Darren Deadman

[PokerBlade]

If you could just post this on whatever Shrewsbury boards Roy found, that'd be great.

 

[GrayBlade]

Is Billy our best penalty taker? I don't think he's that good at taking them, to be honest.

How many has Billy missed since he came back to us; two?

Shocking, let's give Done or Fleck a shot!

Seriously, he does tend to hit it central but he's not done three bad has he buddy? Next time round the keeper will think he's going to go for the bottom corner...and he'll hit it down his throat.

 

[Ldn_Rd_Blades]

How many has Billy missed since he came back to us; two?

Shocking, let's give Done or Fleck a shot!

Seriously, he does tend to hit it central but he's not done three bad has he buddy? Next time round the keeper will think he's going to go for the bottom corner...and he'll hit it down his throat.

According to this he missed 1 in 6 last season and 1 in 3 this season

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/elfmeterschuetzen/wettbewerb/GB3/plus/1?saison_id=2015#ath

 

[JohnDenver]

That looks miles worse than first my view from the SS suggested.

Originally it looked like a bouncing ball that Coutts nicked away from their lad, but there's no excuse for a straight leg challenge at knee height. None at all.

 

[seanbeenstattoo]

Thought the ref had an outstanding game. Got every big decision right and believe me Shrewsbury would have played stupid cunts at every freekick if he hadn't got his spray out for the 10 yard line. 10 out of 10 Mr Deadman.

 

[coaxingstar71]

Yes I'd say he is despite him not being that great. His technique is to rip the back of the net off which occasionally results in misses. We haven't had a proper penalty taker since Nick Blackman.

Baxter?..............................................

 

[GrayBlade]

According to this he missed 1 in 6 last season and 1 in 3 this season

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/elfmeterschuetzen/wettbewerb/GB3/plus/1?saison_id=2015#ath

That'll be two misses in nine then. Shocking stats aren't they mate? I can see why some want him replaced.

Those who wanted him dropped in August were right. He's just a an overweight passenger who's past his sell by date.

 

[Sirius]

We should be good enough to rise above any poor referee.

So we should ,but a bad ref has more influence than a good player if he so wishes.

 

[Pinchy]

The coutts challenge is as simple as......If the foot was planted then then was a broken Tib and Fib.....Been on the receiving end of similar and suffered that exact fate.

That area of the leg isn't designed to take an impact and no amount of muscle can defend from it.

Even if it is to be considered sloppy / mistimed then this doesn't detract from the fact that it is an extremely dangerous challenge and a straight red.

It was deliberate and nasty. He deserved three reds. Twat.

 

[I should coco]

Deadman still gave an episode of the Darren Deadman show again.

Occasionally you get a ref who you don't even notice because of the way he allows the game to run. Yesterday you couldn't fail to observe the DD show as he kept getting in the bloody way.

Several time in the 2nd half he managed to position himself just outside the 'D' and be in the way when we tried to switch the ball to the other side of the penalty box.

What do the EFL say at the end of the season when they look at ref stats? Most of them have an average of say, 3.5 yellow cards per game and then Trevor Kettle and Deadman have half a dozen reds per game. "Carry on lads and see you again next August"

 

[mattbianco1]

If you ignore the name of the ref you won't have any questions about the two reds. Not going to pretend I'm suddenly a fan of Deadman but today he didn't have much choice.

Official rule:

Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity in the penalty area is no longer a straight red card - unless the offence is holding, pulling or pushing; there's no attempt to play or no possibility of making a challenge; or it's an offence which is punishable by a red card, no matter where on the pitch it happens - violent conduct, for example.

Violent conduct is punishable by a red card even if no contact is made.

That means it was an incorrect decision.

 

[Tynemouth Blade]

Watching the highlights again, I don't think the red card was for the challenge but for the verbals he gave the ref; penalty had been awarded then there's a delay before he gets out the card during which time the player in question is giving #*$# to the ref!
The 2nd red card he goes straight to his pocket as soon as the foul is made!

 

[Jehovah]

I've often thought with BIllys penalties, someone is just going to not move as keeps hitting them down the middle. Some keepers watch videos of oppositions penalties and Billy always does this. Hes scored enough to let him off though.

 

[MobileBlade]

Official rule:

Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity in the penalty area is no longer a straight red card - unless the offence is holding, pulling or pushing; there's no attempt to play or no possibility of making a challenge; or it's an offence which is punishable by a red card, no matter where on the pitch it happens - violent conduct, for example.

Violent conduct is punishable by a red card even if no contact is made.

That means it was an incorrect decision.

As I said in another thread, the key part is "there's ... no possibility of making a challenge" - that is there is no way the player making the challenge could have won the ball. Go back, watch the highlights, see where the ball was, and in particular which direction it had gone, when the challenge was made. I think you may change your mind.

One decision he did get wrong, though and it is the second time I have seen this at the Lane this season - following the Coutts red card decision, Coutts was made to leave the pitch to come straight back on. Where a yellow or red card is issued, the injured player if he is fit to continue no longer needs to leave the field.

 

[JohnDenver]

As I said in another thread, the key part is "there's ... no possibility of making a challenge" - that is there is no way the player making the challenge could have won the ball. Go back, watch the highlights, see where the ball was, and in particular which direction it had gone, when the challenge was made. I think you may change your mind.

One decision he did get wrong, though and it is the second time I have seen this at the Lane this season - following the Coutts red card decision, Coutts was made to leave the pitch to come straight back on. Where a yellow or red card is issued, the injured player if he is fit to continue no longer needs to leave the field.

You're quite right on the first red. The Shrews player can't win the ball from where he went in. He might have been making a genuine attempt but it was a doomed one made out of panic. If he'd come in from the side and missed the ball then it's a yellow.

 

[HighfieldBlade]

Darren Deadman...I can just imagine him getting teased at school for having a name like that (poor chap). Bet he thought to himself 'I'm gonna get a job where I can boss people around , see how YOU like it '.

 

[Good Pinch Of Snuff]

best ref int league

 

[United Aren't Back.]

The player is deliberately going for the man.
Shit though his team are he could still have gone for the ball more accurately than that. He didn't because he went to injure the player.

 

[United Aren't Back.]

Official rule:

Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity in the penalty area is no longer a straight red card - unless the offence is holding, pulling or pushing; there's no attempt to play or no possibility of making a challenge; or it's an offence which is punishable by a red card, no matter where on the pitch it happens - violent conduct, for example.

Violent conduct is punishable by a red card even if no contact is made.

That means it was an incorrect decision.

At the time I felt it was given for the verbal. I looked at video and still think so.

 

[Ldn_Rd_Blades]

You're quite right on the first red. The Shrews player can't win the ball from where he went in. He might have been making a genuine attempt but it was a doomed one made out of panic. If he'd come in from the side and missed the ball then it's a yellow.

 

[s4-blade]

One decision he did get wrong, though and it is the second time I have seen this at the Lane this season - following the Coutts red card decision, Coutts was made to leave the pitch to come straight back on. Where a yellow or red card is issued, the injured player if he is fit to continue no longer needs to leave the field.

Couttsy went off because his leg was dripping with blood. You still have to go off with blood.

 

[MobileBlade]

Couttsy went off because his leg was dripping with blood. You still have to go off with blood.

He went to the touchline. Play immediately restarted as soon as he got there and he was waved straight back on. There was no touchline treatment.

 

[PokerBlade]

Official rule:

Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity in the penalty area is no longer a straight red card - unless the offence is holding, pulling or pushing; there's no attempt to play or no possibility of making a challenge; or it's an offence which is punishable by a red card, no matter where on the pitch it happens - violent conduct, for example.

Violent conduct is punishable by a red card even if no contact is made.

That means it was an incorrect decision.

"there's no attempt to play or no possibility of making a challenge"

This is what I was referring to. It's not an attempt to play.

 

[PokerBlade]

On watching the replays, I actually think it was a decent challenge and he may have got some of the ball. So they can feel a little aggrieved at that one. It looked awful and clumsy at the time.

The second one is still a clear red in any game.

 

[s4-blade]

If you could just post this on whatever Shrewsbury boards Roy found, that'd be great.

As requested, I did. Some of the responses from the local pond life were utterly ridiculous...

"Then pictures are very deceiving! Agogo's was a 50/50. Yellow at most he didn't dive in and it wasn't reckless"

"A fair, challenge and a 50/50, no cards needed in either, just Deadman ruining another game"

 

[PokerBlade]

As requested, I did. Some of the responses from the local pond life were utterly ridiculous...

"Then pictures are very deceiving! Agogo's was a 50/50. Yellow at most he didn't dive in and it wasn't reckless"

"A fair, challenge and a 50/50, no cards needed in either, just Deadman ruining another game"

Lol, but also slightly sad.

 

[Ainsley Harriott]

Deadman has been banned for life.

So for those who said he was always dodgy - he was.

 

[Westran]

Expect some interesting refereeing on Saturday, deadmans been selected to take charge against Shrewsbury.

I bloody knew he was dodgy!

 

[Grizzly blade]

Wonder what's gone off there.

Betting on football is my guess. Hope there is no allegations of bribery or influencing games.

 

[8lade]

Wonder what's gone off there.

Betting on football is my guess. Hope there is no allegations of bribery or influencing games.

We'll never know; Deadman tells no tale.
Coat please...