Conclusions from Blades v Swansea

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Beans

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
2,452
Reaction score
14,660
So... how's everyone feeling this Monday? ;)

Annoying as it was to lose this weekend, I've put together some analysis of the game and a bunch of conclusions to take from it. It digs into our defending, the performances of Fleck, Lundstram, thoughts on the debutants, and a few other things too. Stats and fancy charts galore. I'll not paste the whole thing here as it's a beast, but you can read it all here:

https://www.uptheblades.com/latest-articles/2018/8/6/conclusions-from-blades-swansea

However, here's what I had to say about Fleck's performance if you'd like a little taster:

Fleck Couldn't Get Into The Game
One of United’s stylistic hallmarks under Wilder is that we’ve been generally excellent at getting the ball from defence into the final third, usually through progressive passing across the whole pitch. Yesterday was slightly different, and although we edged the territory stats, it was a grind to get the ball into dangerous areas.

One major disappointment with the game was the performance of John Fleck. I say this not as a criticism of Fleck, who didn’t really do anything wrong per se – just that we weren’t able to get the best out of him. I mentioned in my piece after the Inter friendly about why I was happy with a midfield three of Evans, Lundstram and Fleck: because in that Inter game, Fleck was released to play higher up the pitch and be heavily involved in all our attacks, driving the ball forward, creating and shooting.

Against Swansea… not so much. Here’s Fleck’s pass map from the game (blue arrows are completed passes, red incompleted):

John+Fleck+pass+map+v+Swansea


Notice how confined to the left wing he was? And the gaping hole in the 20 yards or so outside of the centre of the penalty box? This was a very restricted performance from the one player in that midfield three who can make things happen. With him playing this kind of game, it’s little wonder that our play felt largely conservative.

So why did this happen? It may be tactical (though I doubt it) – far more likely is that Swansea had done their homework. Check the average positions of the Swansea midfield three (below, info via SofaScore) – ultra-compact, and also shading to the right side of the pitch, meaning the side in which Fleck usually sets up. Furthermore, McBurnie (number 9) dropped into this space regularly, meaning that there was precious little room for Fleck to receive, turn, run, pass – all the things that he typically does.

Swansea+average+positions


Plenty more on this, including a deep dive into the ability of this midfield three, right here :)

https://www.uptheblades.com/latest-articles/2018/8/6/conclusions-from-blades-swansea

Cheers for reading.
 



When Duffy plays he does move more around the pitch and stretch things.

However I am slightly worried that his legs are on the brink and I think CW thinks that as well.
 
One thing that annoyed me is how many of our crosses and dead ball kicks, especially first half, sailed straight over everyones heads into touch. Saw too much of this last season and I'm shouting don't hit it so hard next time. Other teams don't do this so much and its a waste as at least a slightly short ball is still in play and can be fought for.
 
Wow, great analyis,

Be careful though, as Bergen Blade and Deadbat might go halves on a hit man.

I've changed my identity to try and protect myself.

One thing that annoyed me is how many of our crosses and dead ball kicks, especially first half, sailed straight over everyones heads into touch. Saw too much of this last season and I'm shouting don't hit it so hard next time. Other teams don't do this so much and its a waste as at least a slightly short ball is still in play and can be fought for.

But then you might commit the cardinal footballing sin of "not beating the first man"! ;) No, you're right, we were pretty poor from dead balls and crosses all game.
 
When Duffy plays he does move more around the pitch and stretch things.

However I am slightly worried that his legs are on the brink and I think CW thinks that as well.
Don't know how that can be judged since he gets so little time on the pitch these days.
Unless the inferred result is from stats over training sessions
 
Very good write-up. Balanced, considered and insightful. Are you Blades Analytics on Twitter? Really like that account.
 
So... how's everyone feeling this Monday? ;)

Annoying as it was to lose this weekend, I've put together some analysis of the game and a bunch of conclusions to take from it. It digs into our defending, the performances of Fleck, Lundstram, thoughts on the debutants, and a few other things too. Stats and fancy charts galore. I'll not paste the whole thing here as it's a beast, but you can read it all here:

https://www.uptheblades.com/latest-articles/2018/8/6/conclusions-from-blades-swansea

However, here's what I had to say about Fleck's performance if you'd like a little taster:

Fleck Couldn't Get Into The Game
One of United’s stylistic hallmarks under Wilder is that we’ve been generally excellent at getting the ball from defence into the final third, usually through progressive passing across the whole pitch. Yesterday was slightly different, and although we edged the territory stats, it was a grind to get the ball into dangerous areas.

One major disappointment with the game was the performance of John Fleck. I say this not as a criticism of Fleck, who didn’t really do anything wrong per se – just that we weren’t able to get the best out of him. I mentioned in my piece after the Inter friendly about why I was happy with a midfield three of Evans, Lundstram and Fleck: because in that Inter game, Fleck was released to play higher up the pitch and be heavily involved in all our attacks, driving the ball forward, creating and shooting.

Against Swansea… not so much. Here’s Fleck’s pass map from the game (blue arrows are completed passes, red incompleted):

John+Fleck+pass+map+v+Swansea


Notice how confined to the left wing he was? And the gaping hole in the 20 yards or so outside of the centre of the penalty box? This was a very restricted performance from the one player in that midfield three who can make things happen. With him playing this kind of game, it’s little wonder that our play felt largely conservative.

So why did this happen? It may be tactical (though I doubt it) – far more likely is that Swansea had done their homework. Check the average positions of the Swansea midfield three (below, info via SofaScore) – ultra-compact, and also shading to the right side of the pitch, meaning the side in which Fleck usually sets up. Furthermore, McBurnie (number 9) dropped into this space regularly, meaning that there was precious little room for Fleck to receive, turn, run, pass – all the things that he typically does.

Swansea+average+positions


Plenty more on this, including a deep dive into the ability of this midfield three, right here :)

https://www.uptheblades.com/latest-articles/2018/8/6/conclusions-from-blades-swansea

Cheers for reading.

Great stuff, thanks, Beans.

Just one thing on the blog - and it's probably me being pedantic - but can you change the font to something easier to read?
It looks a bit Times New Roman and I find that hard to read at the best of times - Arial would be my choice :)

I'll be Bladepicker would concur ;)
 
Very good write-up. Balanced, considered and insightful. Are you Blades Analytics on Twitter? Really like that account.

Nah, but www.uptheblades.com is a joint effort with him :) I'm @BladesPod.

Great stuff, thanks, Beans.

Just one thing on the blog - and it's probably me being pedantic - but can you change the font to something easier to read?
It looks a bit Times New Roman and I find that hard to read at the best of times - Arial would be my choice :)

I'll be Bladepicker would concur ;)

Cheers Kenilworth - I'll have a play around, site is kind of in beta at the moment I suppose, although that implies that I know what I'm doing :) Needs a little design work but wanted to get it live before the season started - I'll take a look at fonts as a priority.
 
When Duffy plays he does move more around the pitch and stretch things.

However I am slightly worried that his legs are on the brink and I think CW thinks that as well.
I felt halfway through last season his mobility wasn't what it had been.
Ability never leaves you, he has that undoubtedly, but his legs don't get him about the pitch these days as well as they need to at this level.
My opinion of course, but it's one thing having an opinion and another thing knowing what the fuck you are talking about :-)
 
I’m still bloody furious mate
so let me get this straight.. fleck was on the pitch?? on the fucking left wing?? is sven in charge now?
 
Oppo managers have done their homework. They know Fleck is our only midfielder who gets forward and they are aiming to nullify him. When they succeed we end up with numerous sideways and backwards passes and with no proper winger our penetration is nil.

What we really need is a midfielder who can go past players and draw the opposition defence out creating space for the forwards.
 
When Duffy plays he does move more around the pitch and stretch things.

However I am slightly worried that his legs are on the brink and I think CW thinks that as well.

When we had Paul McGrath his legs had gone but it didn't stop him being our best defender at the time. Slightly different I know but the point still stands, & an hour of Duffy is of much more value than 90 minutes of Evans/Lundstrum.
 
I've spent all day yesterday analysing our performance and I've come to the conclusion we were shit.
 



Great stuff, thanks, Beans.

Just one thing on the blog - and it's probably me being pedantic - but can you change the font to something easier to read?
It looks a bit Times New Roman and I find that hard to read at the best of times - Arial would be my choice :)

I'll be Bladepicker would concur ;)

Without a doubt.

You don't want your text too big or too small either.

I find 10 does the job perfectly when matched up with Arial. :D
 
Excellent analysis Beansie and very accuarate. The stats tell us how many tackles/headers/passes etc but the truth is that too many players particularly in defence and midfield didn’t do the basics properly.
In particular Lundstram and Evans don’t get box to box quickly enough (a minimum requirement in modern football) and the wing backs don’t defend well enough (again another given) in my view.
We won’t come against many sides with the pace and power of the Swansea wide players (Fulham, Wolves were similar last season) thankfully but we must change the way we set up when we do by playing the flat back four or nullifying it by playing wingers ourselves (we need to sign at least one more)
 
So... how's everyone feeling this Monday? ;)

Annoying as it was to lose this weekend, I've put together some analysis of the game and a bunch of conclusions to take from it. It digs into our defending, the performances of Fleck, Lundstram, thoughts on the debutants, and a few other things too. Stats and fancy charts galore. I'll not paste the whole thing here as it's a beast, but you can read it all here:

https://www.uptheblades.com/latest-articles/2018/8/6/conclusions-from-blades-swansea

However, here's what I had to say about Fleck's performance if you'd like a little taster:

Fleck Couldn't Get Into The Game
One of United’s stylistic hallmarks under Wilder is that we’ve been generally excellent at getting the ball from defence into the final third, usually through progressive passing across the whole pitch. Yesterday was slightly different, and although we edged the territory stats, it was a grind to get the ball into dangerous areas.

One major disappointment with the game was the performance of John Fleck. I say this not as a criticism of Fleck, who didn’t really do anything wrong per se – just that we weren’t able to get the best out of him. I mentioned in my piece after the Inter friendly about why I was happy with a midfield three of Evans, Lundstram and Fleck: because in that Inter game, Fleck was released to play higher up the pitch and be heavily involved in all our attacks, driving the ball forward, creating and shooting.

Against Swansea… not so much. Here’s Fleck’s pass map from the game (blue arrows are completed passes, red incompleted):

John+Fleck+pass+map+v+Swansea


Notice how confined to the left wing he was? And the gaping hole in the 20 yards or so outside of the centre of the penalty box? This was a very restricted performance from the one player in that midfield three who can make things happen. With him playing this kind of game, it’s little wonder that our play felt largely conservative.

So why did this happen? It may be tactical (though I doubt it) – far more likely is that Swansea had done their homework. Check the average positions of the Swansea midfield three (below, info via SofaScore) – ultra-compact, and also shading to the right side of the pitch, meaning the side in which Fleck usually sets up. Furthermore, McBurnie (number 9) dropped into this space regularly, meaning that there was precious little room for Fleck to receive, turn, run, pass – all the things that he typically does.

Swansea+average+positions


Plenty more on this, including a deep dive into the ability of this midfield three, right here :)

https://www.uptheblades.com/latest-articles/2018/8/6/conclusions-from-blades-swansea

Cheers for reading.
Bit complex that I think we need to get the basics right first.
Stop losing possession in critical areas leaving us exposed,get the strikers playing as a unit not miles apart, creativity in midfield obviously play Duffy they will do for a start.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom