Bladey McBladeface
Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2016
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 1,413
He seemed totally oblivious to the fact that the Premier League is made up Bournemouth, Palace, West Brom, Burnley, Southampton, Stoke, Leicester, Watford, Swansea, West Ham, Middlesbrough and Hull.
That's more than half of the division taken up by clubs traditionally smaller than United
Then you can add teams to that list that have been regular Premier League members over the last 20 years or so, teams like Wolves, Derby, Forest, Blackburn, Bolton, Leeds, Birmingham, Coventry, Portsmouth, QPR, Fulham and Wigan,
SBT and I made this point to him but he still couldn't see it.
And we call Wendies brainwashed.
At least their brainwashed into positivity
I take your point and there are teams in the Premier League who are overachieving in terms of their history and stature. Can we honestly put the likes of West Ham (as much as I hate them) in that bracket though?
The other thing to add is that there has been a shift in football geography. Where you are located has a big bearing on your success. It's surely no coincidence that there are no teams from Yorkshire in the Premier League. Whereas your Bournemouth's, Southampton's and Brighton's are already there or are knocking on the door. Similarly clubs from London such as Palace and Fulham (are and have) benefit hugely from being in the capital.
Players want to play where they want to live. You will always get exceptions to the rule but it's why Newcastle/Sunderland (despite their support) will struggle to achieve.