Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Now Sullivan and Gold have gone in at West Ham, I think this means our dosh arrives a bit quicker.
Presumably this helps with cash flow?
I thought we got an extra £5M if the takeover took place but thought it was still paid over the same period of time ?
It is understood that West Ham have agreed to pay Sheffield United £15m over five years, with an extra bond of £5m payable in the event of the club being sold within a certain time period.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/mar/16/sheffield-united-west-ham-carlos-tevez
Don't know how right it is obviously...
Haven't got the accounts handy but don't recollect any extra due if they got took over but do seem to recall they paid up quicker.
Now Sullivan and Gold have gone in at West Ham, I think this means our dosh arrives a bit quicker.
Presumably this helps with cash flow?
These two were being lauded as good sensible custodians on MOTD. Yet if Brum hadn't been promoted last season they'd have been in major bother. Better to be lucky than good.
Anyway, the dildo merchant names us a major creditor while explaining just what a mess they're in. And boy, is it a mess.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jan/19/david-sullivan-west-ham-bad-situation
Loving the smoking jacket. :thumbup:
What with my reputation........
Get the feeling he admires Hugh Hefner?
I think they have shown a lot of courage to put their money in. It also shines a light on some of the crazy wheeling and dealing that the Icelanders did, including borrowing against their future season ticket sales, (I dont expect even Dude would be stupid enough to do that...or would he...?)
"If West Ham owe £40M to other clubs, can anyone explain why the Premier League haven’t withheld their television money and imposed a transfer ban on them? Serious question, I’m struggling to see the difference."
If West Ham owe £40M to other clubs, can anyone explain why the Premier League haven’t withheld their television money and imposed a transfer ban on them? Serious question, I’m struggling to see the difference.
So does this mean we should be rooting for Wham to stay in the Premiership if we are to get what's owed to us?
Uncomfortable with the thought but the Tevez money is more important.....
I admire your confidence in that we would still get our money![]()
Its a fooballing debt, hence it has to be paid in full, even if they go into administration.
If they don`t pay it in full, they get thrown out of the league.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?