Has she ever visited Scandals in Chap? If she has, chances are brownie has met her before - possibly along with a mate of hers at the same timeshe has never met you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Has she ever visited Scandals in Chap? If she has, chances are brownie has met her before - possibly along with a mate of hers at the same timeshe has never met you
For Pompey too, though it's probably a waste of time of course.
The following are mostly guesses!! off the top of my head.. Brayford £1.75m, Done £ 700k, Coutts say £250k, Sharp £500k, Adams £200k, McNulty £300k, Scougall £300k, Wallace J. £250k, Flynn £300k, Cuvelier £400k, Baxter £400k. Total £5.3m
Haven't those purchases been balanced out by the sale of our best players in Maguire and Murphy, the cup semi-final, (less cost of new pitch) together with the Man U cup game gate receipts?
Only my opinion, but I assume the Princes investment is purely propping up the wage bill and nothing more, which is concerning when the numbers quoted by Phipps are so substantial. One thing is certain, which ever way you look at it, we certainly aren't getting value for money
Kmc is the man at the top. He sets the budget and appoints the managers.
Like or not the buck stops with him.
^^^This
But all this talk about 'sack the board' is ludicrous. Who can sack the board? Until we get new investment - serious new investment which will be able to compete with the cash-rich top two divisions - we're reliant on McCabe and I'm afraid his 'fortune' is loose change nowadays. He's done well to keep us ticking along but the chickens are now coming home to roost. So we're stuck with McCabe and the board for the forseeable.
Where I would blame McCabe is his disastrous recruitment policy - the managers. When Adkins goes, it will be followed by the usual navel-gazing and talk of 'We can't keep sacking managers'. No, we can't keep employing crap managers. Whatever their past successes - and most of our managers post-Warnock have not had any past success - must have a very easy ride at interview stage. As most things about football now involve a scientific approach, conversely it would seem that the board's mind is made up before the manager in front of them even attends the interview.
Are questions - precluding all talk of 'past successes', this is the here and now - like 'Which coaches do you admire?', 'Why?', 'How do you think you could emulate that at United?', 'How much do you think you would need to begin this reconstruction?', 'What tactics do you envisage employing?', 'Which young, up-and-coming players do you admire and do you think you could attract them to Bramall Lane?'
All obvious stuff, but would Adkins have passed any of that? (If he was honest, he'd fail on every question). They just 'tell a good story' and, when employed, insist on bringing their old mates - background staff and players - who may have been OK a few years ago, but aren't up to it now.
Football has changed enormously in the last 5 years and continuously evolves. Chelsea, for all their spending, are also-rans in the PL while bright, young outfits like Watford and Palace are out-performing them. The days of 't'local lad made good' being chairman are long gone. Look at Wendy. Having kissed enough frogs (and chancers) in their search for a new owner - Sheard, Strapon, Azerbaijan-man and even Mandaric - haven't just 'struck lucky' with Chansiri. They scoured the globe. Ditto managers. While Dave Jones, Stuart Grey, Megson, Irvine, Laws, Sturrock will take you so far, they're incapable of driving the club forward. Who had heard of Carvalhal? Again, they didn't 'get lucky'. Somebody had done serious background searches.
In a bit, I'll be setting off for the Lane. A task I find about as appealing nowadays as a trip to the dentist. Adkins' latest motivational talk will be ringing in my ears. 'It will get worse before it gets better.' Well, he's had 2/3rds of a season to regress the club to it's lowest point in decades. Under Adkins, it will get worse. It might get better when he's gone and the board step into 21st century reality.
I think one of the main points made in the original post was that McCabe really should make a statement which may dispel a few myths or confirm that there are difficulties and how they are being addressed. And despite all the ranting on here. I can't see there is anyone who'd disagree with that.
Also McCabe has invested loads if time and money and is a Blade like the rest if us. But he's been unsuccessful for the last 8 years and made some very bad decisions. He's acknowledged that.
The Bury performance alarmed me for all the reasons well explained above. There was no bite, aggression, leadership, will to win. They flattered to deceive for give minutes at the beginning of each half and that was all. They were individually poor and collectively the team were less than the sum of its parts indicating poor coaching/ management/instruction. No controversy there.
We are all angry and very upset, but why in looking for a bit of insight and collective understanding on a forum do fellow supporters want to abuse each other. And its an open forum why would you use language that some would find very offensive? It just makes you look stupid and devalues the points you want to make.
Less heat and a bit more light eh?
The bloke can't win![]()
Brayford 1,5 ?A lot to get your teeth into there....I'm struggling with this one firstly..
Billy perhaps (quoted at around £500k) and..?
I understand why Kevin McCabe took a communication backseat since Jim Phipps assumed the role of fronting the club. For whatever reason Jim has gone quiet just when leadership is most needed and McCabe needs to fill the void.
The fans are hurting and without a clear and coherent message from the club, people will make up their own mind - often based on half-truth, rumour and myth.
When things are bad - and let's all be honest, they are dire right now - it's natural to look for someone to blame. Most supporters, for now, seem reluctant to blame Adkins, so the players and the owners get it instead.
McCabe seems to be getting a lot of stick - much of which seems unjustified and based on the aforementioned myths and rumours. Before any bandwagon aimed at his removal gathers pace, there are a few things we should remember:
- his family have put around £90m to the club in chasing the dream.
- despite rumours to the contrary he continues to invest alongside the Prince (I understand another £8m this season alone)
- he is first and foremost a supporter, who actually cares about the club (pretty rare nowadays)
The last two managers (both popular appointments amongst supporters) have been backed financially and given plenty of scope to make their own decisions. The current team cost around £4m in transfer fees and we must have the biggest wage bill after 'parachuting Wigan.'
I'm not saying mistakes haven't been made, including by McCabe, but he is not the reason we're under-performing at present. We probably need him more than ever right now.
I am sure one of our leaders will make an appearance shortly just before the season ticket renewal drops on our doormats, promising a new dawn, long term plan.
McCabe seems to be getting a lot of stick - much of which seems unjustified and based on the aforementioned myths and rumours. Before any bandwagon aimed at his removal gathers pace, there are a few things we should remember:
- his family have put around £90m to the club in chasing the dream.
- despite rumours to the contrary he continues to invest alongside the Prince (I understand another £8m this season alone)
- he is first and foremost a supporter, who actually cares about the club (pretty rare nowadays)
The last two managers (both popular appointments amongst supporters) have been backed financially and given plenty of scope to make their own decisions. The current team cost around £4m in transfer fees and we must have the biggest wage bill after 'parachuting Wigan.'
It probably has, hence my ongoing questioning of the costs of running the club.Can I ask what leads you to believe £8 million has been invested this season?
Can I ask what leads you to believe £8 million has been invested this season?
Scarily accurate to what McCabe has just said today![]()
Scarily accurate to what McCabe has just said today![]()
I understand why Kevin McCabe took a communication backseat since Jim Phipps assumed the role of fronting the club. For whatever reason Jim has gone quiet just when leadership is most needed and McCabe needs to fill the void.
The fans are hurting and without a clear and coherent message from the club, people will make up their own mind - often based on half-truth, rumour and myth.
When things are bad - and let's all be honest, they are dire right now - it's natural to look for someone to blame. Most supporters, for now, seem reluctant to blame Adkins, so the players and the owners get it instead.
McCabe seems to be getting a lot of stick - much of which seems unjustified and based on the aforementioned myths and rumours. Before any bandwagon aimed at his removal gathers pace, there are a few things we should remember:
- his family have put around £90m to the club in chasing the dream.
- despite rumours to the contrary he continues to invest alongside the Prince (I understand another £8m this season alone)
- he is first and foremost a supporter, who actually cares about the club (pretty rare nowadays)
The last two managers (both popular appointments amongst supporters) have been backed financially and given plenty of scope to make their own decisions. The current team cost around £4m in transfer fees and we must have the biggest wage bill after 'parachuting Wigan.'
I'm not saying mistakes haven't been made, including by McCabe, but he is not the reason we're under-performing at present. We probably need him more than ever right now.
The figure came from Kevin McCabe.
No coincidence as he told me.
Yeah, but to what standard did you play football?
This thread started with a quality OP and look at it now. Each poster should look at himself and reflect how he/she spoiled the thread.
For my part, I regret getting trying to achieve some balance in the thread by correcting wild nonsense by Pommpey whose first post on the thread was further repetition of his usual vulgar rants.
I understand why Kevin McCabe took a communication backseat since Jim Phipps assumed the role of fronting the club. For whatever reason Jim has gone quiet just when leadership is most needed and McCabe needs to fill the void.
The fans are hurting and without a clear and coherent message from the club, people will make up their own mind - often based on half-truth, rumour and myth.
When things are bad - and let's all be honest, they are dire right now - it's natural to look for someone to blame. Most supporters, for now, seem reluctant to blame Adkins, so the players and the owners get it instead.
McCabe seems to be getting a lot of stick - much of which seems unjustified and based on the aforementioned myths and rumours. Before any bandwagon aimed at his removal gathers pace, there are a few things we should remember:
- his family have put around £90m to the club in chasing the dream.
- despite rumours to the contrary he continues to invest alongside the Prince (I understand another £8m this season alone)
- he is first and foremost a supporter, who actually cares about the club (pretty rare nowadays)
The last two managers (both popular appointments amongst supporters) have been backed financially and given plenty of scope to make their own decisions. The current team cost around £4m in transfer fees and we must have the biggest wage bill after 'parachuting Wigan.'
I'm not saying mistakes haven't been made, including by McCabe, but he is not the reason we're under-performing at present. We probably need him more than ever right now.
After today's interview, please explain how you quoted the exact £90m investment figure quoted by KM and which I have never heard before ( but understood and ratified) and the £4m transfer fees for the current squad ( which was understated IMO).
Please explain.
I don't understand why everybody makes it seem complicated.
Forget luck, forget plans, it all boils down to one simple equation.
The teams that do well improve their team every year. The teams that don't...don't.
Every year since we got relegated to this division, our team has got worse every season due to selling our best players and replacing them with crap. I reckon if we still had Blackman, McDonald, Maguire, Murphy and had improved by adding 1 or 2 good players every year, we would now be in the top half of the championship. The board have sold promotion down the river every single year and whilst that continues we won't go up in a million years of trying.
I don't accept this premise and would hold a player to his contract
The figure came from Kevin McCabe.
No coincidence as he told me.
After today's interview, please explain how you quoted the exact £90m investment figure quoted by KM and which I have never heard before ( but understood and ratified) and the £4m transfer fees for the current squad ( which was understated IMO).
Please explain.
But you just haveI have no doubt the McCabe family has pumped £90 million in over the years in loans and share purchases. Some loans have been repaid but I'd suggest he's still around £60 million down. £37 million alone is shown in the football club accounts if you want to see it.
He didn't say he'd lost or it owed him £90 mill. He said that's what they'd put in over the years. I wouldn't disbelieve him for one minute.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?