Not a pisstake. Just because it's not familiar everyone freaks out, and that's where the problem is you end up playing the same way week in week out, along with the same weaknesses.
I believe that if Wilder tried it everyone would be surprised at how much better we play.
We're too open at the back atm.
Its certainly unfamiliar, but its also changing the entire defence and midfield to accommodate a system which may or may not work.
You may indeed be correct, change the system to something which is defensively minded away from home, however, I think, because of the unfamiliarity that we have with the system, the players would struggle to adapt, especially as you’re also handing out 3 debuts in the team you presented.
I’m all for change if things don’t work, so perhaps bring in one of the two new centre halves and try something slightly different, Evolution not revolution.
Our home form has proved that we are fairly capable, even at the back, conceding 1 goal in 3 games.
I’d also urge caution, last season, albeit in a division lower against shite opposition, we played some of the best football of my (almost) 40 years, we played with a system which exploited the wing backs and scored freely.
This season has been different, chances are hard to come by, but I also agree with Wilder, we need to be better up top and at the back. I also think there is room for improvement in the midfield and certainly at wing backs, because both wingbacks have struggled. However, I don’t think it’s a red flag to say that the system is wrong. We are still creating chances, but not finishing them. We’re defending ok, but also making individual mistakes.
5 games into a 46 games season, its not the time to radically overhaul things. Personally I think a return to a back four would be a mistake, the players aren’t at the club to make it work. And ironically, the back four is more familiar to most of us on here than the back three.