Cerberus Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2015
- Messages
- 13,631
- Reaction score
- 20,993
Do I need to? Just watch the video highlights.Was he? Can you explain that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Do I need to? Just watch the video highlights.Was he? Can you explain that?
Do I need to? Just watch the video highlights.
I have done, I watched it at the time as well. The play is nowhere near Freeman. The pass that leads to the goal goes between Basham and Egan.
Are you talking about a different goal?
I will watch it again Sir! At the time, viewing from the upper tier of the Brook street stand, it looked to me like Freeman should have gone to tackle him but didn’t. If that’s not the case then I retract that view. He’s got “form” though of late and I’m probably guilty of getting a bit frustrated with his half-arsed attempts at defending.
He needs a rest imo.
Fair play! I’ve probably just got a hate thing going on here for Freeman. I’m going to have a word with myself!I didn’t think it was Freeman’s fault, the play was too central. Basham stepped in to make a tackle and didn’t, which left a gap.
Yep. I looked at it again and you're right. It was Egan who failed to make a tackle not Freeman. As you say, Freeman was out wide and this came down the centre. I retract what I said about Freeman on this occasion then.I didn’t think it was Freeman’s fault, the play was too central. Basham stepped in to make a tackle and didn’t, which left a gap.
Hmm. Play like a bunch of cunts v Rotherham so the manager makes changes. Then we win and play well with it. Forum consensus on team for Leeds? Go back to pretty much the same team team vs Rotherham. I'll have to sleep on that one.
Agreed, they both deserve a decent run out if the score allows for this.Sharp and Mcgoldrick up top, Duffy back in, Baldock in for Freeman being the only change to the usual starting 11. Could see Clarke and Washington both coming on as subs as well.
Can you be more specific?
Hendo
Baldy - Bash - Egan - JOC - Stevo
Nozzer (Couts 80?) Flecky
Duffer (Washer 60?)
Sharper Goldilox (Clarky 70?)
Prediction: A very hard fought slender win in a very, very open game. Going for 1-1 at HT with a 2-1 win for the RAWW
Attendance: 29,046
Possession: 60:40
Roofe to score first 16min
Sharp to equalise 41min
Sharp to net the winner 85min
that ok?![]()
Cumbersome? Shit, we've re-signed Higdon!- - - - - - - - - - ----------Lager
- - - - - --------Hernia - Tank-Top - Sanskrit
Cumbersome - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------Phlegm
- - - - - - -------Quack - - - - Skunkworks
- - - - - - - - - - -----------Elsie
-------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Narcotic
- - - - - - - - - Synopsis
Subs: Goon, Labia, Soap, Panjandrum, Yorick, Pendular, Sharp
Edit: talking bolloxI’d bring Sharp, Duffy and Baldock in to replace McGoldrick, lundstrum and freeman.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?