My Best Case Scenario and the Sting in the Tail.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Woodwardfan

Woodwardfan
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
8,920
Reaction score
8,131
Location
Whitby
I must say that I am extremely disappointed with our results this season and to a slightly lesser degree with our performances.

When Clough was sacked I was mightily relieved and when Adkins was appointed I was delighted.

I like Adkins and his positive outlook. He seems a genuinely nice bloke and he is always ready to praise his players when at all possible. He is open with fans and his interviews are careful but honest. To date his team has not enjoyed much luck but it has to be said "you make your own luck" and the form of some of the players, both Adkins signings and inherited players, has been well below par.

Injuries to key players in the squad have not helped at all and being appointed in June did not leave Adkins with a lot of time to assess the squad before the season started. A promising pre-season was misleading as it turns out and the loss of the key services of Matt Done for a long spell was cruel.

For understandable reasons Adkins made Sharp a "talisman signing" and he also quickly brought in Woolford because he happened to be available. Sammon joined us for much the same reason I guess and it seemed to make sense as a foil for Sharp. Edgar seemed a good signing once the central defence situation was assessed in proper competition.

We are now 8th in the league after 17 games and 2 points below play-off positions, 9 points below automatic spots. Of course that can be recovered and more by May next year but is that all we need as a club?

I would always maintain that relegation to any division is an opportunity for any club to take stock, re-group and go back up stronger. Looking at us now we are a ragbag outfit of individuals who do not look as though they have played together that often and do not have a pattern of playing. After 5 months under the new manager it is a serious matter that one can think and say that but I do feel the footballing gods have not been with Adkins at any stage. Nevertheless the lack of bottle and character in the squad has not helped the manager.

Back to the re-build theme and going back up stronger and in good shape to compete for a double promotion like Southampton did.

Adkins is investing in Adams, fair enough. He is trying to establish Long in the lad's interest but also in the hope he can make the step up, fair enough. Which other squad players could play in a strong side in the Championship, given a promotion season in L1 and all the joy and confidence that breeds?

He has Brayford, Done, Basham at the back, Baxter, Sammon in his own way and if he stays, Harris maybe, probably not, Freeman if he develops well this season, Edgar? if he stays, Hammond is an unknown quantity to us and if he stays, Reed, Calvert-Lewin?

Worryingly the future of Done is clouded for me at the moment and three of those other names are loanees. In other words we can't even name half a team of current players who seem remotely capable of making the step up.

My best case scenario now is to give Adams,Reed, Long, Freeman, Baxter, Wallace and maybe even Calvert-Lewin loads of game time this season and start next season with a group of little gems all playing well together alongside some seasoned pros of the quality of Brayford, Done, Sharp etc. If that happens to be at the higher level after a couple of great JTW signings all well and good, but the most promising future of SUFC lies with those younger players who need game time and to play with each other now. Add a few clever signings next summer and we can begin to make a serious comeback not just a tentative scramble.

If we have to wait another year for promotion then so be it but if we were to squeeze up there with this group of strangers and journeymen, even adding a few more journeymen or ageing has-beens then we would suffer for years to come.

We need to break the mold.

All that sounds good maybe but putting something like this to paper makes me think how on earth does a club in our position keep a group of young players together? My best case scenario is actually pie in the sky for us Blades fans. No matter which Board or which players are involved, the modern game does not allow a club like ours to rebuild in that way. Have keyboard tantrum after tantrum fellow Blades but in the above scenario we simply will not be able to keep Adams, Reed and even Long if they develop as they could in a successful promotion winning side.

Adkins knows that and still has to do a job. He lost players at Southampton on the way and in many ways it was just the price of success. What has to be done is to ensure a supply of replacement players both through the Academy and by way of transfers in. The Board have to keep investing too and add that to transfer income to help improve the overall standards incrementally. Adkins has been through it all before and knows his Academy Manager and his Head Scout are key figures.

He's trying to revive Long's career, surely Reed has to be next and then don't be surprised to see Calvert-Lewin featuring in the New Year. I feel in my bones he will start building for a promotion push for next season as well as prioritising the development of younger players. Why not?
 
Last edited:



Adkins has been ignoring Reed recently despite him playing well in every game from half time at Bradford onwards. He's not even been in the squad most weeks and that doesn't seem right at all. So I don't expect him to prioritise Reed in any way. Maybe he thinks he's too small. But none of our other midfielders have been playing better than he was.
 
He's trying to revive Long's career, surely Reed has to be next and then don't be surprised to see Calvert-Lewin featuring in the New Year. I feel in my bones he will start building for a promotion push for next season as well as prioritising the development of younger players. Why not?

I don't think he's reviving Long's career out of the goodness of his heart or bc he's a Blade. Long made some really excellent saves against Fleetwood (from the highlights). If he can work on his confidence and command of his area he could be a very good keeper. This seemed to be in evidence on Satdi. The George Long I know doesn't venture much beyond his six yard box. I thought it was really telling against Worcester when he ventured out on to the left back position. It looked simple but it's something I can't ever remember him doing. His distribution is often quicker than Howard's as well - though he seems much more one-footed.

I'd guess Howard is (wrongly in more than one way) taking flak from the crowd as well - and that's affecting his confidence.

Reed I think (just a guess) has been assessed as not yet physically strong enough. He has obvious talents and I think will make it in the game somewhere - but maybe not yet at United if we want or get promotion.

DCL looked lightweight at Orient last season. His time at Northampton will be ideal - but he'll have to go some going to break into a promotion chasing first team. He'd have to be scoring better than a goal every two games and/or contributing in other ways to make a significant difference.
 
When we first got relegated to this league (from a galaxy far far away) I said we needed to concentrate on youth and build a squad capable of getting up, staying up and going up. None of our managers have thus far done it. Wilson and Clough flirted with youth players in pre-seasons then they were largely banished from squads by September.

I'd rather wait a season and build the kind of team and momentum we need.

However, given how we like to mess everything up, I'd accept any opportunity to get out of this league.
 
We can't afford another season in league one simple as that, the stadium will be less than half full if it is to be league one again next season plus we all know the board WILL sell all these "little gems" you speak of because as you know we can't force them to stay if they request to leave. We need to achieve promotion this season some how if not I fear many many many more years in the 3rd and maybe 4th tier. I actually fear for our long term future if we don't go up.
 
"... being appointed in June did not leave Adkins with a lot of time to assess the squad before the season started. "

Adkins had virtually the whole summer, pre-season and the first few league games of this season to see what the problems are, the blindingly obvious being a dominant centre half that wins all the first balls and who had all the leadership qualities you'd expect from a player in that position. Adkins instead gave the captaincy to McEveley and played him at centre half. All this in my book is inexcusable.

I don't think it's rocket science to get out of this division (although a number of successive managers have now attempted to unsuccessfully reinvent the wheel, when it hasn't been necessary to do so) ie big lads in key positions with big hearts, that meet fire with fire.

I've not written this season off yet but it's essential Adkins gets in, either now on loan, or when the JTW opens (first week, not scratching around at the 11th hour blaming dodgy fax machines for failed transfers), 3 players straight down the spine, all leaders, all who want it, centre half, centre mid and target man. They don't particularly have to be world beaters, just be prepared to knock down brick walls to win and get the best out of the other 8 on the field. It's a shit division, if we get it right it is possible to bang out the wins, go months with out defeat and storm the division.
 
When we first got relegated to this league (from a galaxy far far away) I said we needed to concentrate on youth and build a squad capable of getting up, staying up and going up. None of our managers have thus far done it. Wilson and Clough flirted with youth players in pre-seasons then they were largely banished from squads by September.

I'd rather wait a season and build the kind of team and momentum we need.

However, given how we like to mess everything up, I'd accept any opportunity to get out of this league.

Agree pal, it's time to get out of this league, can 't stand it anymore. We are Sheffield United FFS.
 
"... being appointed in June did not leave Adkins with a lot of time to assess the squad before the season started. "

Adkins had virtually the whole summer, pre-season and the first few league games of this season to see what the problems are, the blindingly obvious being a dominant centre half that wins all the first balls and who had all the leadership qualities you'd expect from a player in that position. Adkins instead gave the captaincy to McEveley and played him at centre half. All this in my book is inexcusable.

I don't think it's rocket science to get out of this division (although a number of successive managers have now attempted to unsuccessfully reinvent the wheel, when it hasn't been necessary to do so) ie big lads in key positions with big hearts, that meet fire with fire.

I've not written this season off yet but it's essential Adkins gets in, either now on loan, or when the JTW opens (first week, not scratching around at the 11th hour blaming dodgy fax machines for failed transfers), 3 players straight down the spine, all leaders, all who want it, centre half, centre mid and target man. They don't particularly have to be world beaters, just be prepared to knock down brick walls to win and get the best out of the other 8 on the field. It's a shit division, if we get it right it is possible to bang out the wins, go months with out defeat and storm the division.

100% spot on pal, I have said it before and will no doubt say it again, when the blue and white scum pipped us to automatic, they only had three first team players under 6 feet tall. They were a big, aggressive team. Also, when we played Stoke in the championship, the season they went up., they had a team of giants. I remember the teams lining up before kick off, and it looked like boys against men.

Skillful players are great, of course, but sometimes you just need big, hard lads, who would rather be carried off on a stretcher than concede the ball. Terry Kennedy is like this, but his knees let him down.
 
I must say that I am extremely disappointed with our results this season and to a slightly lesser degree with our performances.

When Clough was sacked I was mightily relieved and when Adkins was appointed I was delighted.

I like Adkins and his positive outlook. He seems a genuinely nice bloke and he is always ready to praise his players when at all possible. He is open with fans and his interviews are careful but honest. To date his team has not enjoyed much luck but it has to be said "you make your own luck" and the form of some of the players, both Adkins signings and inherited players, has been well below par.

Injuries to key players in the squad have not helped at all and being appointed in June did not leave Adkins with a lot of time to assess the squad before the season started. A promising pre-season was misleading as it turns out and the loss of the key services of Matt Done for a long spell was cruel.

For understandable reasons Adkins made Sharp a "talisman signing" and he also quickly brought in Woolford because he happened to be available. Sammon joined us for much the same reason I guess and it seemed to make sense as a foil for Sharp. Edgar seemed a good signing once the central defence situation was assessed in proper competition.

We are now 8th in the league after 17 games and 2 points below play-off positions, 9 points below automatic spots. Of course that can be recovered and more by May next year but is that all we need as a club?

I would always maintain that relegation to any division is an opportunity for any club to take stock, re-group and go back up stronger. Looking at us now we are a ragbag outfit of individuals who do not look as though they have played together that often and do not have a pattern of playing. After 5 months under the new manager it is a serious matter that one can think and say that but I do feel the footballing gods have not been with Adkins at any stage. Nevertheless the lack of bottle and character in the squad has not helped the manager.

Back to the re-build theme and going back up stronger and in good shape to compete for a double promotion like Southampton did.

Adkins is investing in Adams, fair enough. He is trying to establish Long in the lad's interest but also in the hope he can make the step up, fair enough. Which other squad players could play in a strong side in the Championship, given a promotion season in L1 and all the joy and confidence that breeds?

He has Brayford, Done, Basham at the back, Baxter, Sammon in his own way and if he stays, Harris maybe, probably not, Freeman if he develops well this season, Edgar? if he stays, Hammond is an unknown quantity to us and if he stays, Reed, Calvert-Lewin?

Worryingly the future of Done is clouded for me at the moment and three of those other names are loanees. In other words we can't even name half a team of current players who seem remotely capable of making the step up.

My best case scenario now is to give Adams,Reed, Long, Freeman, Baxter, Wallace and maybe even Calvert-Lewin loads of game time this season and start next season with a group of little gems all playing well together alongside some seasoned pros of the quality of Brayford, Done, Sharp etc. If that happens to be at the higher level after a couple of great JTW signings all well and good, but the most promising future of SUFC lies with those younger players who need game time and to play with each other now. Add a few clever signings next summer and we can begin to make a serious comeback not just a tentative scramble.


If we have to wait another year for promotion then so be it but if we were to squeeze up there with this group of strangers and journeymen, even adding a few more journeymen or ageing has-beens then we would suffer for years to come.

We need to break the mold.

All that sounds good maybe but putting something like this to paper makes me think how on earth does a club in our position keep a group of young players together? My best case scenario is actually pie in the sky for us Blades fans. No matter which Board or which players are involved, the modern game does not allow a club like ours to rebuild in that way. Have keyboard tantrum after tantrum fellow Blades but in the above scenario we simply will not be able to keep Adams, Reed and even Long if they develop as they could in a successful promotion winning side.

Adkins knows that and still has to do a job. He lost players at Southampton on the way and in many ways it was just the price of success. What has to be done is to ensure a supply of replacement players both through the Academy and by way of transfers in. The Board have to keep investing too and add that to transfer income to help improve the overall standards incrementally. Adkins has been through it all before and knows his Academy Manager and his Head Scout are key figures.

He's trying to revive Long's career, surely Reed has to be next and then don't be surprised to see Calvert-Lewin featuring in the New Year. I feel in my bones he will start building for a promotion push for next season as well as prioritising the development of younger players. Why not?
Clough took over after the season when we were bottom of the league ,took us close to the play offs and a semi ,followed by another semi and the play offs ,he was blighted by injuries to our best players and substance abusers but you were relieved when he left. He brought Done ,Adams and Brayford to the club ,all better than anything Adkins has done ,but hey ho Adkins 'seems a genuinely nice bloke' so that's ok then.
The more I think about the sacking of Clough I realise what a terrible decision it was.
 
I should think Brayford's better than anything Adkins has brought in, he cost 2 bloody million. But that's not to say he's been a good signing. Done's no more than average and we'll be lucky to recoup what we paid. The only genuinely good signing Clough made out of God knows how many was Adams. I wouldn't say that's any basis on which to say he shouldn't have been sacked.
 
The worrying thing is that NA has not really sorted the areas that we all know need sorting and we are less than 6 weeks from Xmas.
Murphy has not been replaced so we have no left winger,still need a keeper,still need at least 1 if not 2 CH's,and at least 1 CM.
Apart from Billy his signings have been poor and not improved the team at all and we are no better than this time last year.
Formations and personnel keep changing and it seems a bit chaotic really.
 
Approximately 65% were happy for Cloughie to be given another season and yet there seems to be more Blades now 'mightily relieved' when he was sacked.

Reminds me of how Chelsea used to average about 17,000 and yet the there are about 40,000 modern day Chelsea fans all saying they've been watching the club for the past 40 years.

Adkins is 'nice'. I am sick and tired of nice. David Weir seemed nice. Maybe we should have hung on to him. Mourinho, Ferguson don't appear 'nice' so I suppose if someone in their ilk should come along the we should them a wide berth.

Respect the effort you've put into the OP Woody but the telling time for Adkins is January. One trait a successful manager (in any industry) requires is 'decisiveness'. Adkins at present seems to want to keep everyone happy. I suppose that's what makes him 'nice'.

I still believe automatic is possible but it will be interesting to see the squad on January 30th when we play Bury.
 
Clough took over after the season when we were bottom of the league ,took us close to the play offs and a semi ,followed by another semi and the play offs ,he was blighted by injuries to our best players and substance abusers but you were relieved when he left. He brought Done ,Adams and Brayford to the club ,all better than anything Adkins has done ,but hey ho Adkins 'seems a genuinely nice bloke' so that's ok then.
The more I think about the sacking of Clough I realise what a terrible decision it was.

Agree with that about 99%. I believe he would have built his promotion squad in the summer and we would be flying now.

I do think he had probably fallen out with too many people and that's what cost him his job.
 



I don't think he's reviving Long's career out of the goodness of his heart or bc he's a Blade. Long made some really excellent saves against Fleetwood (from the highlights). If he can work on his confidence and command of his area he could be a very good keeper. This seemed to be in evidence on Satdi. The George Long I know doesn't venture much beyond his six yard box. I thought it was really telling against Worcester when he ventured out on to the left back position. It looked simple but it's something I can't ever remember him doing. His distribution is often quicker than Howard's as well - though he seems much more one-footed.

I'd guess Howard is (wrongly in more than one way) taking flak from the crowd as well - and that's affecting his confidence.

Reed I think (just a guess) has been assessed as not yet physically strong enough. He has obvious talents and I think will make it in the game somewhere - but maybe not yet at United if we want or get promotion.

DCL looked lightweight at Orient last season. His time at Northampton will be ideal - but he'll have to go some going to break into a promotion chasing first team. He'd have to be scoring better than a goal every two games and/or contributing in other ways to make a significant difference.




As regards Long WHF, it's nothing to do with sentiment when Adkins reintroduces Long, it's both sport and business.

Adkins sees Long in training every day and he knows the lad's commitment to his game. He has seen him in the various cups and must rate him at least close to Howard in form though with any young lad there can be setbacks if you pick them. The run of games from last Saturday will have been studied and the Walsall fixture next Saturday will have been taken into account.

No, the choice of Long is about a long term investment in the lad as a player and a business asset. Primarily if Long the player gets through the first handful of game and establishes himself as first choice then that can become another box ticked in Adkins' rebuild for years to come, a convenient, potentially big boost to the team, at the same time saving the club expenditure on a new keeper.

If all goes well over the next couple of seasons then Long can grow with the team and if he sees it through a promotion season then the club has a real asset on their hands. An asset in terms of competing in the Championship and an asset who would attract attention from the Premier League.

Long is a man now and he has to show he can man-up in order to realise his potential. These next few weeks are critical in his career as a professional and they are critical for us as a club in the wider context of promotion. Just a couple of good games can give him the boost in confidence that will see him on his way and Adkins will know by the JTW whether he can spend his budget elsewhere. Fact is Howard is destined to be an understudy if he plays even at this level for a big club.

No, it's not from the goodness of Adkins' heart, it's a bold and calculated risk....and risk it is in a promotion seeking club.
 
Agree with that about 99%. I believe he would have built his promotion squad in the summer and we would be flying now.

I do think he had probably fallen out with too many people and that's what cost him his job.
Why didn't he build his promotion squad before his second season instead of buy a mass amount of average s**t? You can't say that the board wasn't backing him seen as he spent 1.5 -2m on Brayford and was it 500k for Done?

Most mid table championship teams cost less than those 2, I think it was Bournemouth who played Man U in the cup last season and they compared the price of their starting line ups and I'm pretty sure Bournemouths team cost less that £1m.

All of this Clough would have us in the automatic spots is bolocks. Everyone was moaning about boring playing for the draw football. I know things aren't great right now but IMO Adkins is a much better manager than Clough.

Give Adkins time to clear out all s**t and the crocks then see where we are. At the end of the day hes been shafted with a team that is massively overrated by bookies and the media, who always assume we will walk the league because we SUFC. The truth is 60-70% of our is either s**t or an a**hole that only cares about their white Range Rover and getting pissed in town.
 
If all goes well over the next couple of seasons then Long can grow with the team and if he sees it through a promotion season then the club has a real asset on their hands. An asset in terms of competing in the Championship and an asset who would attract attention from the Premier League.

Then we can all moan when we sell him ;)
 
I don't think he's reviving Long's career out of the goodness of his heart or bc he's a Blade. Long made some really excellent saves against Fleetwood (from the highlights). If he can work on his confidence and command of his area he could be a very good keeper. This seemed to be in evidence on Satdi. The George Long I know doesn't venture much beyond his six yard box. I thought it was really telling against Worcester when he ventured out on to the left back position. It looked simple but it's something I can't ever remember him doing. His distribution is often quicker than Howard's as well - though he seems much more one-footed.

I'd guess Howard is (wrongly in more than one way) taking flak from the crowd as well - and that's affecting his confidence.

Reed I think (just a guess) has been assessed as not yet physically strong enough. He has obvious talents and I think will make it in the game somewhere - but maybe not yet at United if we want or get promotion.

DCL looked lightweight at Orient last season. His time at Northampton will be ideal - but he'll have to go some going to break into a promotion chasing first team. He'd have to be scoring better than a goal every two games and/or contributing in other ways to make a significant difference.


As regards Reed I don't think for one minute Adkins doesn't rate him very highly or thinks he is "too small".

Every young player needs individual treatment and encouragement. I suspect Adkins believes the "environment" as he calls it is not conducive to play Reed in. Maybe it tells us something about the lad who always seems the model of composure but has lost his way in a couple of games when the crowd have got at him.

Why the crowd should do that to such a young lad beggars belief but they do seem to have a low tolerance with him. Perhaps it's the fact the crowd don't think he's big enough which is the telling point at this stage.

Reed played blinders against Premier League teams, including v Newcastle for Adkins this season. His type of game is more suited to that level IMO and BTW my opinion is pure guesswork. In Reed's case I can only think of this reason not to play who I regard as our best midfield player now, never mind for years to come.

Big mistake by Adkins IMO but he has developed some top players in the past and knows the score.
 
Clough took over after the season when we were bottom of the league ,took us close to the play offs and a semi ,followed by another semi and the play offs ,he was blighted by injuries to our best players and substance abusers but you were relieved when he left. He brought Done ,Adams and Brayford to the club ,all better than anything Adkins has done ,but hey ho Adkins 'seems a genuinely nice bloke' so that's ok then.
The more I think about the sacking of Clough I realise what a terrible decision it was.


I think we can all be selective in remembering the good things Clough achieved sitwell. However, from a personal point of view and on reflection it was still the right decision.

Clough the man that said he wanted a first team squad of 18-19 players who then went on to bring in around 23 signings, most of which have proved to be a bunch of average Joes. The man who said how meticulous him and his staff are at identifying the right type of signings that will fit in at the club. Those who are not only suitable on the pitch, but will fit in well in the dressing room. Well, 20 odd players later and the binning off of Butler after a fortnight sort of contradicts that. Then of course, out of those 20 odd signings, how many were actually of the right calibre? Did the word "crock" not mean owt in his vocabulary?

Losing Harry, sacking off Butler and sending Collins in to the wilderness without replacing them was indeed a cardinal sin amounting to negligence in my book. His post match interviews, looking to blame someone at every given opportunity (remember the McNulty jokes? ) did nothing to endear him to the fan base

But above all that, I was sick to the back teeth of turning up to home games to watch was at best a boring game of footy from a home side desperate to pick up some 3 pointers and at worst was for the most part an absolute pile of shit. Basically, I was losing the will to live.

Adkins wasn't brought in because he 'seems a genuinely nice bloke' He was brought in because of his 3 promotions from div 3. Now, don't get me wrong, Adkins who I believe was the right appointment and the best qualified we could've hoped to get in respect of the position we find the club in, has a long way to go to convince me we are moving in the right direction.

Adkins has already made mistakes in my book. However, nothing has changed regards my stance that given the 19 months tenure that Clough got, we will see a team that will get results and along the way we'll get a modicum more in the way of entertainment than we got under Clough
 
Then we can all moan when we sell him ;)


I tried to put that into context in the O.P. and if we do sell him for big money then Adkins' decision last week will have been one of the best ever because without chances to play first team here Long is in danger of fading away to lower league football. If he is good enough he can recover from that but his value would be lost to us.

On the other hand we might keep him for many years if Long can grow in stature along with the club onwards and upwards.
 
Adkins is stuck with two indecisive keepers both of whom have suffered lapses in form more than once. We need a genuine number one. I don't see Longs selection as some plan for the future, more that Howard's decline looks to be continuing. Unless Longs form improves dramatically we need a commanding keeper. Not signing one will be a risk as you say because Adkins needs to be looking at NOW rather than maybe Long coming good for financial or other reasons in the future.
That plan didn't work when Warnock blew all the money on Shelton, Fathi etc, when we needed someone who could do a job then.
 
I tried to put that into context in the O.P. and if we do sell him for big money then Adkins' decision last week will have been one of the best ever because without chances to play first team here Long is in danger of fading away to lower league football. If he is good enough he can recover from that but his value would be lost to us.

On the other hand we might keep him for many years if Long can grow in stature along with the club onwards and upwards.
I got what you meant but you set me up to be a clever b*****d ;)

Theres not that much of a downside to playing Long at the minute seen as though Howard isn't performing. Hopefully Long sees it this way and grabs his chance by the scruff of the neck because I doubt he will get another one at UTD.
 
Agree with that about 99%. I believe he would have built his promotion squad in the summer and we would be flying now.

I do think he had probably fallen out with too many people and that's what cost him his job.
I agree keef this season was the season he was planning for and you could see the team taking shape two or three players moulded around last season's squad.It wouldn't have been exciting footy though happy to see games off winning. 1-0.Is that the reason he was sacked?.I don't think so a factor yes! But the board would have taken promotion if achieved that way.For me it was his outdated man management (Clough senior)plus his self indulgence regarding his employers.It seems he had total freedom to spend his budget and be answerable to no one,
You cannot get away with that today.
I supported Clough to the end as I had respect for his lifelong involvement. in the game.
He did take us to two semi finals and that was great and had the ability to win big games (tactics).
He left us with an unbalanced squad as I think the gaps would have been plugged in the summer.Adkins is trying to play progressive. football with a set of players who were being put together to play a more negative. way,not easy to achieve and maybe Adkins should have done it in a more transitional way.I am right behind him though, Clough is now history.
 
I agree keef this season was the season he was planning for and you could see the team taking shape two or three players moulded around last season's squad.It wouldn't have been exciting footy though happy to see games off winning. 1-0.Is that the reason he was sacked?.I don't think so a factor yes! But the board would have taken promotion if achieved that way.For me it was his outdated man management (Clough senior)plus his self indulgence regarding his employers.It seems he had total freedom to spend his budget and be answerable to no one,
You cannot get away with that today.
I supported Clough to the end as I had respect for his lifelong involvement. in the game.
He did take us to two semi finals and that was great and had the ability to win big games (tactics).
He left us with an unbalanced squad as I think the gaps would have been plugged in the summer.Adkins is trying to play progressive. football with a set of players who were being put together to play a more negative. way,not easy to achieve and maybe Adkins should have done it in a more transitional way.I am right behind him though, Clough is now history.
Brilliant post my thoughts exactly ,we were 4 players from a good side ,which I think would have been addressed in the summer.
 
Adkins' tenure thus far has been decidely mediocre and a real disappointment given all the pre-season optimism. I can imagine him now preparing his post-match interview script for when we get trounced by Walsall. Then we'll have another all too familiar 'meltdown' post-mortem thread, etc, etc.
 
Brilliant post my thoughts exactly ,we were 4 players from a good side ,which I think would have been addressed in the summer.

We have arguably been 4 players from a good side 2 close seasons running - and both managers (and the same board) have done very poor transfer business.
 
Mourinho, Ferguson don't appear 'nice' so I suppose if someone in their ilk should come along the we should them a wide berth.

Steve Evans when the inevitable happens at Leeds?
 
Last edited:



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom