SLB
Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2016
- Messages
- 757
- Reaction score
- 1,693
- Thread starter
- #61
Difficult question to answer. Think the decision to build the South Stand was made at the wrong time. It was thought in 1972 that the South Stand would cost £650,000 and it would take a year to build and that itr would be ready for the 1974-75 season.
View attachment 107421
Then there were problems in getting the stand built within the timescale and the costs had risen to a lot more than £650,000. The board wasnt expecting the average crowds to drop by 10,000 (33,000 in 1971-72 and 23,000 in 1972-73). In summer 1973 the board offered a contract to TC with the promise to sign players to build a team round him and TC was happy to sign the contract despite that Man U were trying to sign him. I would say that the Blades fans were still happy with John Harris being our manager and it was a surprise that the board decided to move him "upstairs" in December and appoint a "track suit" manager in Ken Furphy. I was only 11 at the time and wanted to know my dad's thoughts on this rather than forming my own opinion. He seemed ok with the decision as we moved into a new era but I noticed throughout the 1973-74 season that the builders were very slow in getting the South Stand ready. I think in the last home game of the 1973-74 season (v QPR- same day as Wendy lost 8-0 at Boro) I was still expecting the stand to be ready for August 1974. I think most fans were ok about Furphy (apart from some booing Keith Eddy who took the penalty in the 2-2 home draw against Spurs because Woodward was expected to take it).
It was a shock when we sold Geoff Salmons to Stoke for £180,000 in summer 1974 (TC was angry with the sale because of the board's promise to him in the previous summer). The board told the media that we had to accept Stoke's offer because of the rising debts in building the South Stand. Not Furphy's fault but the fans werent really happy with Furphy's signings (apart from Jim Brown who was decent). It was a surprise that the team finished as high as 6th for the 1974-75 season so we all were looking forward to the 1975-76 season. Furphy wanted to sign Francis Lee from Derby but the board said "No". Furphy then made an offer to Southend for Chris Guthrie but it was rejected by the board. Our chairman, John Hassall, then agreed to pay Southend the asking price despite that Furphy thought it was above valuation.
Results didnt come to our way in the first 11 games of the 1975-76 season and Furphy was sacked. I was in my 3rd year at my boarding school and didnt really know what I really thought of the sacking when I found out in the papers in the next morning. By coincidence that morning my dad had driven down a pupil from Chesterfield (think she had been attending her grandmother's or grandfather's funeral in the previous day and her parents paid the travel costs to my dad) to my school and I had bumped to him near the school entrance with him holding a newspaper wanting to see if I knew about the sacking. I told him that I did but wondered what he thought of it. He said that it was a good decision and he was now more confident of us beating the drop!
Now to answer your question "was it the right decision?". I thought Furphy was unlucky in some ways but at the same time we needed someone to stop the rot but Jimmy Sirrel wasnt the ideal replacement despite that my dad thought at the time that he was a good appointment!
Good informative post SB. I was 18 at the time and that is how I remember it in the main but you've filled in some blanks for my unreliable memory.
