Team v Leeds

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

HeCanDoMagic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
7,511
Reaction score
13,640
Location
Hadfield (nr Glossop)
All of a sudden this has become a bit tricky.

Lundstram and Washington staking a claim by being key contributors to a performance more like what we’re used to seeing.

Freeman only made the team due to Baldock being ill, however I still think Freeman was poor by his standards last night and if Baldock is fit I think he will play.

The key areas then;
  • The front two
  • The midfield 3 (Duffy v Lundstram)
  • Right wing back
Thoughts?

Id go Baldock, Duffy and Sharp/McG up front.
 



Duffy for Lundstram, Baldock for Freeman, Sharp for Washington and (I wouldn't) Clarke for McG
 
I think Washingtons performance last night gives him a real chance of starting against Leeds. It'll be a similar type of game to the Brentford one & having his pace as an outlet might just sway it in his favour.

Henderson

Basham - Egan - O'Connell
Stevens Baldock
Fleck - Norwood
Duffy
Washington - Clarke

I think McGoldrick might need a rest & Clarke was a real pest when he came on. Baldock in for the mis-firing Freeman & then Duffy in for Lundstram.
 
Washington has to come on (around 60 mins) and show us more of what he can do. I suppose the state of the game determines that though.

Hendo
Baldy - Bash - Egan - JOC - Stevo
Nozzer (Couts 80?) Flecky
Duffer (Washer 60?)
Sharper Goldilox (Clarky 70?)

Prediction: A very hard fought slender win in a very, very open game. Going for 1-1 at HT with a 2-1 win for the RAWW

Attendance: 29,046

Possession: 60:40

:D:D:D


UTMB
 
Sharp will come back in space of Washington
Clarke will come in for Mcgoldrick
Baldock will come in for Freeman

We will need to dominate possession to get anything against Leeds and try to limit them to long balls out from the back which is the exact opposite of how we set up and played last night.
 
- - - - - - - - - - ----------Lager

- - - - - --------Hernia - Tank-Top - Sanskrit

Cumbersome - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------Phlegm

- - - - - - -------Quack - - - - Skunkworks

- - - - - - - - - - -----------Elsie

-------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Narcotic
- - - - - - - - - Synopsis


Subs: Goon, Labia, Soap, Panjandrum, Yorick, Pendular, Sharp
 
- - - - - - - - - - ----------Lager

- - - - - --------Hernia - Tank-Top - Sanskrit

Cumbersome - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------Phlegm

- - - - - - -------Quack - - - - Skunkworks

- - - - - - - - - - -----------Elsie

-------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Narcotic
- - - - - - - - - Synopsis


Subs: Goon, Labia, Soap, Panjandrum, Yorick, Pendular, Sharp

6fe.jpg
 
I’ll leave it to CW

Very sensible. Some of course will take personal offence if he thinks it fit to select a team that doesn’t feature their favourite Bladey Blade. That’s much more important than the team as a whole.
 
Very sensible. Some of course will take personal offence if he thinks it fit to select a team that doesn’t feature their favourite Bladey Blade. That’s much more important than the team as a whole.
The thread is for people to provide their opinion on what team they would select on Saturday not what they think CW will actually pick.

Who would you pick?
 



Anybody. He’s my favourite player and must start every game. If he doesn’t the manager is an idiot.
Coutts in goal in place of Henderson, at the special request of Justice Pinch. You heard it here first... :)
 
Hmm. Play like a bunch of cunts v Rotherham so the manager makes changes. Then we win and play well with it. Forum consensus on team for Leeds? Go back to pretty much the same team team vs Rotherham. I'll have to sleep on that one.
Freeman is currently the biggest sticking point for me. He has been so poor recently he must be taken out of the team. Last night I think we won despite him, not because of him (which sounds a lot more harsh than intended). Time to freshen that position up for while.
 
I’d be inclined to start Washington over Billy, give him 45-60 mins and get him to run his bollocks off. Same with Duffy. It’d give them something to worry about at the back.

But I think we might start Billy ahead of Washington.
 
All of a sudden this has become a bit tricky.

Lundstram and Washington staking a claim by being key contributors to a performance more like what we’re used to seeing.

Freeman only made the team due to Baldock being ill, however I still think Freeman was poor by his standards last night and if Baldock is fit I think he will play.

The key areas then;
  • The front two
  • The midfield 3 (Duffy v Lundstram)
  • Right wing back
Thoughts?

Id go Baldock, Duffy and Sharp/McG up front.



I am confused. How was Lunstram a key contributor to last night? You didn't know he was on the pitch most of the time.

Fans now view him not doing anything wrong in a game as a benchmark for a good performance. He didn't have any major impact on last nights win. He was just steady away, didn't do anything brilliant didn't do anything wrong.

In terms of making an impact on the game the other two in midfield were head and shoulders above him.

I want all United players to do well but these tinted glasses some fans wear when watching Lundstram is ridiculous.
 
I am confused. How was Lunstram a key contributor to last night? You didn't know he was on the pitch most of the time.

Fans now view him not doing anything wrong in a game as a benchmark for a good performance. He didn't have any major impact on last nights win. He was just steady away, didn't do anything brilliant didn't do anything wrong.

In terms of making an impact on the game the other two in midfield were head and shoulders above him.

I want all United players to do well but these tinted glasses some fans wear when watching Lundstram is ridiculous.
I'm no fan of Lundstram and cant say his appearance on the team-sheet filled me with confidence. However, he put in a confident performance, looked a lot fitter and sharper than usual. Kept the ball ticking over and provided the platform which allowed Norwood and particularly Fleck to influence the game further forward. His contributions in defence too cannot be overstated, providing much needed support to an under performing Freeman.

So, with no glasses on, I can confidently say he was a key contributor last night.
 
Difficult for Wilder this as Washington was great last night but clearly not as prolific a finisher as Billy so what does he do ? Potential more threat to pressure them from Washington but give Billy a chance and it’s back of net !
 
Although Washington and Lundstram both had good games I would bring Billy and Duffy back in and play Leon up front with Billy
 
Theres a reason why Billy and Duffy were rested last night. Our leading goalscorer and most creative player who caused Weeds problems in both games last season. No brainer for CW on those two starting. As for Freeman and McGoldrick both look in need of a rest but training the rest of the week will determine whether Baldock and Clarke start in their places.
 
Difficult for Wilder this as Washington was great last night but clearly not as prolific a finisher as Billy so what does he do ? Potential more threat to pressure them from Washington but give Billy a chance and it’s back of net !

The answer is fairly obvious - play them both . Based on last night's performance and with Duffy just behind , Washington could prove to be the perfect foil for Billy and create more space for him to ply his deadly trade .

After his performances last night and against Rovrum , McGoldrick deserves no more than a place on the bench . For those who consider this to be the ultimate heresy and that he is the reincarnation of Dennis Bergkamp , I would simply refer you to Deadbat's summary of his performance in last night's game , with which I agree 100 %.
 
Reckon there’s a decent chance of Washington starting. Wilder said he hasn’t been playing at home because teams sit back and there isn’t room in behind. Surely Leeds aren’t going to come and sit back
 



I am confused. How was Lunstram a key contributor to last night? You didn't know he was on the pitch most of the time.

Fans now view him not doing anything wrong in a game as a benchmark for a good performance. He didn't have any major impact on last nights win. He was just steady away, didn't do anything brilliant didn't do anything wrong.

In terms of making an impact on the game the other two in midfield were head and shoulders above him.

I want all United players to do well but these tinted glasses some fans wear when watching Lundstram is ridiculous.
Quite a valid point thinking about it ! Your post did make me laugh actually because I was singing his praises last night and yeah, why ?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom