McCabe interview in The Times (says he'll sue Sheffield United)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 1486
  • Start date Start date

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

He only has interest in himself not the club....nothing lasts for ever Kev, and while ever your spouting about it it makes the atmosphere toxic....

Let’s just hope the courts don’t allow an appeal.
 

Mate, I have spent about ten years on here and other boards suggesting this to anyone who would listen, only to be shouted down by McCabe's own fanclub who reckon golden beams of warm sunshine pour from his balloon knot. They also try to allude that attending each game would have crystalised that negative viewpoint into one of more enlightenment or that simply seeing 'how much money he has put in' spells out his true worth (whilst players like Jamie Murphy fuck off to Brighton for 'undisclosed' leaving us robbed of the previous season's top goalscorer and painfully thin in the talent department ... just after he'd signed a fucking contract. Apparently his sale didn't pay for the pitch, it paid for the remaining players wages - people like Sammon and Woolford)

Believe me, I tried. I even (brace yourselves) attended games when I could. But watching us scrape a draw against Crawley (for example) didn't tell me we were preparing ourselves or Europe in a few years or that any 'Game Changing Investments' were inbound. Managers suddenly fucking off for no real reason but a possible welching on team strengthening requirements and promises told me all I needed to know. And if Adkins couldn't do fuck all with what Wilder could do ... with some added input with investments HE wanted, then post Gillingham away in the 2016-17 season we lose only three league games and stomp the division flat. Fuck all to do with McCabe save for him knowing he'd landed a doozie with CWAK and needed to give him what he wanted to hang onto him. The rest, up to eighth in the Premier League, is history ... hardly any of which belongs to McCabe.

pommpey

Maybe, just maybe, the truth is in the middle and those who "shouted [you] down" were actually just people with a different viewpoint. I don't think that "warm sunshine pours from his balloon knot" but I equally don't think he deserves some of the criticism he gets.

McCabe made some awful decisions - nearly all of them revolved around who was in the manager's office. I don't doubt that there was a healthy amount of belief that his way was the best way but that's to be expected with a self-made millionaire.

That said, on the property side of things he's turned the Lane into a much better stadium and the Desso pitch you derided so frequently was pretty useful to Wilder's swashbuckling League One winners: I remember a games at Rochdale and Oldham on pitches which would have been better for rugby where we scraped draws against terrible sides.

As for managers "suddenly fucking off"...don't make me laugh. Under McCabe:

Adrian Heath (1999): deservedly sacked. Was terrible
Neil Warnock (2007): resigned after relegating us despite being 7 points clear of relegation with 8 games left of the PL season
Bryan Robson (2008): sacked after leading the best paid Championship squad we've ever had to the heady heights of midtable and describing the Derby as "just another game"
Kevin Blackwell (2010): sacked after a 3-0 home defeat to Neil Warnock's QPR. Race had run after we limped to a 9th place finish the season before; his tendered resignation after the 2009 play off final should have been accepted.
Gary Speed (2010): resigned to take the Wales job
Micky Adams (2011): sacked after relegation to the third tier. Truly awful manager.
Danny Wilson (2013): sacked as we stalled in the final laps of his second season.
David Weir (2013): sacked as it became clear he was well out of his depth
Nigel Clough (2015): resigned after the Board refused to sign another load of his crocks (Jake Buxton IIRC)
Nigel Adkins (2016): sacked after leading us to our worst finish in 30 years

You could question the appointment of almost all of those but they were all backed in terms of playing staff budget. Including Wilder - we lost £5.5m in the L1 promotion season (split between McCabe and Prince Abdullah).

Final point: he really, really should accept the Court's judgment and let it go. It's over Kev, enjoy the Premier League.
 
As for managers "suddenly fucking off"...don't make me laugh. Under McCabe:

Adrian Heath (1999): deservedly sacked. Was terrible
Neil Warnock (2007): resigned after relegating us despite being 7 points clear of relegation with 8 games left of the PL season
Bryan Robson (2008): sacked after leading the best paid Championship squad we've ever had to the heady heights of midtable and describing the Derby as "just another game"
Kevin Blackwell (2010): sacked after a 3-0 home defeat to Neil Warnock's QPR. Race had run after we limped to a 9th place finish the season before; his tendered resignation after the 2009 play off final should have been accepted.
Gary Speed (2010): resigned to take the Wales job
Micky Adams (2011): sacked after relegation to the third tier. Truly awful manager.
Danny Wilson (2013): sacked as we stalled in the final laps of his second season.
David Weir (2013): sacked as it became clear he was well out of his depth
Nigel Clough (2015): resigned after the Board refused to sign another load of his crocks (Jake Buxton IIRC)
Nigel Adkins (2016): sacked after leading us to our worst finish in 30 years

You could question the appointment of almost all of those but they were all backed in terms of playing staff budget. Including Wilder - we lost £5.5m in the L1 promotion season (split between McCabe and Prince Abdullah).

Final point: he really, really should accept the Court's judgment and let it go. It's over Kev, enjoy the Premier League.
Who appointed those (mostly) hopeless managers?
 
Who appointed those (mostly) hopeless managers?

In case you missed it.

McCabe made some awful decisions - nearly all of them revolved around who was in the manager's office.
...
You could question the appointment of almost all of those [managers]

Final point: he really, really should accept the Court's judgment and let it go. It's over Kev, enjoy the Premier League.
 
I respect the time , effort, and undoubtedly money that Kev has put into our club
You compare our team , stadium and standing in the football league at present
It’s head and shoulders above that other shower of disbelievers in S6
But Kev , your served our club well ( yes he’s made absolutely mind boggling decisions) has undoubtedly taken a good wage / cut out of any dealings it may have had or done
But please Kev let it go mate , don’t let your reputation be tarnished by greed
At the expense of our club which you undoubtedly love just to get a few bob more
Thanks for your time Kev but bow out graciously and with a bit of dignity ehh
UTB
 
I thought that mcabe and the prince had to agree a price for the club and if they couldn't the courts will name a price so how can he say he wants 50 million or he'll sue?
More McCabe bollox!
 
So the Ownership affair might be settled by a refusal by the CoA to grant PTA.

Or much later if an Appeal actually gets off the ground.

Oh dear , Kevin - if Mr Winter's article is accurate , there are so many inconsistencies in what you say.

If you thought the compensation from WHU should be £50m and you had a fiduciary duty to SUFC , why accept £21m ?

If you are truly the sympathetic type , who can give up £29m of SUFC's cash , why can't you give up some of your own ?

QUOTE - “We’ve still not been paid for the real estate,” McCabe adds, “and will have to sue Sheffield United next year if they don’t pay for property. And we don’t want to do that.
Why mention it then ? You are clearly emotionally conflicted over this subject. The readers can't help you - go and get some counselling.

QUOTE - The loss of the opportunity to hand on the club to his sons, Simon and Scott, does not actually worry him. “No, it’s too big a headache.
It's public knowledge that your sons didn't want the Club.
Which is why , in order to retire , you've wanted to sell the Club since way before 2013.

QUOTE - McCabe is determined to fight Prince Abdullah for control of Sheffield United. “The club’s under the wrong ownership. He’s put a 22-year-old in charge as chairman, his son-in-law
But Kevin , you didn't want control of SUFC , because you wanted to sell it and retire.
or have your sons changed their minds since promotion ?
Bit late for that - you rolled the dice in January 2018. And the Prince saw something good in Wilder , something worth a £5m punt.
And the £24m property the Club couldn't afford in 2018 has now become the £50m property which it can afford.

So he started off trying to pull a fast one over the property and then got lucky with getting to the Prem.
But you've got lucky too , Kevin - your £24m has , according to what you say in this article , become £50m !
So that's not bad , is it ?

After all , it was you that brought in the Prince and signed the Shareholders Agreement.

You now look like someone who can't stomach the consequences of his own actions.
This didn't cut any ice with the High Court - why do you think the CoA is more likely to be swayed by your protestations of "love for the Club" ?
Especially when you are talking to the media about suing the Club , for a debt that's not due till July 2020.

QUOTE - I don’t bear any hostility to Abdullah. I can still talk to him now, he has good humour, loves football and he does watch Sheffield United but mainly on screen.”
and later :
McCabe won’t be there watching Wilder’s team today. “Sheffield United won’t give me tickets. That’s who we’re dealing with.
And then :
I’ll be playing (squash) on Friday thinking that ball is Abdullah’s head !

Kevin , Kevin , Kevin ,
Your arguments are based on a lifetime of emotional attachment to the club and the cash you have poured in over the last 2 decades.
But that is not what the CoA will consider.
They will look at what you did in January 2018 , which you KNEW would give the Prince the chance of buying the Club for £5m.

Please , please , please ,
Don't let your lawyers waste more of your money.
Don't leave the Club's ownership (even theoretically) uncertain.
Accept a tidy sum for your property.
Resolve your differences with the Prince.
Tell the fans that you will stop making waves and allow the Club to move forward and build its reputation.
Receive the plaudits you deserve for your long & generous custodianship.
Accept some sort of honourary title and get lifelong access to the Director's Box with your grandson.
 
I thought that mcabe and the prince had to agree a price for the club and if they couldn't the courts will name a price so how can he say he wants 50 million or he'll sue?
More McCabe bollox!
You really do have a good grip on the situation don't you.

The court has ordered the Prince to pay a commercial valuation for the properties, anticipated to be in the region of £50m.

McCabe has allegedly said (this is a newspaper report after all so it doesn't mean that it's either true or accurately reported) that if the Prince doesn't pay what the court has ordered him to then he will sue.

I'm struggling to see why anybody is getting the least bit wound up by any of this.
 
I respect the time , effort, and undoubtedly money that Kev has put into our club
You compare our team , stadium and standing in the football league at present
It’s head and shoulders above that other shower of disbelievers in S6
But Kev , your served our club well ( yes he’s made absolutely mind boggling decisions) has undoubtedly taken a good wage / cut out of any dealings it may have had or done
But please Kev let it go mate , don’t let your reputation be tarnished by greed
At the expense of our club which you undoubtedly love just to get a few bob more
Thanks for your time Kev but bow out graciously and with a bit of dignity ehh
UTB


He’s never taken a wage from the club.
 
You really do have a good grip on the situation don't you.

The court has ordered the Prince to pay a commercial valuation for the properties, anticipated to be in the region of £50m.

McCabe has allegedly said (this is a newspaper report after all so it doesn't mean that it's either true or accurately reported) that if the Prince doesn't pay what the court has ordered him to then he will sue.

I'm struggling to see why anybody is getting the least bit wound up by any of this.
Because :
1. In relation to the ownership , McCabe's appeal will prolong our frustrating period of uncertainty ; and
2. In relation to the sale of his real estate , the obligation to purchase falls upon the Club/SUFC , not upon the Prince - so every extra £1 to McCabe is a £1 out of the Club , which it then can't spend on players or ground improvements. McCabe must find this situation quite conflicting - emotions v finances - but he (and only he) became the author of it when he split the real estate from the Club.

So for the above 2 reasons , he is now inevitably in the role of villain.

But the solution is within his gift + is so easy , if his pride would allow his love for the Club to trump his finances.

His happiness & his PR would be best served by stating :
1. The interests of the Club are paramount.
2. Therefore , although the decision hurt me , I will not appeal it , for the sake of the Club's stability
 
Because :
1. In relation to the ownership , McCabe's appeal will prolong our frustrating period of uncertainty ; and
2. In relation to the sale of his real estate , the obligation to purchase falls upon the Club/SUFC , not upon the Prince - so every extra £1 to McCabe is a £1 out of the Club , which it then can't spend on players or ground improvements. McCabe must find this situation quite conflicting - emotions v finances - but he (and only he) became the author of it when he split the real estate from the Club.

So for the above 2 reasons , he is now inevitably in the role of villain.

But the solution is within his gift + is so easy , if his pride would allow his love for the Club to trump his finances.

His happiness & his PR would be best served by stating :
1. The interests of the Club are paramount.
2. Therefore , although the decision hurt me , I will not appeal it , for the sake of the Club's stability


The Prince could do what McCabe did and put his own money in to buy the assets.

Your assumption means that the club finances the purchase via PL money alone. Something many have Understandable concerns about.

That, however, is the Princes decision. How anyone can blame McCabe for that is a mystery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dkc
A car crash interview by Kevin, he is starting to remind of one of those criminals you see in American true life crime movies who have read a couple of books on the law whilst waiting for trial and think they are smart enough to represent themselves in court.. and then go on to make absolute tits of themselves
 
A car crash interview by Kevin, he is starting to remind of one of those criminals you see in American true life crime movies who have read a couple of books on the law whilst waiting for trial and think they are smart enough to represent themselves in court.. and then go on to make absolute tits of themselves


I wonder if he’s changed legal advisors? You’d think whether he has or not, they’d advise him against this sort of thing.
 

Those ‘Sheffield slag’ phrases he comes out with infuriate me. I’ve met this man a number of times on a business prospective and once on a social event, he’s extremely difficult and knows the art of manipulation ridiculously well.

After the first meeting I said to my boss “I can see why we’ve had so many managers at Bramall Lane”.

Yes we have to be thankful for what he’s done, and il be honest he does a lot of charity work. In the charity events he held at Christmas I never saw the prince or any representation (they could have been there but they wasn’t on or announced on stage at any point)

From a football prospective he didn’t want us to sign Mousett, McBurnie because he’d rather have cash in the bank. I’m glad his reign has come to an end.

He knew how to dismiss & manipulate us fans. Told us what we wanted to hear constantly yet never produced.
 
Because :
1. In relation to the ownership , McCabe's appeal will prolong our frustrating period of uncertainty ; and
2. In relation to the sale of his real estate , the obligation to purchase falls upon the Club/SUFC , not upon the Prince - so every extra £1 to McCabe is a £1 out of the Club , which it then can't spend on players or ground improvements. McCabe must find this situation quite conflicting - emotions v finances - but he (and only he) became the author of it when he split the real estate from the Club.

So for the above 2 reasons , he is now inevitably in the role of villain.

But the solution is within his gift + is so easy , if his pride would allow his love for the Club to trump his finances.

His happiness & his PR would be best served by stating :
1. The interests of the Club are paramount.
2. Therefore , although the decision hurt me , I will not appeal it , for the sake of the Club's stability
All fair enough but are you suggesting that he "donates" the properties to the club?

I agree about the appeal but the comment about suing the club, which is the thread title, if he doesn't get paid may be ill advised but it's perfectly understandable.

In his shoes I'd do the same.
 
There are some aspects to that interview that are an embarrassment to McCabe and maybe he needs some PR advice before agreeing to do these types of articles.

However for those coming out with the old cliches of 'let it go' and 'move on Kev' I know if I was in his position I would find it very difficult to just let it go and move on.
 
maybe he needs some PR advice before agreeing to do these types of articles.

I think Kevin only takes advice from person, himself.

I also don’t for one minute believe he would have sold up to those Americans, I don’t believe he would have willingly given up control of United to anyone.
 
The Prince could do what McCabe did and put his own money in to buy the assets.

Your assumption means that the club finances the purchase via PL money alone. Something many have Understandable concerns about.

That, however, is the Princes decision. How anyone can blame McCabe for that is a mystery.
I hit the post button too early by accident.
The 3rd thing McCabe should say is :
3. A fair price will be set for my real estate which balances the interests of my family with those of the Club.

If he spoke this way , instead of talking about appeals & suing the Club , his reputation as benefactor might remain intact.

But if he carries on in the present vein , all his years of generosity will be forgotten and he'll be remembered as greedy to the end , no matter what damage he caused the Club just as it tried to hang onto a place in the Prem.

He really has no PR skills.

On the point of where the Club gets the money to buy his real estate in July 2020 , no one can answer that , so in a sense it's not worth discussing.

Certainly there's no question of blaming McCabe for whatever source of finance the Prince ultimately chooses.

But McCabe can't get around the fact that he will potentially be in the same position with SUFC , as he was in 2007 with WHU.

If the Club can't afford his real estate , having been relegated , he might be in a position of putting the Club out of business.

We'll have to hope that he accords to SUFC the same amount of sympathy which he gave to WHU in 2007 !
 
I hit the post button too early by accident.
The 3rd thing McCabe should say is :
3. A fair price will be set for my real estate which balances the interests of my family with those of the Club.

If he spoke this way , instead of talking about appeals & suing the Club , his reputation as benefactor might remain intact.

But if he carries on in the present vein , all his years of generosity will be forgotten and he'll be remembered as greedy to the end , no matter what damage he caused the Club just as it tried to hang onto a place in the Prem.

He really has no PR skills.

On the point of where the Club gets the money to buy his real estate in July 2020 , no one can answer that , so in a sense it's not worth discussing.

Certainly there's no question of blaming McCabe for whatever source of finance the Prince ultimately chooses.

But McCabe can't get around the fact that he will potentially be in the same position with SUFC , as he was in 2007 with WHU.

If the Club can't afford his real estate , having been relegated , he might be in a position of putting the Club out of business.

We'll have to hope that he accords to SUFC the same amount of sympathy which he gave to WHU in 2007 !
I thought Mccabes 50% went to the prince on condition he buys the real estate, failing to buy that would mean he's not compliant with the judges ruling and McCabe would get the princes 50% by default.
Not in the know but that's how I thought the judges ruling meant.
If prince uses premiership money to buy Mccabe out! where does that leave us ?.
We would be short of funds to invest in the club which would leave us in a vulnerable position needing the cash to invest in players.
With that scenario it is possible Wilder would go as ambition to kick on would be limited ,even a relegation struggle.
If the prince is that short of cash maybe McCabe winning in the end and selling to the Americans.
Wilder is in prime position here as he tells it how it is and not getting support would make him consider his position.
Normally its shoes off to sack the manager ! with this situation it would be shoes off ! The owners out !!
 
There are some aspects to that interview that are an embarrassment to McCabe and maybe he needs some PR advice before agreeing to do these types of articles.

However for those coming out with the old cliches of 'let it go' and 'move on Kev' I know if I was in his position I would find it very difficult to just let it go and move on.
He's a big boy now. He's 71.
Surely he's learned to move on from his previous mistakes in life ?
The fact is , he can't sell the Club and keep it.
He's wanted to sell the Club for at least a decade.
So surely he's had time to contemplate moving on ?
Especially if sticking around , appealing decisions & moaning to the media is likely to make him appear such a black cloud hanging over the Club whilst it is trying to move forward.
 
The problem he (Kevin McCabe) has, is that the Prince's legal team are equivalent in stature to Man City in the Prem, whereas KM went for some Scottish Championship level lawyers (this is what someone in the legal profession told me and it is common knowledge in the legal profession apparently) to defend his case. I'm an admirer of KM's but his do it on the cheap mentality has cost him everything this time and he called the Prince a man of straw!!! He will no doubt do the same again as these lawyers fleece him for the next two years. "Ooch we cudne wen Kev but here's the bull by the way!". He has to overturn a decision that has been judged on (which is incredibly difficult to do) and overlook a clause in the contract that he and the Prince both signed. The stupid thing he did was to create an exit strategy that had no get out should it not be right at the time. When the circumstances changed for the positive (i.e. Premier league with a buyer waiting) all of a sudden KM wanted to change the goal posts. Unfortunately it's too late.
 
I thought Mccabes 50% went to the prince on condition he buys the real estate, failing to buy that would mean he's not compliant with the judges ruling and McCabe would get the princes 50% by default.
Not in the know but that's how I thought the judges ruling meant.
If prince uses premiership money to buy Mccabe out! where does that leave us ?.
We would be short of funds to invest in the club which would leave us in a vulnerable position needing the cash to invest in players.
With that scenario it is possible Wilder would go as ambition to kick on would be limited ,even a relegation struggle.
If the prince is that short of cash maybe McCabe winning in the end and selling to the Americans.
Wilder is in prime position here as he tells it how it is and not getting support would make him consider his position.
Normally its shoes off to sack the manager ! with this situation it would be shoes off ! The owners out !!
Have a look at the written ruling + the recording of the Prince's "evening with the fans" which occurred soon afterwards.
The Club has until July 2020 to buy the real estate.
I have lost track of how it is to be valued , but the Prince spoke of £40m & Kevin spoke of £50m.
If we are relegated by May 2020 , presumably its value will fall (the Lease of the Lane contemplated higher rents when the Club was in higher football tiers).

How the club finances the purchase is up to its owner (the Prince).

Certainly if , in July 2020 , Kevin is still appealing the ownership decision , then the Prince would have to be crazy to put in his own money.

But if Kevin has given up by then , or been denied a appeal , there are various sources of finance the Prince could consider :
1. His own money as equity or a loan ;
2. The money of his contacts as equity or a loan ;
3. A bank loan to be repaid over a period of time by the Club ;
4. An arrangement with Kevin , to pay Kevin over a period of time (like Kevin did with WHU in 2007).
5. Other sources I've not thought of.
 
Have a look at the written ruling + the recording of the Prince's "evening with the fans" which occurred soon afterwards.
The Club has until July 2020 to buy the real estate.
I have lost track of how it is to be valued , but the Prince spoke of £40m & Kevin spoke of £50m.
If we are relegated by May 2020 , presumably its value will fall (the Lease of the Lane contemplated higher rents when the Club was in higher football tiers).

How the club finances the purchase is up to its owner (the Prince).

Certainly if , in July 2020 , Kevin is still appealing the ownership decision , then the Prince would have to be crazy to put in his own money.

But if Kevin has given up by then , or been denied a appeal , there are various sources of finance the Prince could consider :
1. His own money as equity or a loan ;
2. The money of his contacts as equity or a loan ;
3. A bank loan to be repaid over a period of time by the Club ;
4. An arrangement with Kevin , to pay Kevin over a period of time (like Kevin did with WHU in 2007).
5. Other sources I've not thought of.
The Prince's company have to buy the assets. It could just use the income from the Premier League and leave us short in other areas.

Oh, and I don't see the value of the property changing as I very much doubt that there will be "Premier League" clauses in the lease agreement. Edit: there could be though, so who knows
 
I thought Mccabes 50% went to the prince on condition he buys the real estate, failing to buy that would mean he's not compliant with the judges ruling and McCabe would get the princes 50% by default.
Not in the know but that's how I thought the judges ruling meant.
If prince uses premiership money to buy Mccabe out! where does that leave us ?.
We would be short of funds to invest in the club which would leave us in a vulnerable position needing the cash to invest in players.
With that scenario it is possible Wilder would go as ambition to kick on would be limited ,even a relegation struggle.
If the prince is that short of cash maybe McCabe winning in the end and selling to the Americans.
Wilder is in prime position here as he tells it how it is and not getting support would make him consider his position.
Normally its shoes off to sack the manager ! with this situation it would be shoes off ! The owners out !!

JF's ruling requires the contract for the sale and purchase of SUL's shares in BLL to UTB for £5 million to be enacted. Thereafter UTB are required to purchase the Property Call Options by July 2020. The Judgement is silent on what action would take place should either party fail to meet their obligations under the Orders set out by JF.

There is no default mechanism that would allow either parties shares or assets to be acquired by the other as the Investors Share Agreement is no longer in existence. So in the event of the Permission to Appeal being refused by the Court of Appeal in the next 6 months the parties could be back in Court for one or more of the following reasons;

1. SUL refuse to sell their BLL shares to UTB for £5 million.
2. UTB and SUL can not agree on a price for the property call options - seems a given at the moment.
3. UTB fail to purchase the property call options at an agreed prIce by July 2020.

If the Appeal is granted then we are into 2021 to resolve this.
 
I hit the post button too early by accident.
The 3rd thing McCabe should say is :
3. A fair price will be set for my real estate which balances the interests of my family with those of the Club.

If he spoke this way , instead of talking about appeals & suing the Club , his reputation as benefactor might remain intact.

But if he carries on in the present vein , all his years of generosity will be forgotten and he'll be remembered as greedy to the end , no matter what damage he caused the Club just as it tried to hang onto a place in the Prem.

He really has no PR skills.

On the point of where the Club gets the money to buy his real estate in July 2020 , no one can answer that , so in a sense it's not worth discussing.

Certainly there's no question of blaming McCabe for whatever source of finance the Prince ultimately chooses.

But McCabe can't get around the fact that he will potentially be in the same position with SUFC , as he was in 2007 with WHU.

If the Club can't afford his real estate , having been relegated , he might be in a position of putting the Club out of business.

We'll have to hope that he accords to SUFC the same amount of sympathy which he gave to WHU in 2007 !


So how any purchase of assets is funded isn’t worth discussing because it’s in the future? Really? How the purchase of the property assets is funded is probably the most important issue facing fans, or should be, because it will cut the budget available because it has to be paid for next year, appeal not withstanding. McCabes bluster about suing is also something for the future but that’s okay, because it shows him, rightly so, in a bad light.

You’re suggesting McCabe should do the decent thing yet have totally ignored the point about why the expected valuation is more than £24m. (Additional properties in the agreement). I believe the hotel is valued in the last accounts at £16m so we’re at £40m without the other two properties.


The share price was Kev’s gamble that backfired.
 
The fact that the Prince seems to be getting on with running the club suggests (to me at least) he’s not too worried about raising the funds to buy out Kevin or any legal action Kevin may take.
And if McCabe is concerned that his Grandson feels unable to attend games now, how welcome does he think his Grandson would be should McCabes actions destroy the best chance we’ve had to establish ourselves in the top flight in decades?
 
I think Kevin only takes advice from person, himself.

I also don’t for one minute believe he would have sold up to those Americans, I don’t believe he would have willingly given up control of United to anyone.

He’s on record - during the court case - referring to a “part sale”- which made a few sit up and think he wasn’t going to sell and retire, despite what he’d said previously.
 

Kevin McCabe: West Ham deal was generous. We stopped them going belly up

Kevin McCabe talks to Henry Winter about the Carlos Tévez affair and the civil war engulfing Sheffield United before the London club’s visit



Kevin McCabe can handle a few West Ham United-supporting London cabbies asking him to leave their vehicles when they recognise the chairman of Sheffield United during the Carlos Tévez affair. McCabe can deal with the abusive letters received when his club won £21 million in compensation from West Ham for breaching Premier League rules over third-party ownership over Tévez and Javier Mascherano. Because McCabe knows he could have put West Ham out of business.

Sheffield United meet West Ham in the Premier League today for the first time since the Tévez affair of 2007, meeting only once since in the League Cup at Upton Park in 2014. West Ham fans have promised to wear Tévez masks, celebrating how they stayed up in 2007 and Sheffield United went down. “That’s banter between supporters,” McCabe smiles. “That doesn’t bother me at all.”

He took the threats in his stride. “Oh, gosh yes! Many! It didn’t go beyond abusive letters. I had one or two cabbies who threw me out the cab at the time, told me to get out. I think that’s gone. I’ve met a good few West Ham fans and explained the background.”
McCabe is sanguine now, sitting in the boardroom of his property empire in Knightsbridge, London, but 12 years ago, because of West Ham’s perfidy, McCabe’s steeliness was tested to the limit. “I had to pick people up off the floor. I got all the staff in a room at the stadium and at the academy to boost morale.
“We lost players because we couldn’t afford it. Everton were aware of the condition in Phil Jagielka’s contract [that he was available for £4 million if United got relegated]. Neil Warnock left. Then it was determining what to do and that was fight it. I don’t walk away.

“The scars have healed but we should never have been relegated. We’d done nothing wrong. West Ham broke the rules.
“I had no animosity to West Ham as a club. In London, with respect, Arsenal, Tottenham and Chelsea are upper crust. West Ham are like the Blades, working class. What happened was an incident caused by [Icelandic] owners rather than the club itself. What happened was immoral, illegal, and we caught the cold. When we won the tribunal case against West Ham, it was left to the two parties to sort out compensation or the arbitration panel would determine compensation.”

That could have cost West Ham up to £50 million, “to be paid within 14 days”, McCabe recalls. “But the last thing we wanted to do was damage West Ham at a time when the financial crisis had kicked in, when the Icelandic owner of West Ham had actually gone bankrupt.”

Sheffield United agreed £21 million to be paid over four years. “If we’d gone for broke, we could have put them into liquidation,” McCabe says. “The deal we struck was very generous to ensure West Ham would survive. The compensation helped us a little bit but nothing like 12 years’ loss of getting back to where we shouldn’t have been relegated from. But there’s no way we wanted West Ham to go belly up. Clubs underpin cities. United and Wednesday are vital to Sheffield. Leeds United are vital to Leeds. They’re part of what the fabric of our society is about.”

Sheffield United’s grievance also lay with the Premier League, then under Richard Scudamore as chief executive and Sir Dave Richards as chairman, which failed to impose a points deduction. “A lot of the blame, more than 50 per cent, was at the door of the Premier League itself,” McCabe adds. “Going back over some of the correspondence with Dave Richards, this pisses me off.
“It was clear-cut that the Premier League were going to deduct points. I’ve got a lot of time for Scudamore, brilliant guy. I’ve seen Richards [a former Sheffield Wednesday chairman] at functions in Sheffield. I asked for an apology. I maybe had muttered apologies. Richard Caborn is a mate of mine, he was Minister for Sport, he didn’t want to know. The FA?! Blazers! Society was against what we were doing to try and pursue football justice. The football fraternity didn’t want to know. Dave Whelan was sort of supportive. Graham Taylor supported us.”

Otherwise United were alone. “I only came across two people in boardrooms [back then] who impressed me, who taught me something. One was David Dein, the driving force behind Arsenal, who gave me inspiration by his dynamism. The other was David Sheepshanks at Ipswich Town. The others, the blazer-type chairmen or directors, were very unimpressive.’

It’s been a long road back. “We got stuck in League One, play-offs, had [ten] different managers. It took a lot of getting back and my gratitude is to the skills of Chris Wilder,” McCabe says. “Even though when he came on board, I got supporters in my ear when we got off to a bad start, saying, ‘Tha’s picked another one, McCabe, get rid of him now.’

“Chris has effervescence, energy and desire but the real key word is he’s instinctive. Warnock would set out not to lose. Chris sets out to win. Neil’s not got Chris’s wisdom. He’s top class. Chris probably learnt from Dave Bassett about blowing his top at players at times. Chris will give Dean [Henderson, the goalkeeper] a bollocking and two minutes later will have him in for a cup of tea. He balances it. He’s chosen [players] well. We’ve not spent that much. We’ve got valuable players now.”

And a valued assistant manager. “Alan Knill complements Chris,” McCabe says. “Alan’s a very sensible guy, he can calm Chris. Great combination. Chris and Alan are a bit like Brian Clough and Peter Taylor; friends but not out every night, wining and dining as families.”

So when they steered United into the Premier League in May, it was a special moment for McCabe. “I didn’t get Brahms and Liszt, skipping down the street. There was just satisfaction that I’d got them back,” he says. “I’ve put in over £100 million, a lot over. I go back a long way with the club. My background was tin bath and bread and dripping, we lived around the corner from the stadium. On Saturdays, there was nowt to do. My dad first took me to Bramall Lane when I was four. He took me to reserve games: 15,000 there with flat caps and little lads on their shoulders.

“The team of 1971 when we got to the old First Division were my heroes. It’s the most exciting I’ve seen. Alan Woodward! Tony Currie! Len Badger! Alan Hodgkinson! I was married on the day we returned for the first match [in the top division in 1971]. We beat Southampton [3-1] at home. We took our first flight to Ibiza and I missed five bloody games on honeymoon. I’ve always cursed my wife! I had a telex machine to update me on goals.”

All the while, McCabe was building his real-estate business. “I got to be known as ‘the lad with some brass in his pocket’, so I was asked to sponsor a game, joined the board. Being a true Sheffield United supporter I always resented — perhaps too strong a word — that Hillsborough had been developed via a grant for the 1966 World Cup. Bramall Lane was a tatty old ground. I’m a real estate guy. I’d planned out a vision of how I wanted it to be. It’s making Bramall Lane better than Hillsborough. And we’re the home of football. I’ve talked to the council. We need a big stainless steel football on the M1, bit like the Angel of the North.”

Exiled from the elite, after the Tévez affair, United were haemorrhaging £10 million a year at one point, which is why their astute player development and shrewd insertion of sell-on clauses helped. “When Kyle Walker went from Tottenham to Man City [for £45 million in 2017] we got £7 million out of that,” McCabe says. “When [Harry] Maguire went from Hull to Leicester [for £17 million in 2017] we got another £1 million. We sold [David] Brooks for £10 million [to Bournemouth in 2018].’

McCabe loves the club with a passion but finds his grip weakened immeasurably. Keen to follow the “Manchester City model” and bring in a wealthy backer, McCabe sold 50 per cent of the club to Prince Abdullah bin Mosaad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud of the Saudi royal family, but they gradually fell out, with unedifying comments on both sides. This year, to his horror, McCabe was ordered by the High Court to sell Prince Abdullah the remaining 50 per cent under the stipulation of the original agreement. “To us, it’s a travesty of justice,” McCabe says. “There is one family who’s gone through thick and thin with Sheffield United, and we feel cheated out of an owner’s position of losing 50 per cent of the football club.”

McCabe has until November 4 to submit his appeal. “It could take two years from now, six months before we know the application to appeal has been granted and 18 months or so for the appeal to be concluded, hopefully successfully,” he says. “Look, I’m strong. My real problem was my family. I have a grandson who’s even more keen on the Blades than I am. He doesn’t know quite which way to turn; he was used to going to the game every other week at Bramall Lane, now it’s something he can’t do. I don’t bear any hostility to Abdullah. I can still talk to him now, he has good humour, loves football and he does watch Sheffield United but mainly on screen.”

Under the agreement, Prince Abdullah has to purchase Bramall Lane and the training ground from McCabe for £50 million. “We’ve still not been paid for the real estate,” McCabe adds, “and will have to sue Sheffield United next year if they don’t pay for property. And we don’t want to do that. A lot of people know me from schooldays, they’re supporters, I’m a supporter. There is camaraderie — and insults as well — that persists with a local lad who owns the club. ‘Now then, Kev, how’s tha’ keeping?’ Some will say ‘Chairman’. You can’t replace [that connection] as you come on board as a foreigner. There’s jealousy and envy.

“I’ve known Billy Sharp [the United striker] since he was knee-high, I used to text him when he left us, playing for Donny Rovers. You build a relationship with people. When I went to the team hotel on Monday [before the home win over Arsenal], I had the players come across to me, they still call me ‘Chairman’. I’ve known 1,000 players at Sheffield United. I must have gone to 1,000 games since I was a nipper.”

The loss of the opportunity to hand on the club to his sons, Simon and Scott, does not actually worry him. “No, it’s too big a headache. Do I regret my association with the club? Part of me does. It’s an arduous task. I get letters all the time, asking for help and making complaints. It’s non-stop the things I’ve had to deal with.” He winces at the memory of the ‘Battle of Bramall Lane’ against West Brom in 2002 when three of Warnock’s players were dismissed and the match abandoned. “I was going to sack Warnock, until I saw you lot [reporters] on TV in those days with Jimmy Hill [on Sky], all sitting around, saying, ‘Sheffield United should be relegated.’ I said to myself, ‘I ain’t going to sack Warnock, am I now!’ ”

“Or the Ched Evans affair [the rape allegation], or getting calls in the morning about a [different] player in Halifax jail, or the silly lass [Sophie Jones] sent off against Tottenham and probably made an exception of because she was the first girl to be accused of racist abuse [against Spurs’ Renee Hector].”

McCabe is determined to fight Prince Abdullah for control of Sheffield United. “The club’s under the wrong ownership. He’s put a 22-year-old in charge as chairman, his son-in-law [Prince Musa’ad bin Khalid bin Abdulrahman Al Saud]. The young prince, when he gets to Sheffield, and the fans say, ‘Put your fooking hand in pocket,’ will not know what’s hit him. We are a working-class club and that’s said with pride.”

He’s tried to shield Wilder from the civil war. “He joined Sheffield United. He joined myself. I had a long telephone call with Chris the day after the [court] decision, because he asked what happens next? I said, ‘Don’t worry about me, just keep this club up.’ I think he’ll keep us up.”

McCabe won’t be there watching Wilder’s team today. “Sheffield United won’t give me tickets. That’s who we’re dealing with. But I’m a tough old dog. It’s never affected my health. I still play squash every week. I’ll be playing on Friday thinking that ball is Abdullah’s head! I jest! I’m a working-class lad from down the street and their sticks and stones don’t bother me. Go back to the Tévez affair — I didn’t quit.”
What true Sheffield United supporter would sue his own club? Let it go Kev ffs
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom