Safety Advisory Group not behind derby ticket restrictions.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




I'm now thinking it had to be The Pigs. They lowered it to cat B to try and sell out.

They have failed. So have given to us. If they hadn't they're effectively turning incone down which would have looked shit if the EFL cone asking qustions re ffp.

And Syp are unlikely to have had a change of heart if it was their decision in the 1st place to restrict our tickets.
 
So SAG don’t dictate it and I’m sure I read yesterday that the police will only police what they’re told to. They don’t say anything as to how many.

This leaves us and them.

Suggestions are the allocation is reciprocal. Fair enough. But as we’ve discussed, our ground simply can’t accommodate any more.

This means it’s them lot who are the bastards.

Wednesday bastards.
 
However it came about or whoever was responsible for the distribution allocations in the first place, a big hats off to Danny04 for setting the wheels in motion. We can moan about it on here all we like and yes, the issue was getting on my tits but it ultimately needed someone in the know to highlight it on a larger scale. Thanks Danny
 
Reckon South Yorkshire police could be blamed for starting the India v Pakistan war.

Christ, scapegoats of the millennium


They've already come out and said the ticketing thing is nothing to do with them.

SAG say it's not their decision.

No doubt someone will blame McCabe :rolleyes:
but l doubt we would say we didn't want all the tickets.

If it looks like a Pig, walks like a pig and grunts like a pig...
 
I'm now thinking it had to be The Pigs. They lowered it to cat B to try and sell out.

They have failed. So have given to us. If they hadn't they're effectively turning incone down which would have looked shit if the EFL cone asking qustions re ffp.

And Syp are unlikely to have had a change of heart if it was their decision in the 1st place to restrict our tickets.


Too much common sense in that last paragraph
 



Reckon South Yorkshire police could be blamed for starting the India v Pakistan war.

Christ, scapegoats of the millennium

Scapegoat implies that they're being blamed for the failings of others. It's been proved that not only were they directly responsible for the deaths at Hillsborough but they lied and in fact tried to scapegoat the fans. More recently, the Rotherham abuse that their incompetence allowed to happen seems to be a valid criticism. Not to mention the ridiculous capacity restrictions we've faced. How exactly are SYP being scapegoated?
 
S24SU does Sherlock Holmes.
Holmes: Watson, I can see some muddy foot prints". Too small for human feet, but too big for a birds foot prints".
Watson: Trotters?
Holmes: Elementary, my dear Watson.
 
It's easy to say it wasn't SYP or SAG's decision. What these organisations will do in negotiations over crowd issues is offer the club the opportunity to come up with a solution. They can easily reject a proposal from the club which they consider to be inadequate. For example, fan fires flare into away fans. What you gonna do about that SAG/SYP ask the club? Find the fan and ban him suggest the club. Erm no, reply SAG/SYP. So after several rounds of toing and froing with the ante increasing progressively, the club comes up with OK then, we'll close G&H. OK, that'll do, comes the reply.

In this instance I suggest that the lower tier was open all along and the ticket distribution was to be decided on an ongoing basis depending on home sales. That SAG and SYP had no input is laughable.
 
So who is behind all the seats that get netted off at BDTBL
Im pretty sure its not SUFC but according to SAG and SYP it must be
 
So who is behind all the seats that get netted off at BDTBL
Im pretty sure its not SUFC but according to SAG and SYP it must be

SAG have only commented on Mondays game haven't they? I suspect any nettingwould have been in place that's not now needed.

Out of interest, anyone have tickets for the first five rows?
 
So who is behind all the seats that get netted off at BDTBL
Im pretty sure its not SUFC but according to SAG and SYP it must be

See my post #20. The club expresses a desire to house home fans in the UT and away fans in the LT. SAG asks what measures will be put in place to optimise the separation between the fans before they can sanction this. The club then proposes to net off the first five rows. So its the club's decision and not SAG's. Sort of.
 
It's easy to say it wasn't SYP or SAG's decision. What these organisations will do in negotiations over crowd issues is offer the club the opportunity to come up with a solution. They can easily reject a proposal from the club which they consider to be inadequate. For example, fan fires flare into away fans. What you gonna do about that SAG/SYP ask the club? Find the fan and ban him suggest the club. Erm no, reply SAG/SYP. So after several rounds of toing and froing with the ante increasing progressively, the club comes up with OK then, we'll close G&H. OK, that'll do, comes the reply.

In this instance I suggest that the lower tier was open all along and the ticket distribution was to be decided on an ongoing basis depending on home sales. That SAG and SYP had no input is laughable.


Agree this is nearer the truth. Pigs will say they sold out 3 sides of the ground last year and were then able to sell to their fans in the Lower tier. They were just waiting to see how sales went. Due to there not being sufficient take up the tickets were made available to us. Pigs would probably have had to tell SYP in advance they expected Lower tier to be populated to enable SYP to sort out resources. So if they were paying for the extra Plod they may as well sell tickets to someone.

SYP may not make the decision but they certainly influence them. There were suggestions by our ticket office that they imposed a minimum points requirement for purchase of Derby tickets at the Lane when the Pigs have had no such restrictions for the up and coming game at the Sty. Add to that their interference in non ticket issues in the past such as closing pubs and kettling fans on trams and its hard to believe they had no impact whatsoever on ticket allocations and distribution.
 
SAG have only commented on Mondays game haven't they? I suspect any nettingwould have been in place that's not now needed.

Out of interest, anyone have tickets for the first five rows?

Thats a good question and one that I thought of as I picked up one of the last tickets from the extra 646 allocation yesterday. I'm on row 8.
 



Rodley not behind leaving the toilet seat up after coming home pissed.

^I think this is about as plausible as the OP subject ;):D
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom