CONFIRMED Kieffer Moore signs on a 3-year deal

[Bladezz]

Be a very good signing for us!

 

[Blade56]

He’s one of those players that should have joined us much sooner but it just never happened. Think he will do a much better job than McBambi legs.

 

[SUFCinks]

Big donkey, effective at hoof/basic football but no feet. Hate this type of player. Just a lump upfront to launch it to. I’d rather stick with Mcburnie as he can link play better and can play to feet.

 

[Berkshire Blade]

Big donkey, effective at hoof/basic football but no feet. Hate this type of player. Just a lump upfront to launch it to. I’d rather stick with Mcburnie as he can link play better and can play to feet.

In my opinion every side needs exactly this type of player.

 

[Bladezz]

Him and Mcburnie and let’s play like Stoke.

 

[Booker4]

I'm pleased to see us linked with Moore. Liked him for a few years now. If he does come I do t think it means Mcburnie is necessarily off but he could be in competition with Mcburnie for the bigger man role.

Those bit that keen should remember how big a contribution Madine did for us.

 

[SUFCinks]

In my opinion every side needs exactly this type of player.

We have Mcburnie (contract pending) who gives us this. Mcburnie can also play on the deck as well.

 

[Frank the tank]

Big donkey, effective at hoof/basic football but no feet. Hate this type of player. Just a lump upfront to launch it to. I’d rather stick with Mcburnie as he can link play better and can play to feet.

Always been quite Impressed with moores technical ability and mobility whenever I've seen him unless he has rapidly declined from when I last saw him

Don't think he was very effective for Ipswich last season the games seem to pass him by a bit but I always thought his strength was linking play

 

[CaptainMorgans]

We have Mcburnie (contract pending) who gives us this. Mcburnie can also play on the deck as well.

McBurnie hasn't signed.
Moore did really well for Ipswich, helped get their promotion over the line. I'd take it.

 

[Jimmy Fleck]

We need options- especially in the championship. I’d take Moore 100%.

 

[Broomhall Blade]

In my opinion every side needs exactly this type of player.

Thats where Man City are going wrong better let Pep know.

 

[Booker4]

There's something awfully familiar with the song?! Takes a pretty good pen too!

 

[SUFCinks]

McBurnie hasn't signed.
Moore did really well for Ipswich, helped get their promotion over the line. I'd take it.

Not a player that you will ever convince me to want. I do understand why people would want him though as he is effective in the air and productive with goals. Personally I would like us to progress away from the style of play that he thrives off. This would drag us back towards our old industrious hoofball style.

 

[bonobo]

Moore is a better footballer than McBurnie, less inspired, but technically better and more consistent. Seems like a far better attitude as well.

 

[Berkshire Blade]

We have Mcburnie (contract pending) who gives us this. Mcburnie can also play on the deck as well.

We don't

 

[Frank the tank]

Erling Haaland says hi

Thats where Man City are going wrong better let Pep know.

 

[Berkshire Blade]

Thats where Man City are going wrong better let Pep know.

They had years without a traditional big man.

Then they signed haaland who isn't a very pep style player. They already know.

 

[Yogi]

He’s a very capable plan b type player I’d be happy with this if it’s true.

 

[ancientblade]

i rate moore at championship level and think hes better on the deck than people give him credit for for me he would be a good signing and wouldnt suprise me if it was a double deal from bournemouth with david brooks

 

[Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou]

Guarantees you double figures at championship level and good in both boxes

 

[Broomhall Blade]

They had years without a traditional big man.

Then they signed haaland who isn't a very pep style player. They already know.

They signed Haaland because he was the best striker around at the time not because of his size.
I don't think I have ever seen Man City hoof it up front or just launch it.

Just out of interest how many Premiership clubs did you see last season hoofing it or just launching it up front other than us of course ?

 

[Berkshire Blade]

They signed Haaland because he was the best striker around at the time not because of his size.
I don't think I have ever seen Man City hoof it up front or just launch it.

Just out of interest how many Premiership clubs did you see last season hoofing it or just launching it up front other than us of course ?

Quite a few. It's re branded as long distance passing now. Liverpool and man city keepers particularly good at it

And if you don't think a part of haalands success is down to his size then...well.

 

[Rifleman ITK]

 

[Frank the tank]

They signed Haaland because he was the best striker around at the time not because of his size.
I don't think I have ever seen Man City hoof it up front or just launch it.

Just out of interest how many Premiership clubs did you see last season hoofing it or just launching it up front other than us of course ?

You keep doing you ya little nonsense peddler

 

[Bergen Blade]

We do need some strength, aerial ability and experience to complement the young lads we currently have up front.

 

[Bookers Mullet]

Good player to have on the bench and does give options, however I'd be worried if he was a starter

 

[The Crab]

McBurnie hasn't signed.
Moore did really well for Ipswich, helped get their promotion over the line. I'd take it.

And even if he does sign, with his fitness record we’d need another option

 

[CoatesyBlade]

Would take Moore all day long! Get the video done!

 

[SUFCinks]

Comparing Moore to Haaland is up there with one of the wildest things i’ve read on here. They are both tall strikers and good in the air but thats where the comparison finishes.

 

[Belvedere Blade]