End of the day, you can't help the way you feel.
I've posted many messages on here to give him a chance and not to judge on his overall management record. Got some achievement at Barnsley, had a limited spell at Leeds with no window and at Hibs there was some good and bad.
I don't want United to become a Watford or a Chelsea the way they hire and fire.
This past week or so though has done him some damage.
From defending him to an initial degree the last two or three games he has shown shortcomings which have undermined the ability of the players he has.
I've seen blips before around this time of year. Usually never exceed 4 games. It's 6 games now, which equates to almost 40% of the season. This can't be dismissed as just a blip.
It's also confusing when managers make comments firstly that contradict others they have made and secondly when they steadfastly refuse to admit when they make a mistake. As a Yorkshireman too he must know people appreciate when folk put their hand up and admit they got it wrong.
Taking purely the subset of the last two, which were already on the back of 4 games without a win:
Coming into Coventry, he'd told us that McBurnie couldn't play more than 70 minutes, sewing the seeds for in game changes or rotation.
Against a supposed lesser team in Coventry, he makes no rotational change at all. Despite Basham having a poor game against Blackpool he stays in, also despite Robinson being back and potentially needing minutes. Despite N'Diaye playing many minutes and McBurnie having an issue they both stay in. Despite his apparent concern, he plays both of them for the full 90. He also leaves Brewster, Khadra and Sharp except the last 2 mins on the bench. His excuse for overplaying McBurnie was there he had an effort about the time he should have been removed due to medical caution. So he kept him on. Not much concern on player welfare there. Then he had the arrogance and temerity to suggest he massively disagrees that we didn't go for it and didn't buy that we should have made changes.
Next up Norwich in possibly our biggest game of the season and having taken little care to manage the minutes, he goes all Mother Theresa on us and drops both top scorers under the guise of looking after their welfare.
Then he's also doubling down on his team selection being correct, despite posing little actual threat on the Norwich goal in the first half irregardless of heavy possession. He can thank Teemu Pukki. If he'd not missed, few would be buying a second half rally from the players he should have picked and there would be far more intense focus on his ineffectual record post-break.
So which one is it Paul? Because if player welfare is a big thing for you then we should be seeing 5 subs used all the time and the odd player rotated.
You fucked up the line up yesterday. Part of that could have been because you fucked up the game management from the prior match.
Don't try to hoodwink us. Be honest.
Better management of the team and we should have been sat here with 6 from the last two and be top. Norwich were nothing yesterday. We gifted them a start and they lucked out a bit with the ball falling as it did to Pukki but they failed to impose themselves at all aside from a 10 minute spell. Coventry were even worse. They didn't manage an effort on target for 70 minutes so what fear we had of throwing the kitchen sink at them I've no idea.
Back to the OP. You can't help the way you feel. From someone who was open to him, he's definitely gone down in my estimation through both action and word this past week or so.
For all the feeling of windup from @Fallowfied 's post, there is some truth. We've 30 games left in the season. Out of Hecky, Dyche, Wilder or other, is Hecky the most likely to get the maximum out of those games? I hope he is. But he's got to improve a helluva lot.
We need 2 points per game to go up automatically. We had that and a buffer of 3 before the break. Incidentally, where was the resting and player welfare in giving Berge a break after two back to back 90s or Norrington-Davies? Both now injured. I digress. To get back to 2 per game we would need to win the next 6 matches, or it's play offs and after the start we've had, playoffs would be a massive underachievement especially when you look at who might finish above us. He's even let back in Watford into the mix when their start should have jinxed them already.
If he's to retain our support I feel he owes us and so does the team. We've 5 matches left before the break, he needs to be nailing as close to maximum points as possible. No more fucking about. He's got Anel back. He's got Robinson back. He's got Baldock. He's got Fleck, Doyle and Norwood as options and he's got all his strikers more or less available. No more excuses.
Got to West Brom, take the game to them and actually get a result. Bristol same, don't be as shit as we were last time down there. Put in a proper home performance against Burnley and out an actual competitor to the sword, you've failed to do there so far against Norwich, Watford, QPR and West Brom in the cup so far. Dismiss Rotherham as a newly promoted team should be by one hoping to go up. More of the same against an unpredictable Cardiff.
We simply can't waste this golden opportunity by being crap and being poorly managed or another 10 year cycle of nothingness shall begin. Mass exodus in the summer, young players being blooded and a mid table finish. That's what we'll be subjected to.
Hopefully he can grasp the opportunity, but if he can't then we can't wait another 10 years because he wasn't up to it.