Oh. Who you suggesting then. Thought that’s what you were after.
Shall we get a young Spanish manager in that plays a different way with little to no experience of championship football?
Go on, who’s the mouth watering new manager to change things up
Spot on
SwissBlade
So many of the Wilder detractors argument is that they want change, any change is a good thing, and it’s always because they have an inherent dislike of the man and evidently display no realisation, no acknowledgement whatsoever of where we were before he came in and where we are now.
They spout endless bollocks about a DoF and a “tactically aware” young coach or manager with absolutely no recognition that the coaching and training infrastructure is no where near what is needed for that type of set up. Even if they do give a cursory nod to the backroom staff required it’s as though that can be magically in place in a nanosecond and a new coach in place to bring on the nirvana of all appointments.
They spout about the rest of us settling for a mid table championship team and them being so much more progressive and wanting to compete and impress in the top league. No one iota of cognisance that without a level of investment unprecedented in Sheffield United history that pipe dream sits in a bin of delusional unreality matched only by our near neighbours spendageddon mentality (evidently without the infrastructure investment too).
Where I do agree on the progress front is that the owners should (if they have any level of ambition for this club) get the infrastructure right (cat 1 academy is the very start of that) as a foundation.
Where I differ significantly is that they seem to fail to understand that without that (huge level of investment and a programme that will take a minimum of 3 years) no DoF and head coach combo will make any positive contribution whatsoever. In fact we have witnessed first hand what that naive level of thinking results, and it isn’t pretty.
We are not a club set up for a continental style management and coaching programme. We are a provincial, working class, inner city team that represents its roots and values and mirrors the tribal nature of its heritage. Whilst not winning owt for over 100 years I believe that is the pinnacle of what we can achieve within our present budget. And I’m fine with that. Owning the city and laughing at that other lot is an ok default position. The odd promotion and foray into the top league is as good as it gets for us. And I’m fine with that at the moment.
What’s the alternative outcome?
Cleverly run but ultimately insipid and nondescript clubs like Brentford, Bournemouth and Brighton?
Have a go spunkathon clubs like Forest?
Cheating clubs like Leicester or Wham?
Strikes me the analogous performance to aspire to are clubs like Palace, Leeds, or Sunderland (if we have their level of investment), or Wolves (see where they are now) who sustained a top flight place for quite a long time.
The main thing I laugh at with these types of threads is the ridiculousness of the expectation that just a DOF and a trendy coach will be the panacea in an instant.
Bonkers.