Given the debate that we've had over recent years about the success or otherwise of the Academy, I thought that the article on the main site was very interesting: -
To me this is tangible evidence that the Academy works and that it doesn't get the recognition that it deserves.
"The auditors gave us special praise for our player productivity over the years. The Premier League's scoring system sees us ranked as the eighth best producer of talent in the last three years.
"We haven't been ranked outside the top 20 in the last 12 years; this is what sets us aside from other clubs. To me this is more important than the categorisation, it takes years to build a reputation for player development like this, it doesn't happen overnight.
"The challenge now is to continue to improve the programme we deliver because we want to not just because we are told we have to."
Read more at http://www.sufc.co.uk/news/article/20130704-academy-recognition-895595.aspx#30gEg5hjK01RwADF.99
"We haven't been ranked outside the top 20 in the last 12 years; this is what sets us aside from other clubs. To me this is more important than the categorisation, it takes years to build a reputation for player development like this, it doesn't happen overnight.
"The challenge now is to continue to improve the programme we deliver because we want to not just because we are told we have to."
Read more at http://www.sufc.co.uk/news/article/20130704-academy-recognition-895595.aspx#30gEg5hjK01RwADF.99
To me this is tangible evidence that the Academy works and that it doesn't get the recognition that it deserves.