Ron_Justice
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2014
- Messages
- 1,619
- Reaction score
- 3,566
A thought l had during one of the final 3 games this season. Who's the direct cover for Bash? Unless I'm mistaken (probable), whenever the need to replace Bash has arisen, we've shuffled formation to the 4-4-2. I can't think who in the current squad can come in and play the RCB in the 3-5-2.
As much as we need cover in several positions, i'm not seeing any discussion around competition / a replacement for Bash. Obviously he doesn't really need either of those things, if he can stay fit, but if we lose him to injury, as we stand, we're fucked. It doesn't seem to be a subject / position that's being focused on, by us lot at least, and discussed. .
Anyone got any names of players able to do the job Bash does? I don't mean decent CB's that are solid and 'a name'. l mean a made to measure replacement that would fit straight in.
As much as we need cover in several positions, i'm not seeing any discussion around competition / a replacement for Bash. Obviously he doesn't really need either of those things, if he can stay fit, but if we lose him to injury, as we stand, we're fucked. It doesn't seem to be a subject / position that's being focused on, by us lot at least, and discussed. .
Anyone got any names of players able to do the job Bash does? I don't mean decent CB's that are solid and 'a name'. l mean a made to measure replacement that would fit straight in.