I don't quite get the anti Parkinson thing. I'm in a tiny minority on here, I appreciate.
He's got a better CV than Clough and is more adaptable in his style. He plays some long ball stuff with Bradford, but that could well be to do with having no resource at all, and playing to the strengths of what he has. He's done a fantastic job at Bradford.
Though I wouldn't have fired Clough (yet) for him, I'm not nearly as negative as many on here. It didn't seem so lonely chatting in the pub last night, with a fair few more positive about him.
Another name that cropped up regularly was Steve Evans - though as popular as a fart in a lift on here.
UTB
Alco - I understand your sentiments. Clough had started something and although he had issues, the continual changing of managers is just not good. We now have the same reputation the pigs had from 1997 onwards when they kept trying different people - with very little success.
As for Parkinson - he is nothing more than average, similar to Danny Wilson. I frankly couldn't give a monkeys about DW playing/managing the pigs - his record with previous clubs was not good, apart from Barnsley first time round. Parkinson is with Bradford for a reason and does not seem to have anything other to offer than same old, same old. We might get a change of football philosophy when we can't really afford one.
Whatever the reasons for Cloughs departure could set us back not only two years with the next manager, but the one after that as well.
Ideally we need a manger who can actually make the players we have, better. We need more from Harris, Scoogal, Mcnulty, Murphy, Flynn et al and to do that we need the right sort of manager.
Parkinson, might succeed - but he just doesn't seem to have that "little bit extra", not that we deserve it, but we need it - and we need it badly now.
Parkinson would be an average punt in the dark - is that what we have now become?
UTB