sacking manager after manager has been the single factor in our inability to go up.
Every year we fail, we sack whichever poor bastard has the job and roll the dice again. Manager No. 284648 comes in and has to deal with a mish mash of players bought in under the reigns of the previous three, none of which form a team but rather a collective of individuals because they've been bought in by various different blokes to fit with whatever the previous blokes were in the process of building before the rug was pulled with 30% of the job done. He has to rebuild, isn't given the time, gets sacked and we're back at square one again.
We now have a watershed moment whereby we can have a clear out, allow the bloke we've currently got to actually have a stab at doing it his way without the shackles of contracted players he doesn't want or need but has to crowbar in because nothing else is available or affordable due to the aforementioned unwanted players chewing up the playing budget.
This season has been wank. There is no sugar coating that and Adkins has to shoulder the blame for that. Some of his signings have been poor but I don't blame him for turning to his old pals when he's surrounded by inexperience, inability or, if rumours are believed, disruptive attitudes splitting the camp. Hammond, Woolford et al are sticking plasters to stem the bleeding before the summer surgery.
Can we please, just for once, let a manager have a bit of time to have a proper go, his way, with a team full of his players, before we decide he's been a failure? Or do we just keep going around the same circles that have failed for the past half decade?
If your answer to that is 'no' ask yourself if we'd have been better of sticking with Clough, or Wilson before him? Perhaps the only one we were correct to sack, with hindsight, was Wier. Sacking hasn't worked before, and it won't work now.