This is unquestionably true, but to counter that, we also need to be able to hold the police accountable, above and beyond how we might judge other civilians. They are human, with the same failings and lack of self-control/discipline/etc as the rest of us. They are handed power, trust and responsibilities that demand we hold them to a higher degree of scrutiny than (almost) anyone else in society.
I wrote on here before the game and said I was surprised at the level of policing and the pre-match warnings. I hadn't cottoned on to anything before the game that suggested this fixture needed an army to police it. It seems there was surprise all around when the warnings went up on Friday, besides, does it even need to be pointed out that disorder won't be tolerated? I think that's a given!

Both sets of supporters seem to be in agreement that Saturday was a massive overreaction and completely unnecessary. The cynic in me wonders if there was some mutual overtime back-slapping going off and if SY police were at Sunderland yesterday?
I think it is right that we (football supporters across divides) should be asking these sorts of questions. Being concerned at the levels and methods of policing (and ultimately, a loss of your civil liberties!) does not equate to being anti-police.