95% of league clubs would have held protests and demonstrations aplenty by this point..
Demonstrations for what?
United have just signed a goalkeeper for half a mill.
In the past some of our Chairman wouldn't sign anyone and say we've no money and will only bring in free transfers.
Demonstrations are usually at the way a club is being run?
It's a lot more that just results on the pitch
Take Coventry, Charlton or even Hull City.
Hull are in the PL but their fans are fed up with their owner who isn't bothered about the fans.
We are always the club with the biggest wage budget making sure we can compete every year.
We always show ambition by bringing in managers other league clubs could only dream of.
I remember the 80's and early 90's and we were a joke off the pitch then.
Now it's on the pitch we're a joke but off the pitch we're are much much better off, no comparison.
I've used the same arguement many times.
If the board appointed Jose Mourinho and signed Messi and Ronaldo
And we got off to a poor start not winning a match, the do you think there should be demonstrations?
And would you say the board have f**cked up again because everyone knows Mourinho, Messi and Ronaldo are past it and would clearly not be able to motivate themselves in league 1?