire rivals Barnsley. A 0-0 stalemate meant the Tykes moved into the 6th spot and the playoffs whilst the Blades now are set to face a sixth consecutive season in League One. In a game of few chances a draw was probably a fair result with the home side in truth not doing enough to win a game they simply had to win.


Manager Nigel Adkins named an unchanged side yet again as the Blades sought the all important win to get amongst the promotion play off places. After a starting so many games so well, United were defending early on as Hamill had a shot at Long and then Isgrove drew a mistake on McEveley. United had been slow to start but Flynn was busy and then Done’s cross evaded everyone as they sought to get a foothold in the game. Barnsley had been quicker to the ball and had looked lively inside the first quarter of an hour.


The first real chance of the game saw some nice play from Barnsley but Hamill’s shot was parried by Long after good work by Fletcher. United then broke and after the referee played on, Davies dropped a cross under pressure from Sharp but Done’s effort was cleared off the line as it lacked the necessary power to score.


Not long after Flynn made an opening and from his cross, Adams hit a low shot that seemed goal bound before Davies managed to get a great full length save tipping the ball onto the post. After this chance United slowly started to take control. They won two corners and then Basham had a shot deflected over. However, despite the improvements from the home side, Barnsley felt hard done by when Flynn dithered to clear but as Fletcher stole it and then scored, the referee deemed he had been fouled in the build-up. Winnall was booked for an overly aggressive foul on Long as the keeper held before United broke but Adams was crowded out. The half time whistle came soon after.


Barnsley began after the break with some purpose and Fletcher sent an effort wide. Hammond was finally booked after he had committed a series of fouls and then Done was also cautioned for a late foul after some uncertainty in the United back line.


United were struggling to create much but a good move with Adams and Done involved saw the latter saw cross go right across goal somehow evading Sharp. At the other end Hamill fired over before Cuvellier and Woolford replaced Hammond and Done. Woolford had a cross that went across the box again with Sharp again just missing out before Fletcher missed a good chance nodding wide after Baptise had lost the ball.


In truth both teams had huffed and puffed but there has been little quality. Sammon came on for McEveley and at this stage it became reminiscent of a basketball game as both teams were attacking in an attempt to get the winner. Baptiste broke out and Sammon seemed in the clear but it was blocked out. The game entered four minutes of stoppage time and in this Sharp had a header saved and then an overhead kick over the bar. The final whistle came immediately after this. The game finished with Barnsley the happier of the two sides with neither side having done enough to win the game.


United – After some recent improvements in games, I felt we never really got going. We have been starting games really well but today we were slow and lost a lot of 50/50 battles. We never really set the initiative. We did gradually get back into the game and had a better spell from 20 minute to 40 minute mark but overall we created few chance save for the Done scrambled one off the line after keeper dropped and the Adams shot that hit the post. It was fairy even but I thought second half we would have a real go but it never happened. It was even again most of this half. We had a go at the death and a few half chances but in truth I cannot remember us having a decent effort second half and overall we did not do enough to win the game. Barnsley were no great shakes but today the passing was slow and took an age for us to execute simple things. We looked more like the side earlier in the season as we were very slow and methodical in the build-up. The tempo was slow and predictable. We just did not move it quick enough and as a result we struggled to create much. I felt they nullified our formation far better than most of the teams have recently and we struggled to create much at all.


We became very predictable and with Adams and Sharp not really linking or holding the ball up, we struggled to find an opening. The diagonal ball to Basham became our main threat as we looked to take advantage of his height advantage down this side. We did not have some of the crisp and quick passing we have and generally the touch and assuredness of our players was a long way off from what it has been in recent improved performances. Barnsley had more zest and were pressing more than many of our recent opponents. They were not great but just pressed more and looked more determined and committed than we have faced. United for me just had too many off their game and I felt for a must win game, we looked slow and laborious for too many spells. We did not do enough and as I say did not move it on quick enough or wide or even up top with any tempo. It was so laborious and as a result Barnsley got men behind the ball. Sadly, it was more reminiscent of most of the early-mid season performance’s. Today when it mattered too many did not turn up and sadly we had a second consecutive home blank. We did not have any real idea how to break Barnsley down and we were quite clueless. They did not create anything either but with a four-point cushion had less emphasis to score. We simply had to win and score but did not force the issue. Sadly, with so many slow and immobile players it makes it hard to turn teams. At times it took us 15-20 touches via 4 or 5 men to play a ball to a certain wing when it could have happened in a few seconds and a few touches. By this time the defence had got back into position. We then would do the same again to switch it to the other side. It did not help the two strikers who have played well had really poor games but even with this we never looked like creating anything from midfield and looked clueless for long spells.


A few many have thought we should maybe keep maybe showed why we should not with some very indifferent performances from quite a few when it mattered. This game more than games v Crewe/Port Vale should be a measure of why most should be released at the end of the season.


So for us our season is now all but over. We have simply not been good enough all year and despite recent improvements it has come too little, too late. It was not about today but performances over the course of the season which in truth have not been good enough. For us to be staring at 8th/9th with our wage bill and resources as Wigan canter to the League is hugely disappointing. I still feel Adkins is not safe and I am sure meetings at the end of the season will decide his fate. If he is sacked, he cannot argue really. He has overseen a poor season where we have been way off the top two places. He has not really improved things in any way. He will be nervous and know he has underachieved as he awaits his fate. With two games to play now and very little to play for but pride, United now have to think about next season. Today though was very much a microcosm of much of the season with slow play, little urgency and overall a performance that was not good enough to get what we wanted.


Barnsley – They have done great to go from bottom to 6th from when they played us before Christmas. They have gone forwards whilst we have gone sideways at best. They were full of running all game and were very determined and sadly looked fitter than us as the game went on. They were not a great side and created little but they defended well limiting us to very few chances (Adams chance and maybe a Sharp header only real chances) and will say it was a well-deserved away point.

The two lads at the back played well helped by Sharp and Adams awful touch/decisions. In midfield they were busy and pressed all game but they did not create too much with a few half chances and that was it. Although they may feel they had the best chance with the Fletcher header and also had a goal disallowed which some referees may have let it go.


I am not sure they will go up but they have a great chance now of the playoffs so who knows. A club and side that had a far less budget than us but ultimately will finish higher than us in the league now.


Opponent man of the match : Mawson. Could have been him or Roberts who defended well. Not Sharp and Adams day but these two defended well winning headers, making blocks and limiting us.


Opponent Weak link : Williams. The lad who played right back struggled with Basham until he was moved inside for the final part of the game.


SUFC Player Ratings –


Long 6/10 – Thought he was a bit shaky at times with one shot bobbling out and a few crosses which he should have took but punched instead, some of them chest height which he should have just grasped. His kicking was mixed with some quick ones out nearly finding Adams and Sharp but some kicks were awful going straight out.


Basham 7/10 – He tried to isolate a smaller full back and I felt he kept running at men and was all action. At times not even sure he knows what he is doing but is strangely effective. One of our better performers and has done well in this unfamiliar position.


Done 5.5/10 – He got up and down and put a few really good crosses in but often gambled also which led to them breaking away and leaving him woefully out of position. His touch was not great today and even despite his effort he has played better than he has today. Not sure he can defend very well and that will be a question moving forward despite his enthusiasm going the other way. Scowen caused his problems with his pace.


Baptiste 6.5/10 – Not as good as he has been but still one of our better players. He came onto the ball and always looked to be positive both defending and attacking. One slip nearly led to Fletcher scoring in the second half but overall read game well and used it well when he could. Had one run at the end when he maybe ought to have kept going when Sammon stepped in.


Edgar 6/10 – Uncertain for long spells mixed in with some steady defending. First half especially he was slow or gave it away quite a bit. He generally was not always assured in clearances or passing. Got better after the break though. Still do not think I would sign him sadly and think we could sign a younger and more mobile or commanding centre back.


McEveley 6/10 – Odd show as first half he started badly with some hesitant play dithering to clear or sending some poor passes to the opposition. He looked very unsteady overall but he got better after the break and used his body and experience to shield it out two or three times. Still today showed to me why we should not entertain bringing back players of his ilk back.


Flynn 6/10 – He got kicked a lot today and that hindered him as he spent a lot of time on the deck or limping back into play! At times he was busy but also sometimes ran into blind alleys and there was little end product. I felt any influence he had lessened as the game went on. A very ordinary performance and another that to me needs to be moved on.


Hammond 4/10 – Awful for most of the game. After recent improvements where he has broken it up and kept it simple and done a steady job, today he did nothing of the sort. Fouled constantly often going to ground before he did upend an opponent. Gave the ball away a lot and also played a lot of short/loose balls too. Always running after players and chasing them as his legs showed he could not keep up with many. Once second half a Barnsley player just jogged past him and that was sign for Adkins to give him the hook. He surely must see his legs have gone? He got booked when he should have been cautioned a long time before. When he went off it was a change that was cheered. That says it all. Would be a nonsensical signing.


Coutts 7/10 – Might have been our best player. Sure he gave it away a few times and he too was slow to do what was needed but showed some lovely touches and control (the ball he took high from the clouds a casing point) and always at least looked to prompt or try and find a shirt. He never looks like really driving forward/scoring (the ridiculous long range shot when the keeper came and kicked summed it up) but at least he was neat and tidy. Sadly, as with most of the team no real penetration.


Adams 5/10 – Not his day. Started game ok with some decent runs and hold ups but then things started to ping off him. He did have our best effort with the low shot saved via the post. Second half felt he made some poor decisions with some silly flicks and he got rid of it too quick. I felt he needed to just get it, turn and run at the defence but almost seemed obsessed with giving and going.


Sharp 4/10 – His worst game this season for me. Nothing he did worked. He lost it when it came to him, did not hold it up and was sloppy in all aspects of play. Had one header he should have done better with and then a wild volley over at the end. Also missed two crosses which came over. Just one of those games really.


Subs


Cuvelier – Came on for the poor Hammond but he was even worse. I actually do not think he did anything right. He was abysmal. Maybe could not adjust to the pace of the game but was hardly breakneck! Weak, poor touch and slow to react. He looks overweight and still unfit (after three years). I thought he looked woeful to be honest and out of his depth (even at League One level). Amazed some fans think he is worth keeping around. Has to be released. Three seasons and barely a decent performance in that time.


Woolford – He tried to get down the wing and actually got one decent cross in which missed everyone.


Sammon – Brought on as many jeered as he entered the field. Even though I am not his biggest fan I had no issues with his entrance today and actually would have introduced him earlier. We had nothing going up top so he was a different look. Sadly had one chance but seemed to take an age and then his shot was blocked away (not sure it was going in anyway).


Manager – Adkins 5/10 – He picked the same team which was to be expected but I felt today he needed to change it earlier as nothing was happening. We started game slow and then after we picked up, we then began second half poorly and in same languid style. I felt either by personnel or formation he needed to try something different but sadly he did not and the game kind of petered out. The Sammon change was too little too late. We started going for it but it was only with a few minutes left we started this cavalier attitude. I wish we had gone for it much earlier.


Ref – Coote. Was fine really. He tried to let it go but brought it back when he could. The goal he disallowed seemed to be a pullback but some neutrals suggest United were a bit fortunate. The Hammond, Hammill, Winnall and Cuvellier bookings were obvious. Hourihane’s foul was awful on Basham but sadly where it was meant it could not be red no matter how cynical it was. I felt he had no help from his assistants who often just guessed.


Crowd – Good crowd of 23,307. Barnsley brought best following of the season to the Lane with maybe 4,-4,500 away fans (?) inside the ground having most of the top tier (not the corner) and even some in the bottom tier. They were vocal throughout against an oddly quite United following who with few chances and the sadly slow tempo of most of the season, struggled to give them such backing. United fans were quite frustrated with the slow and often negative play as the side failed to get it forward quickly or create many chances of note all game.
Good report DB, although Woolfords cross didn't just miss everyone, he passes the ball straight to their GK, it was shocking after he brought the ball down brilliantly and got into a great position after what was the ball of the afternoon from Baptiste, I think it was him anyway.
 
As derbies typically are, a war that are generally not full of quality, even game both teams could've won & Amazed ive seen over 3hrs of football in last 2 games 2 of most hotly contested end to end this season they were both consecutive 0-0, but I thought at times we ended up in a Habit of Possession without having any direction or purpose, as too many times we had 1 pass too many. Woolford angered me hugely few mins to go in on goal In the penalty area loads of room & instead of having a shot he passes it too sharp who been marked out their 2 CB'S

Also surprised that adkins didn't bring calvert-lewin on or if were desperate salmmon, because by 70 mins you could see that sharp & adams were tired in need of fresh legs. Because they weren't able to sprint after the balls like they could 1st half
 
Although Basham tried hard (and I presume Done was trying as well) I thought it was our paucity of quality out wide that stuffed us.

Twice from the left, Done once, Woolford once, we got in great position and didn't deliver as we should, on the other side Bash couldn't actually get around his man (albeit the once he managed it and looked dangerous he was the victim of the most cynical "tackle" I've seen since Revie's Leeds perfected it) and, as such, I think the CB's were never in trouble and could concentrate on keeping Sharp and Adams firmly subdued.

As said, I can see why the ref blew for a foul on Flynn but I'd have been livid if we'd had a goal chalked off for something as tame as that tackle.

0-0, absolutely correct scoreline for me.
 
Although Basham tried hard (and I presume Done was trying as well) I thought it was our paucity of quality out wide that stuffed us.

Twice from the left, Done once, Woolford once, we got in great position and didn't deliver as we should, on the other side Bash couldn't actually get around his man (albeit the once he managed it and looked dangerous he was the victim of the most cynical "tackle" I've seen since Revie's Leeds perfected it) and, as such, I think the CB's were never in trouble and could concentrate on keeping Sharp and Adams firmly subdued.

As said, I can see why the ref blew for a foul on Flynn but I'd have been livid if we'd had a goal chalked off for something as tame as that tackle.

0-0, absolutely correct scoreline for me.
Great observations G2000.

A few gave Coutts or Basham Motm but I thought Baptiste deserved it, it's strange how people see it so differently because Basham didn't do a thing for me, albeit tried hard which i think should be the minimum requirement for a player with limited ability.
 
Although Basham tried hard (and I presume Done was trying as well) I thought it was our paucity of quality out wide that stuffed us.

Twice from the left, Done once, Woolford once, we got in great position and didn't deliver as we should, on the other side Bash couldn't actually get around his man (albeit the once he managed it and looked dangerous he was the victim of the most cynical "tackle" I've seen since Revie's Leeds perfected it) and, as such, I think the CB's were never in trouble and could concentrate on keeping Sharp and Adams firmly subdued.

As said, I can see why the ref blew for a foul on Flynn but I'd have been livid if we'd had a goal chalked off for something as tame as that tackle.

0-0, absolutely correct scoreline for me.
Spot on,I've been saying for a while that the service from wide areas has been poor..I was particularly frustrated by Done,but Bash didn't do much better..going forward anyway,as he was OK defensively...Agree a draw was about right...Wouldn't have minded seeing DCL coming on up top,as he has the pace to run in behind ,which Billy and Che couldn't.
 
Agree with all of that.. as i said in another post i thought we were strangely flat for large parts of the game.. amazing when you consider the potential rewards at stake. Adkins should have put some fresh legs on in midfield much earlier and brought the young lads on. personally i would have stuck Done up front as Billy was having 'one of those games' where nothing was coming off for him. Can't criticise the lad really, without him we'd have been near the relegation zone. Adams needs the ball to feet FACING THE GOAL, not with his back to it. he needs to run at teams, it frightens the life out of them
Our real problem is our midfield. we don't have one. Bash did ok but with Coutts (fancy flicks, great control no end product), Hammond (always seems to pass short, someone will end up in hospital) and Flynn (can't stand up, couldn't tackle a paper bag), Done totally out of position/sorts we are going nowhere as we have no drive in this area.
Massive clearout needed. If Adkins signs Hammond, the fans will turn on him if they haven't already.



I think the opposition had a lot to do with us looking flat. Barnsley were the fittest and most tenacious team I’ve seen at the lane this season. Not that surprising when you consider how young their squad is.


Fletcher looked a talent if very raw. Brownhill’s one I’d like to see us sign for our midfield next season.


They were no great shakes with the ball (odd moment from Hammill) but they pressed better than anyone I’ve seen this season. Coutts, Hammond and Flynn had a horrible time as they just couldn’t settle on the ball. That meant we tried to hit the front 2 quicker at times but their inter-play wasn’t coming off. You can tell it’s something they’re instructed to do but at times today, it was so rushed with poor weighting of the short passes to each other. Both needed to try to get hold of the ball a bit more and show some composure which was lacking from both teams.


It was a game full of endeavour, battling and scrapping. A typical ‘derby’ (I use that term loosely for the dingles) if you like. Neither side could quite muster the quality required to prize the game open but when we did go for it in the last 5-10 minutes, we moved the ball much better with some passes zipping around resulting in Sammon’s chance, Sharp almost meeting Woolford’s ball and a couple of half chances for Sharp at the death.


Overall, we came up just short but I was reasonably impressed with the effort and willingness to put bodies on the line and have to give credit to our six fingered neighbours as their team made it very difficult for us.


I actually thought Edgar was our MoM. Seemed to deal with everything they offered going forward and I don’t think he got caught in possession or gave it away cheaply the way Baptiste and McEveley did a couple of times each.


Overall, I think it showed where we are. Moving in the right direction in terms of endeavour and team spirit (not getting hammered by poor teams just cos they’re up for it and we’re not) but still lacking that bit of quality of genuine promotion contenders. We could probably get away with only signing 3 players in the summer if they were very good players (on top of Edgar and Hammond) for this level. CB, LWB and CM. Ideally we could do with a decent GK to challenge Long and a useful big man option up front.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K16
I agree re Flo, I watched him closely today. I think he's allegedly one of the top earners but whenever I've seen him I really don't see anything to justify it. Ran around a bit but with little impact and when he got the ball he looks to get rid asap rather than make a play for something, which I thought was his usp. He made one good tackle. Nowt else. I'd love to see our wage bill, who is coming off it and who could realistically fill the gaps with the budget left.

As an aside I heard from a Leeds fan that when they signed Murphy from Crewe he was on a grand a week (ish) and they banged him on around £15k. (Which is lunacy considering he'd never played in the champ) If someone is a stand out player in this league (or a shitty Scottish league) we should be able to double whatever Crewe/Bury/Southend *insert the majority of clubs here, and they should come. (Maybe with an incentive with promotion) If not fuck them. I have a feeling we acquiesce to demands of players rather than seeing if they want to come and prove they are worth it.

Sir Bob described his negotiations today, he was made an offer, went outside to discuss it with his dad. Did a little "yes!" In the corridor. Went back in, before he opened his mouth was told that there was no more money. He said "that's fine, where's the pen?" . . . If a player is in our league, he should want to come here. Let's sweep up the best ones (that aren't obviously worth a couple of mill) and go from there.


I think we flirted with that plan when we signed the likes of Baxter, Cuvelier, Wallace, Alcock, JCR etc. OK not the best ones but league 1 players with decent reputations. Perhaps we’ve been put off by the relatively poor return we’ve had.
 



Great report Deadbat - in a nutshell Barnsley worked harder, were better balanced, were faster and fitter and all that helps to achieve results.

Average age of the players on the pitch: Us 27 years. Them 23 years. Barnsley have a "Pathway for Youth".

Coutts did OK with the ball but doesn't even pretend to tackle or track back, can't give a player more than 5 when he only does half a job.

Coutts and Hammond played more at the pace of the Walking Football we saw at half time. Hammond was as bad as ever, only assertive kicks he produces are on players, never passes. They were overwhelmed by Barnsley's energy and couldn't cope; should never play them both in the same midfield.

All Back 3 scored at least one more each for me, in fact Baptiste 8, Edgar 8 McEv 7. Long 1 less and Flynn 1 more. Coutts 5.

Midfield is where we lost it. Barnsley worked harder, had two excellent wide men and played with a togetherness. Our best ploy, which we overplayed, was that big punt from Long to Basham's head; sorry that's 60's football mentality. We also punted far too many high balls up to Sharp and that's just ludicrous, no wonder heir defenders had such a good time. Quick passing moves from us, maybe 2/3 all game.

The manager brought Sammon on with 3 minutes to go, Woolford with 7 minutes to go, Cuvelier with 17 minutes to go. He was a startled rabbit without a clue how to turn the game which we had to win. Sharp and Adams were unable to cope, Coutts, Flynn and Hammond were overwhelmed all game, Done and Basham are not wing backs. From the hour mark we were crying out for changes to personnel and playing pattern but it didn't come, leaving the cavalry charge until 85 minutes is a last ditch gamble which will pay off occasinally. Making calculated substitutions and changing the formation around 60/70 minutes is much wiser.

Barnsley's wide men Hammill and Isgrove were excellent second half in particular. Their two central defenders were outstanding. Adkins will have access to mileage stas and I suggest Barnsley's workrate and effort will be reflected by a margin commensurate with the ages of the players, something like 27:23 ratio i.e. 20% more. I'm not saying United players didn't try, a number sank to their haunches at the final whistle as a result of sheer effort and disappointment, they just haven't got it in their tanks.



I agree that Barnsley were fitter and more athletic in midfield but you criticise a number of our players whilst praising theirs and say they worked harder etc. Your post gives an impression that we were outplayed, outworked and outthought when in reality, we had more possession, more shots, more corners. We shaded the game over all but didn’t quite have enough to break them down. There was little between the teams but their youthful exuberance certainly made it difficult for us to settle in midfield.


For what it’s worth, I would have put Woolford on for Done and either DCL or Sammon on for Flynn around the 70 minute mark. I suppose Hammond had to come off due to his customary booking. I’d have probably gone for Whiteman or Reed (if he had been named on the bench) over Flo who will surely be a goner at the end of the season.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom