Deadbat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,468
- Reaction score
- 37,757
Midfielders
Michael Doyle Often maligned, Doyle for me was one of our most consistent players this season. He had a difficult spell to start that mirrored much of the side and became the brunt of many fans frustrations (the truth was hardly anyone was performing in a strange system/tactical approach). For all the criticism he gets, manager keeps picking him so must be doing something right (although the counter argument may me most of our managers have been useless as we slide down the leagues!). One of the few constants all season and rarely was out of the team with McGinn and Coady the two often rotated alongside him and latterly Scougall when we went with a three in there.
His early performances were mixed and at times he got a lot of flak (maybe many others - some of the newer players who did not shine deserved more) but steadily he got better and became a key man as the resurgence took place. Continued to sit in front of the back four and break up play/make tackles and act as the spoiler but also his passing was underrated. The so called ball player McGinn alongside him was far more careless with the ball than Doyle. Also got a few goals showing he could hit a ball from range and maybe does not do this enough.
When he got sent off against Fulham it was interesting that he was not given the same treatment as Brandy and showed what Clough thought of him as he came back in almost straight away. A big part of the run when he put in 7.5 and 8/10 most weeks and I felt was one of standout players keeping to his standards most weeks when others often had some good games and then some off games or were rotated in and out of the team.
Often questions mark arose over his leadership and some were valid as he often barked at players or criticised rather than talking or cajoling and you rarely saw him leading in terms of gathering the players or even the spoken word on the field (although this is hard to know for sure). This side of his game got better under Clough as the team became more together and I felt he was rallying the troops in a productive way and there were some sense to his radio interviews (said a lot of rubbish in previous years without backing it up). His interview to Radio Sheffield where he was crying almost summed up that he did care and maybe finally changed some fans opinions of him.
Overall, he is not great and for a side looking for promotion, is he good enough? Yes and no. If you surround him with the right players in front of him and behind he can be fine and is effective at what he does. He probably would start for nearly every other team. The issue we have is with so many small players you would like bigger, more physical presence, especially in the sitting, holding midfielder type but that is nit picking. As others have alluded to I like the lad at Brentford who seemed to have lost his way a bit; Diagouraga (loaned to Pompey but came back and did well against us and always impresses) and he would be an excellent signing to provide completion here. I expect Doyle will be one of the first names on the team sheets as priorities are elsewhere and he is in a similar situation to Collins in this regard.
Like Collins, in an ideal world, he will be part of the side/quad next season as we go up and then as callous as it seems he will leave when his contract is up as we seek faster, more mobile and generally better players who could thrive at the second tier.
Grade B-
Kevin McDonald Still gets a lot of criticism when he is discussed but to my mind was a huge loss when he left (look at the results/performance after he went - know it was not all down to him). Sure, he did not score many or actually directly set up many. He went missing in some of the big games and has been drifting around quite a bit since promise shown at Burnley when he was young BUT he was still the best technical midfielder we have had for many years. His touch, control and range of passing was excellent and he made us tick in many games. He could have done more and at times seemed very weak for his size and never seemed much of a team player (almost never celebrated goals with his colleagues) but I enjoyed watching him and felt he was one of the key men as we made the playoffs two years running. He began very well against Notts County but then had an indifferent game in the cup but Weir felt he would be the man to build around (unwisely if he knew of the contract situation). No one will know if United could have done more to keep him (should they have put clause in - did they have a choice and/or could they have offered him more to stay?) and I am not sure anyone could blame him going if he got more money and playing for a better team (eventual champions). Yes Scougall and Baxter did ok but are different players. If McDonald had been at the club all season would we have done better and hot more results/goals; particularly the early spell? Think the answer is unequivocally yes to these questions.
He was by many reports one of Wolves best players throughout season and won some of the player of the season awards. At the Lane he may not have been brilliant but he kick started many of their attacks and I felt helped them control the game. Unsure if he will ever be a top, top player but should be comfortable in the league above. He seems to be adding goals/assists more and if he can be more consistent and develop a toughness to his game still could go on and be a top end Championship player at the least. Hopefully if we get players of his ilk in the future we will be in a better position to keep with new finances and management team.
Grade B-
Connor Coady Came from Liverpool with a decent reputation as he captained England u20's and had been a stand out in the reserves but was now 20 and not close to the first team. I saw him against York and then Notts County (brief cameo) and he looked very good, got on the ball and showed he could get up and down. After this as the team struggled he was in and out of the team and ended up often playing more wide which did not suit him as he lacks strength or pace. The whole side struggled and he looked a bit lost and lacking confidence. I think I even wrote at the time he was no better than some of the youngsters we had (McFadzean, Whitehouse etc) which now looks foolish in hindsight. He kept working hard and like with most, when Clough came in his standards improved. As the new formation settled down he just grew and got better and better. He had a spell around the winning run where he was exceptional and I recall games against Forest and Peterborough where he was very good, getting on the ball, making good runs and playing good passes or having shots on goal. He seemed to be getting physically stronger and more confident in everything he did and his fitness levels improved too. He became a key man as he played in the 5 but often alternated with Scougall and/or Baxter in the ones who moved forward/back and the new formation seemed to suit him as he could be more flexible. He had a so-so game in the semi final and a few injuries saw him have a stop-start end to the season but he had been a big part of the improvements of the whole side.
Refreshing to see a midfielder who wanted to get beyond the strikers and make good runs. He got into the box and was quite a decent finisher when he got there. He scored 6 goals and probably could have had more (maybe matches former Blade Peter Hetherston for his ability to somehow hit the post/bar in games).
Would like to see him back as feel he is getting better and better. He knows his own game more now and what he can do and cannot do and believe he would stand out at this level next season. Will he return? I think he would if he had a choice and unsure if Liverpool would have him in a 25 man squad especially with incoming players if they win the league and then have Champions League football too. If I was Liverpool you would be delighted with what United have done with him as he plays every week almost and is improving but you would want to see him do it at a higher level too and I think they will explore if Championship teams may take him. That is what I would do even though that is no good for United. If they did they could then take him back if he does it there or move him on (still entitled to a fee for him as he is under 24) at the end of his contract next season. Be great if we could get him for another season loan or bettering this buy him (he is 21 now so will Liverpool think he will ever be quite enough for them?).
Grade B-
Ryan Flynn I have been accused of having a real blind spot when it comes to my analysis of Flynn but I believe I have always tried to be fair. Up to this season he had shown some flashes and always put a shift in for the side. He always looked a decent finisher and scored some vital goals and made some with good passes/crosses. However, I felt he was weak, quite slow and often games drifted him by. I felt he was one of players who summed up the state of the club. Did their best but ultimately no real huge positives and the sort of player why we were at the level we were. That may sound harsh but I felt was true. He always gave 100% though and could not question the job he did for the team but for a winger I needed more out of him in terms of threat and/or penetration. This season for the first half it was much of the same with some decent showings mixed in with a lot more average-poor ones (with the rest of the side).
When Clough came things changed. Some will say to critique me he had done some of the things under Clough but even those will admit he did not do it anywhere near consistently enough. He suddenly started to become a major attacking threat. He still did the hard work and the defensive stuff but things we had only seen in flashes came to the fore. He almost became quick and strong overnight (sounds off but others I sit with have said the same) and we saw some lung bursting 40 or 50 yard runs where he went past men for speed and strength. It was bizarre but in a good way. His performance at Villa was superb with a great winner (maybe the moment of the season for me) and he had numerous other good games as we moved up the league. He became one of our key men and some teams started to double up on him. He has always been a good finisher (his chance to goal ratio must be exceptionally high) and the goal v Charlton proved this as it was not an easy finish by any stretch. His performance in the semi was decent as he got up and down, contributed to a goal and looked a player who could cause defenders problems. Became a fan favourite and to me suddenly started to 'get it' in terms of what a winger needed to do (eg not come inside but go at defenders a lot of the time and turn them the other way - get crosses in and make things happen allied to the defensive/hard work he puts in). Teamed up great with Brayford as we caused teams so many problems down our right hand side. It was notable when Brayford was out that his threat did lessen and something to look out for and consider if/when Brayford goes back.
Great to have him back resigned on a longer deal but he must show what he has in the second half from the start of next season. He needs to prove he was not doing it just for a contract or to impress the new manager and it is vital his performances do not tail off. That is why it would be good to have a Brandy (see section for explanation) or someone of that ilk to pressure him and Murphy if they do not perform.
Grade B-
Michael Doyle Often maligned, Doyle for me was one of our most consistent players this season. He had a difficult spell to start that mirrored much of the side and became the brunt of many fans frustrations (the truth was hardly anyone was performing in a strange system/tactical approach). For all the criticism he gets, manager keeps picking him so must be doing something right (although the counter argument may me most of our managers have been useless as we slide down the leagues!). One of the few constants all season and rarely was out of the team with McGinn and Coady the two often rotated alongside him and latterly Scougall when we went with a three in there.
His early performances were mixed and at times he got a lot of flak (maybe many others - some of the newer players who did not shine deserved more) but steadily he got better and became a key man as the resurgence took place. Continued to sit in front of the back four and break up play/make tackles and act as the spoiler but also his passing was underrated. The so called ball player McGinn alongside him was far more careless with the ball than Doyle. Also got a few goals showing he could hit a ball from range and maybe does not do this enough.
When he got sent off against Fulham it was interesting that he was not given the same treatment as Brandy and showed what Clough thought of him as he came back in almost straight away. A big part of the run when he put in 7.5 and 8/10 most weeks and I felt was one of standout players keeping to his standards most weeks when others often had some good games and then some off games or were rotated in and out of the team.
Often questions mark arose over his leadership and some were valid as he often barked at players or criticised rather than talking or cajoling and you rarely saw him leading in terms of gathering the players or even the spoken word on the field (although this is hard to know for sure). This side of his game got better under Clough as the team became more together and I felt he was rallying the troops in a productive way and there were some sense to his radio interviews (said a lot of rubbish in previous years without backing it up). His interview to Radio Sheffield where he was crying almost summed up that he did care and maybe finally changed some fans opinions of him.
Overall, he is not great and for a side looking for promotion, is he good enough? Yes and no. If you surround him with the right players in front of him and behind he can be fine and is effective at what he does. He probably would start for nearly every other team. The issue we have is with so many small players you would like bigger, more physical presence, especially in the sitting, holding midfielder type but that is nit picking. As others have alluded to I like the lad at Brentford who seemed to have lost his way a bit; Diagouraga (loaned to Pompey but came back and did well against us and always impresses) and he would be an excellent signing to provide completion here. I expect Doyle will be one of the first names on the team sheets as priorities are elsewhere and he is in a similar situation to Collins in this regard.
Like Collins, in an ideal world, he will be part of the side/quad next season as we go up and then as callous as it seems he will leave when his contract is up as we seek faster, more mobile and generally better players who could thrive at the second tier.
Grade B-
Kevin McDonald Still gets a lot of criticism when he is discussed but to my mind was a huge loss when he left (look at the results/performance after he went - know it was not all down to him). Sure, he did not score many or actually directly set up many. He went missing in some of the big games and has been drifting around quite a bit since promise shown at Burnley when he was young BUT he was still the best technical midfielder we have had for many years. His touch, control and range of passing was excellent and he made us tick in many games. He could have done more and at times seemed very weak for his size and never seemed much of a team player (almost never celebrated goals with his colleagues) but I enjoyed watching him and felt he was one of the key men as we made the playoffs two years running. He began very well against Notts County but then had an indifferent game in the cup but Weir felt he would be the man to build around (unwisely if he knew of the contract situation). No one will know if United could have done more to keep him (should they have put clause in - did they have a choice and/or could they have offered him more to stay?) and I am not sure anyone could blame him going if he got more money and playing for a better team (eventual champions). Yes Scougall and Baxter did ok but are different players. If McDonald had been at the club all season would we have done better and hot more results/goals; particularly the early spell? Think the answer is unequivocally yes to these questions.
He was by many reports one of Wolves best players throughout season and won some of the player of the season awards. At the Lane he may not have been brilliant but he kick started many of their attacks and I felt helped them control the game. Unsure if he will ever be a top, top player but should be comfortable in the league above. He seems to be adding goals/assists more and if he can be more consistent and develop a toughness to his game still could go on and be a top end Championship player at the least. Hopefully if we get players of his ilk in the future we will be in a better position to keep with new finances and management team.
Grade B-
Connor Coady Came from Liverpool with a decent reputation as he captained England u20's and had been a stand out in the reserves but was now 20 and not close to the first team. I saw him against York and then Notts County (brief cameo) and he looked very good, got on the ball and showed he could get up and down. After this as the team struggled he was in and out of the team and ended up often playing more wide which did not suit him as he lacks strength or pace. The whole side struggled and he looked a bit lost and lacking confidence. I think I even wrote at the time he was no better than some of the youngsters we had (McFadzean, Whitehouse etc) which now looks foolish in hindsight. He kept working hard and like with most, when Clough came in his standards improved. As the new formation settled down he just grew and got better and better. He had a spell around the winning run where he was exceptional and I recall games against Forest and Peterborough where he was very good, getting on the ball, making good runs and playing good passes or having shots on goal. He seemed to be getting physically stronger and more confident in everything he did and his fitness levels improved too. He became a key man as he played in the 5 but often alternated with Scougall and/or Baxter in the ones who moved forward/back and the new formation seemed to suit him as he could be more flexible. He had a so-so game in the semi final and a few injuries saw him have a stop-start end to the season but he had been a big part of the improvements of the whole side.
Refreshing to see a midfielder who wanted to get beyond the strikers and make good runs. He got into the box and was quite a decent finisher when he got there. He scored 6 goals and probably could have had more (maybe matches former Blade Peter Hetherston for his ability to somehow hit the post/bar in games).
Would like to see him back as feel he is getting better and better. He knows his own game more now and what he can do and cannot do and believe he would stand out at this level next season. Will he return? I think he would if he had a choice and unsure if Liverpool would have him in a 25 man squad especially with incoming players if they win the league and then have Champions League football too. If I was Liverpool you would be delighted with what United have done with him as he plays every week almost and is improving but you would want to see him do it at a higher level too and I think they will explore if Championship teams may take him. That is what I would do even though that is no good for United. If they did they could then take him back if he does it there or move him on (still entitled to a fee for him as he is under 24) at the end of his contract next season. Be great if we could get him for another season loan or bettering this buy him (he is 21 now so will Liverpool think he will ever be quite enough for them?).
Grade B-
Ryan Flynn I have been accused of having a real blind spot when it comes to my analysis of Flynn but I believe I have always tried to be fair. Up to this season he had shown some flashes and always put a shift in for the side. He always looked a decent finisher and scored some vital goals and made some with good passes/crosses. However, I felt he was weak, quite slow and often games drifted him by. I felt he was one of players who summed up the state of the club. Did their best but ultimately no real huge positives and the sort of player why we were at the level we were. That may sound harsh but I felt was true. He always gave 100% though and could not question the job he did for the team but for a winger I needed more out of him in terms of threat and/or penetration. This season for the first half it was much of the same with some decent showings mixed in with a lot more average-poor ones (with the rest of the side).
When Clough came things changed. Some will say to critique me he had done some of the things under Clough but even those will admit he did not do it anywhere near consistently enough. He suddenly started to become a major attacking threat. He still did the hard work and the defensive stuff but things we had only seen in flashes came to the fore. He almost became quick and strong overnight (sounds off but others I sit with have said the same) and we saw some lung bursting 40 or 50 yard runs where he went past men for speed and strength. It was bizarre but in a good way. His performance at Villa was superb with a great winner (maybe the moment of the season for me) and he had numerous other good games as we moved up the league. He became one of our key men and some teams started to double up on him. He has always been a good finisher (his chance to goal ratio must be exceptionally high) and the goal v Charlton proved this as it was not an easy finish by any stretch. His performance in the semi was decent as he got up and down, contributed to a goal and looked a player who could cause defenders problems. Became a fan favourite and to me suddenly started to 'get it' in terms of what a winger needed to do (eg not come inside but go at defenders a lot of the time and turn them the other way - get crosses in and make things happen allied to the defensive/hard work he puts in). Teamed up great with Brayford as we caused teams so many problems down our right hand side. It was notable when Brayford was out that his threat did lessen and something to look out for and consider if/when Brayford goes back.
Great to have him back resigned on a longer deal but he must show what he has in the second half from the start of next season. He needs to prove he was not doing it just for a contract or to impress the new manager and it is vital his performances do not tail off. That is why it would be good to have a Brandy (see section for explanation) or someone of that ilk to pressure him and Murphy if they do not perform.
Grade B-